User Profile: Tigress1


Member Since: January 08, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • July 28, 2014 at 6:17pm

    The answers are not different, but I don’t know many men who go around slapping each other. (A girly man fight?) If a fight breaks out somewhere it is usually a flat out punch and then they just go at it. Pretty fair unless one guy is small, but guys like that tend to lay low anyway.

  • July 28, 2014 at 5:18pm

    I agree with Whoopi to a degree. If the woman just slaps a man, he can slap her back but not slug her. If she is built like an Amazon woman and is beating the you-know-what out of the man, then he can defend himself. Too many women nowadays think they can do whatever they please to men without any consequences. They are mean, spoiled and total beotches. (Ever watch “Bridezilla”?) It’s never OK to hit anybody, and women need to learn that too, but self-defense is self-defense.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 28, 2014 at 5:02pm

    One more thing: When the death penalty is meted out, it needs to be humane. The justice is in the death itself and being at the mercy of one’s victims. We don’t need to become as barbaric as the criminal. God will dish out the true punishment.

  • July 28, 2014 at 4:55pm

    This story made me think about my position on the death penalty itself. I’ve never been “pro-death penalty” because I believe when God stated in the Ten Commandments “Thou shalt not kill” that He meant it. As a juror I might not be able to decide such a fate. HOWEVER, this is hypocritical of me, but if someone ever harmed a loved one of my family, there’s no telling what I’d do…
    Apparently, the family member in this particular story felt that the death was justified. Given that people directly affected by crimes often feel differently than objective jurors, etc. maybe we are going about this whole justice system wrong when it comes to the punishment of the death penalty? Here’s a possible solution: 1: Of course the death penalty should only be an option in the most horrific of crimes as it is now. 2: A jury should decide whether an individual is guilty of the crime. This is where it gets different: 3: Allow the victims or the family members decide if the criminal should be killed – not a jury or judge. If the family/victim wants to be merciful even though the victim might not have been shown any mercy – so be it. If the family wants the criminal executed – so be it also. This way the criminal is at the mercy of the individual or family of the person he murdered, etc. The jury doesn’t have the guilt of having to determine the life or death of another “human”, and the family can get revenge if they want or choose mercy if they want. Isn’t that TRUE justice?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] July 19, 2014 at 2:54pm

    Forgot the link:

    Fox News also reported this.

  • [22] July 19, 2014 at 2:52pm

    Woodyee, interesting video. Something else that is never mentioned is how many Katrina evacuees went to Texas and never returned to New Orleans? Those were primarily Democrat voters too. This is gerrymandering without changing the districts! Very sneaky, but EVERYTHING Progressives do is sneaky, insidious, and unethical.

    Since we are not being told where all these illegals are being shipped/flown to within our borders, maybe we can see which Catholic churches received the most money and make a safe assumption that that is where the illegals will end up?

    Lastly, the scariest thing I heard reported was that these illegals are being allowed to board our commercial airplanes without any identification!!! We have no idea who these people are – they could be Al Qaeda – and they are sitting on OUR airplanes! It’s insane! People need to refuse to get on a plane if they know there are some of these illegals boarding with them. If the airlines lose money, they might think twice about allowing it. The pilots shouldn’t be too happy about having illegals on board as well. WE have to have proof of identity in order to get on board, therefore, so should THEY!

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] July 19, 2014 at 2:11pm

    “with Chancellor Angela Merkel once comparing NSA surveillance tactics to the Stasi, the communist East German secret police.”

    Well, they would know!

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] July 19, 2014 at 12:59pm

    Either that, or they know they will look more “pathetic” if they show up without any shoes. Fox News keeps showing over and over again the bare feet of a small child wearing pink pants. She’s got the cleanest bare feet I’ve ever seen for someone who has no shoes!

