A Personal Philosophy of Marxism is, in fact, a very healthy thing. It is a Personal Choice based on Reason and Compassion for others.
A Political System of Marxism is not healthy as it is based on Force, the Law, the point of a gun and is NOT a free choice.
Never confuse these things. He has not.
 June 30, 2015 at 3:22pm
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Make them hide and 1) we don’t see them or know who they are and 2) we stoke the flames of hatred *for* them, justifying, in their minds, a response.
He’s dead wrong on this one.
 June 29, 2015 at 4:25pm
Everything born dies.
America died long ago.
There is a saying, “The best way to teach a fool a lesson is to give him anything he wants.”
Let’s give it to them. Good and Hard.
Quit your job if you can.
File for every benefit you can get (and give it to charity if it bugs you).
Cheat on your taxes (you can’t steal from a thief).
Do everything you can think of to put more stress on the System.
Step back for a few years and let it collapse.
Then, among the ashes, we start again…
Where will you go? Every other country has fully socialized medicine.
Any American that renounces their citizenship loses their gun rights. Read the 4473 sometime and you’ll see what I’m talking about and their is almost no where else on the planet guns can be taken with you from the states.
 June 23, 2015 at 1:58pm
What else do we drop because Morons Insist?
June 22, 2015 at 10:30am
Further proof that telling Mitt to shove it was the right call…
He's a registered Hopolophobe for sure...
How wide has the swing been towards the New Huffington Post--- Beck Edition.
What is he wrong about?
How about everything he wrote! This is an excellent example of thinking with anything but a brain. It's all feel good speak. He straight up admits in several places that the arguments he is trying to refute are right. But, goes on in each case to put emotion before logic. It's the same crap the Left has been pulling for years. Twisting the words to either play up or play down the emotions. Your not killing a baby...just aborting a fetus. Marriage isn't a religious sacrament... it's a economic or political Right. Hating the things they stand for is Racist or Bigoted....hating things they oppose is just and righteous. The plan fact is, it requires human being to commit murder, by whatever method. And one final point, at this stage in history, I wouldn't really trust either the Congress or the Courts to decide on any issue regarding the Constitution. Neither has demonstrated any real understanding or the subject.
Did anyone read the article about Karl Rove's comments on Fox News this Sunday? He's Pro 2nd Amendment also but you would not think it from those words. But what was said here and yesterday are true, that when you have harder access it will reduce the rate of violence but will not eliminate it.
Not to mention that someone 5.2' against someone 6' is going to find some equalizing power in a handgun that a bayonet simply will not afford. It would be inconceivable to give a woman a bayonet and tell her to take out a Mike Tyson sized thug. No thanks, silly man. I would prefer not to be in life threatening hand to hand combat with a man, I'll keep my handgun.
This was a very well-written article, and The Blaze needs more of this kind of rational thinking. God knows it's not coming from the people commenting...
Denvil's wrong on all his points:
1. If your argument is that guns don't kill people, people do, but people without guns kill fewer people, it's YOU who's missing the point. Gun use is a moral issue that you've completely sidestepped by citing leftist propaganda without its proper context. More violence happens in the US because there's more FREEDOM here. Freedom predicts that SOME will use privileges wrong, but MOST use it right.
2. Comparing individual gun ownership to state ownership of nuclear weapons demonstrates that you misunderstand both: it's moral relativism to conveniently forget that the US is a constitutional republic with democratic processes and a responsible government (in the technical, poli-sci sense of "responsible" not the lay sense--it gets less accountable to the people the more it grows), Iran is a theocratic dictatorship whose people don't support what the Ayatollah would use nuclear weapons for.
3. There are two variables you cite: force and surprise. Surprise was the one under Roof's control, so let's consider the scenario with only what the others could control: it's better to have the MEANS to meet force with equal or greater force, no matter what surprise is sprung. So why remove the POSSIBILITY of an instant and legitimate defense? It's illogical.
4. You should look up a few more SCOTUS decisions before opining, methinks. The question of whether handguns are protected is fairly settled. Self-defense is still a valid argument pro 2A, sorry.
June 10, 2015 at 1:19pm
Dug his work in Super Troopers….
 May 27, 2014 at 4:42pm
If these guys wanted to make some noise, just show up *after* a killing and remind people how stupid they were to be unarmed…
 May 27, 2014 at 2:48pm
May 27, 2014 at 12:33pm
Dude was begging to be shot. Someone helped him out. Had he threatened an armed civilian who then whacked him then we’d never have even had this discussion, would we?
 May 14, 2014 at 12:52pm
Anything that gets the word “oligarchy” in front of these idiot kids is OK by me…