User Profile: tmarends


Member Since: September 03, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] July 1, 2015 at 12:03pm

    I’m sorry… I still don’t understand… how is processing LEGAL paperwork against your religious convictions?? Does that mean the DMV worker can turn people away from their window and force them back into that endless line if they feel the person in front of them is somehow against their “religious convictions”?

    Responses (2) +
  • June 25, 2015 at 4:18pm

    So keep your heterosexuality out of MY face… it’s all over the place and it’s disgusting. I don’t care what you do in your bedroom, but keep it out of the public sphere… I don’t want to see a man and a woman holding hands… I don’t want to see them kissing… keep it to yourselves… stop forcing it on the rest of us.

  • June 25, 2015 at 10:30am

    The commandments Jesus gave are 1) Love God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and 2) Love your neighbor as yourself.

  • [2] June 25, 2015 at 10:28am

    There is NOTHING this guy can say that will convince me that God did not create me exactly as He wanted me to be. If the torture I endured during “ex-gay therapy” didn’t turn me straight, nothing short of God’s intervention will… and I’ve come to accept that God does not want me to be straight, but to spread His message as a gay man.

  • June 22, 2015 at 12:43am

    @tbeachhead — “abomination” in the Bible actually has a closer meaning to “taboo”. For instance, in Genesis 43 it is called an “abomination” for the Egyptians to share a meal with the Hebrews. Now, obviously, there is nothing sinful about anyone eating a meal with someone of a different culture… but it is called an “abomination” for the Egyptians to do so in Genesis. AND it is the same Hebrew word that is used in the Leviticus verses.

  • [2] June 17, 2015 at 7:45pm

    Amen. I would also add another verse… Galatians 3:28 — There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

  • [3] June 17, 2015 at 3:56pm

    Nobody is ASKING him to perform a marriage ceremony between ANY two people he disagrees with… THAT IS his Constitutional right. Quite honestly, these doomsday statements about having to be FORCED to participate in any marriage they do not support just makes them look foolish.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] June 8, 2015 at 2:27pm

    In fact… the father of the computer — Alan Turing — was a gay man… so I guess he needs to stop using a computer all together as well.

  • [1] June 8, 2015 at 1:55pm

    Since both Facebook and Twitter support gay rights… maybe Mr Graham needs to find a different outlet to spread his message… Otherwise he is calling for others to do what he himself is not willing to do.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 30, 2015 at 3:44pm

    @MSSoldier — did you actually READ the story you linked?? That baker did NOT refuse to bake a cake… they refused offensive words. And the buyer wasn’t asking for a Bible quote… they were paraphrasing the Bible.

  • [-1] April 30, 2015 at 3:33pm

    Where the cake is used is immaterial…. If someone asks for a cake that says “Congratulations John” the baker should make it… just because it’s going to be used at a Klan rally for an outgoing Grand Wizard, for example, is meaningless. As long as any words or images cannot be construed as offensive, the baker should make the cake… and “Congratulations John” is not is anyway offensive to anyone.

  • [3] April 30, 2015 at 3:23pm

    @MSSoldier — the courts, again and again, have said you CAN refuse offensive words and images, you CANNOT refuse the basic service (selling a cake). THAT is the difference.

  • [-2] April 29, 2015 at 3:52pm

    HummingBird — Every person sins, whether they want to acknowledge they sin or not. YOU have sinned today. I have also sinned today, I don’t deny it. You can say you are going to refuse to engage in sinful behavior all you want, but the truth is you DO engage in sinful behavior each and every day of your life. It is through Christ that I am washed clean of my sins, and nothing you, nor anyone else, says or does can change that.

  • [1] April 29, 2015 at 3:36pm

    The Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862, signed by President Lincoln, bans marriage to more than one spouse at a time. This provides legal precedence for denying polygamous marriage recognition by the state

  • April 29, 2015 at 3:00pm

    @pa_native — Yes… for 200+ years women were the property of men. A man went to a woman’s father and bought her for a price (called a dowry) to become his wife and mother of his children. The “Historical” definition of marriage HAS changed.

  • [-1] April 28, 2015 at 5:46pm

    @Bytheppl4theppl — Jesus often ate meals with thieves and prostitutes… it DOES say that in the Bible… and He was often rebuked for doing so by the religious leaders of the time. If you want to be “separate from the world” then don’t set up a business IN the world.

  • April 28, 2015 at 5:40pm

    The difference with “no shirt, no shoes, no service” is that it is applied equally to ALL people. ANYONE who enters not wearing shoes, regardless of race, gender, age, etc, is being refused service. I would hope the business owner would allow someone who lost their legs to enter without shoes on though.

  • [13] April 27, 2015 at 1:49pm

    As a gay man, I happen to agree with this decision. AND the same goes for a bakery… you CAN refuse words or images you find offensive, but you CANNOT refuse the basic service… be that printing T-shirts, or baking a cake.

    Responses (5) +
  • [1] April 14, 2015 at 2:58pm

    I don’t know about anyone else… but what I learned as part of customer service is you make every attempt to provide the services you offer to anyone who wants them, as long as it is 1) legal, and 2) available.

  • [-4] April 13, 2015 at 3:33pm

    Most people, and that includes LGBT people, just go to what is the most convenient to their location. Why go 10 miles out of your way when you have a florist down the street?

    In this case, this was a business which provided a place to host weddings. Unlike a church, which also plays host to weddings, businesses CANNOT discriminate. If they don’t want to serve ALL the public who seeks their business, then WHY are they in business? You say they have the RIGHT of conscience to refuse to participate… and you are right… the INDIVIDUAL has that right. The BUSINESS does not. Their wedding venue must host any legal wedding in their state. Churches, on the other hand, can set parameters to their venue (like one party must be a member of the church, or the couple must go through per-marital counseling with the church first).

    Responses (4) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love