  • [33] July 19, 2014 at 12:46pm

    I guess I’m just dense, but what is so “heartbreaking” about finding a pair of baby tennis shoes and a baby scorpion sitting on a life jacket? The tennis shoes look new – I guess they wanted a newer pair so they left them behind? A scorpion? Really? You are in Texas! They are about as common as roaches in New York! Instead of “heartbreaking”, seeing all the life jackets, a more suitable word is “disgusting”.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] July 17, 2014 at 7:42pm

    The majority of these illegals invading us are not children.

  • July 17, 2014 at 11:08am

    “How can higher interest rates bring about a better economic outcome?”

    What the Progressives refuse to admit is that higher interest rates HELP people who have investments. These are not necessarily the uber-wealthy, they are average, everyday Americans who are trying to save for retirement, their kids college, future goals and dreams. Low interest rates help those who are just starting out in life and those who really aren’t trying to save any money. A low interest rate helps people who are SPENDING money, but it hurts people who are SAVING money! Progressives want to bring back the zero-down housing loans so that people who cannot or will not save money for their future can get a home. Really, this again? As Rick said, “Can’t we get some hindsight NOW?” We don’t need more people who can SPEND money (anybody can do that), we need people who can SAVE money. In the long run, this will bring about a better economic outcome for this entire country. We need people who can afford to live comfortably in retirement. Higher interest rates help that. Social Security WON’T be there in a few years. Then what will we do? Another damn gov. program that we can’t afford and will further bankrupt this country???? Help those who help themselves.

  • [3] July 17, 2014 at 10:11am

    Glenn, there’s only one problem with this. Yesterday, on Fox (Stuart Varney was the fill-in host) there was a discussion with a woman in Mass. (a leader in the local school system) who said that their school system was being over-run with children from Guatemala. These kids could not speak English, and they didn’t even speak Spanish! They spoke different tribal languages from Guatemala. They were illiterate in both their own languages and English. Your words might not even be understood if this is where the majority of the illegals are coming from.

  • July 17, 2014 at 9:11am

    This probably won’t go over very well here on The Blaze, but doesn’t that say that these hunters are killing more than they can eat themselves? Somehow I doubt it if they are hunting PURELY to feed the homeless, etc. They are doing it for sport and the donation is an afterthought or excuse. It’s still better than just wasting the animal, but that poor animal probably didn’t want to die. I know, I know, I DO eat meat and all that, it’s just hunting for sport that just seems wrong to me. I love Ted Nugent, I support gun rights, it’s just killing for sport that is creepy.

  • [5] July 17, 2014 at 8:47am

    Sorry. I forgot “transgender” wasn’t the same as “transsexual”. My bad. This stuff is so confusing to me! Stuff like your gender doesn’t have to be confusing or complicated! Every parent needs to teach their children: Look between your legs. What you see is what you are. Period. (period meaning “final” – not the Obama definition of “period”.)

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] July 17, 2014 at 8:43am

    “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.” The key is the “wisdom to know the difference”. Just because something can now be changed due to technology, that doesn’t mean that it SHOULD be changed.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 17, 2014 at 8:35am

    He must not have ever heard of “self-control”. Did he not even consider how he would pee? Now he’s a big dummy and definitely not a god!

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 10:23am

    Hmmm. Wikipedia says that 80% of the prisoners who “find faith” during incarceration become Muslim:

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 10:05am

    It would be interesting to see how many criminals enter our prison system as one religion, and exit as Muslim converts. Many prisoners suddenly “find Jesus” in order to get parole, but how many “find Mohammad”?

    Responses (1) +
  • [17] July 15, 2014 at 10:00am

    I agree with everything said here. This invasion of illegals is not just children. We have no idea WHO is coming in. This is a TRUE Trojan Horse. Interesting how history repeats itself, even if it is thousands of years later.

    Responses (7) +
  • July 15, 2014 at 9:56am

    Maybe that’s what Obama meant by “leading from behind”? I always thought that people who lead from behind were called “followers”.

123 To page: Go