TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying ThoughtcrimesRus's 10 most recent comments.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 7:37pm

  Ted Nugent is a good man and a patriot. Whatever he did when he was young, now he’s defending his country to the best of his ability, from what is probably the most dangerous enemy we have ever faced.

  That’s why the talentless hacks on SNL attack him. And for those of us with the ability to think for ourselves, that attack only defines the attacker; it says nothing about Nugent. Except that the liberal cult apparently fears him.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 5:35pm

  In reply to VorDaj.

  Whatever he did in the past, he’s trying to defend his country now.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 5:32pm

  One thing that gives the comedian corps of the liberal press so much power is that many people believe that good comedy is based in truth, so if something gets a laugh from an audience, it must reflect truth.

  This of course is a lie. The truth is, things are usually funnier if they are based in what is believed to be true; often what is believed to be true and what is actually true are one and the same thing, but sometimes they are not, and when there is a difference, it will be the false truth that gets the laugh, not the actual truth.

  What is believed to be true is programmed into consumers of the liberal press by the rest of that big lie machine, then the comedian corps drives the point home by basing jokes on the false truth. This one two punch is a good example of combined arms used in political war.

  Obviously the cheering section of liberal dupes that makes up the audience is an important component.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 5:22pm

  Gun control is obviously very important to the liberal cult, or they wouldn’t go so far out on the proverbial limb by telling such outlandish lies to promote it. Their attacks on patriots who stand up for the right to keep and bear arms, along with their attacks on a real news organization, only define them.

  It’s common cult behavior for cult members to be told that anything that conflicts with cult ideology is “of the devil.” In that way the cult member simply shuts out any information that might have a deprogramming effect. There are a great many ways this can be done; the attacks by ridicule of those who tell the truth and speak out against gun control is one. And by coincidence, it happens to be one recommended by Saul Alinsky.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 5:16pm

  In reply to wowjustwow.

  Bigotry and propaganda can be funny I suppose, but this wasn’t. The last few times I watched SNL, even their nonpolitical and non-propaganda skits weren’t funny. These hacks only have their jobs because they are politically correct, and willing to take part in big lie campaigns.

• SNL Mocks ‘Fox & Friends’ With Interview of ‘Crazy’ Ted Nugent on Obama’s State of the Union

  February 17, 2013 at 5:12pm

  SNL, along with the rest of the comedy corps, is a useful part of the liberal propaganda machine. Those affected by the machine are well known to us:

  Deprogramming Services update (from a memo sent out by the leadership of the liberal cult): There is a political force that has proven to be very powerful in present day America: the Low Information Voter (LIV). This voter has been deliberately made stupid by the big lie campaigns of the Ministry of Truth (liberal press in other words), and a big part of those campaigns is the denial of information that could lead the voter to see the truth. Much of this ignorance is self-inflicted, but it is all driven by the Ministry.

  The Party has an acronym for this voter: Information Denied Intentionally for Obedience to Tyranny (IDIOT).

• Yes, SNL Did Marco Rubio’s State of the Union Water Break

  February 17, 2013 at 11:27am

  I don’t watch SNL any more; I did for awhile because it’s such a good study in propaganda, but I got bored with that study quite awhile ago. So I’m curious: did SNL do anything about Obama telling the Russian diplomat that he would have more “flexibility” after the election? Was that admission of a big lie on Obama’s part talked about as much by the liberal press as Rubio’s awkward drink of water?

• Yes, SNL Did Marco Rubio’s State of the Union Water Break

  February 17, 2013 at 11:03am

  From a memorandum issued by the leadership of the liberal cult:
  Long ago general orders were issued to loyal cadres embedded in various information media. As with those given here some are more heavily cloaked than others, but all work together toward the same end, which is absolute power in our hands. Among the most notable are these: Committee for a Bolshevik System (CBS), Alliance to Bastardize the Constitution (ABC), Nefarious Bringers of Corruption (NBC), Council of Nonsense for the Naive (CNN), and Media System for Nitwits to Betray the Country (MSNBC).

• Yes, SNL Did Marco Rubio’s State of the Union Water Break

  February 17, 2013 at 11:00am

  In reply to ThoughtcrimesRus.

  The liberal press will sell America the most oppressive government it can get naïve voters to buy. I agree that the Republicans aren’t a lot better than the Democrats, but they are still better, and that’s why they are attacked by the liars of the liberal press.

• Yes, SNL Did Marco Rubio’s State of the Union Water Break

  February 17, 2013 at 10:11am

  Even though this skit really was nothing but propaganda, and so is all the rest of the talk about Rubio’s drink of water, it was an awkward move on his part, and it did give America’s internal enemy ammunition to use against him. It shows that Rubio is not ready for the position he’s being prepared for. Maybe in several years he will be, or maybe he never will.

  We are told that the Republicans have to nominate a Hispanic to get the Hispanic vote. But Sarah Palin didn’t get the women’s vote for McCain. And Rubio won’t get the Hispanic vote either.

  The Republicans should do what MLK said he dreamed of: judge candidates by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin.