User Profile: toadicusrex


Member Since: February 01, 2011


  • [7] September 24, 2014 at 12:01pm

    Can’t get a Darwin unless they take themselves out of the gene pool. And she’s clearly propagating.

  • August 20, 2013 at 1:43pm

    @RabidPatriot I don’t know if her face still hurts…. but it’s killing me!

  • April 26, 2013 at 9:49pm

    No, I totally disagree. In fact, I couldn’t disagree more. Free markets are what make people earn a decent wage. Unions do not do that – they choke companies trying to compete. If you have competition in the market, there is no need for a union. If you put unions in, they just kill companies.

    Give people the chance to start businesses and grow, and the wages will increase.

  • April 8, 2013 at 7:11pm

    Well said, Saranda. Ares, it is cultural. Wearing a suit is cultural. You’re dead wrong and if this is your unequivocal, unbending position on something so irrelevant as the way someone dresses… you have a problem. If I expect you to wear a suit before I listen to you, then I have a problem. The problem is the misunderstanding on both sides of the race issue – and you can’t be part of the solution by being intolerant of the way people look based on their style of dress. Otherwise you may as well forever mark those you don’t agree with off as lost. There are a lot of good people in that group that might just agree with you, given the chance, a little humility, staunch dedication to moral principles, and willingness to understand and tolerate someone that isn’t quite as enlightened as you are.

  • March 1, 2013 at 4:39am

    That is NOT what he said. The point he was trying to make is that LOCAL governments have the right to make decisions for their jurisdiction. And you must hear the rest of it; if you live in a very populated area and there is a likelihood of that gun falling into the hands of a crazy person.

    Don’t be too quick to judge. A real constitutionalist recognizes the right of a local – even a state – government to make such rules. For example, a state may establish a state religion; the federal government may not. The more local the government, the more leeway it has because those in power and those who are governed become closer to being one and the same. It’s only when you become more of a statistic and less of an individual that those same allowances become worrisome.

  • December 26, 2012 at 2:51pm

    It never ceases to amaze me that those who claim to be the most tolerant can yet be the most arrogant and insulting. You pretend to having knowledge that the rest of “us simpletons” can’t seem to grasp. We are clearly not your intellectual equal.

    Since that is the case, you might use your amazing intellect to investigate the lobbying efforts that Planned Parenthood has exerted in order to legalize abortion across the board, and I might add, set themselves up to receive federal money for it. Right you said that you can’t currently use federal money for abortions, but Planned Parenthood would like that changed. Perhaps you should pay attention to the efforts of those you defend before you spout off. The point is that we don’t like the lobbying efforts of Planned Parenthood. As far as the “rest of the services” that Planned Parenthood provides on Taxpayer expense, fine – but they have used their power and the apparent saintly character of their organization to dupe the brilliant, such as yourself, into thinking that’s all they care about.

    As far as any of us on _this_ side not caring about the poor… maybe you should take a look at charitable giving. Liberals always claim the high road, but they take care of the poor with _other_ people’s money, not their own. And Jesus didn’t _hate_ the government, but he didn’t think people should turn to it for their every need. Jesus also didn’t hate the rich, as you fools would like us to believe. Just the love

  • October 2, 2012 at 9:48am

    EXACTLY. You nailed it,

  • September 25, 2012 at 4:28pm

    Personally, I hope that the level of commentary among conservatives would be a little higher than this. Innocent until proven guilty. And in my eyes, from what I’ve seen, there’s a reasonable doubt. Let God handle the judgement.

    I think the lyrics of this song are commendable.

  • September 13, 2012 at 6:03pm

    I don’t have a spare couch…. does an empty chair count?

    Responses (1) +
  • September 13, 2012 at 3:10pm

    Any of the 1909 Lincoln pennies that have been on Mars is probably worth a bit more. I’d collect them.

  • February 13, 2012 at 1:52pm

    Milk…. out nose… thanks, CanteenBoy.

  • December 22, 2011 at 3:48pm

    A vertebrae, part of her spine.

  • December 19, 2011 at 7:51pm

    Yep, your memory is failing you. McCain was not neck and neck with Obama. Palin breathed life into a “nearly-dead” campaign. I was there, I remember well.

  • December 19, 2011 at 7:49pm

    @ Fly on the wall

    So what? What’s your point with that? Do you realize what happened to Palin – not to mention her family? How she was lampooned? How even some who think they’re conservative bailed on her because the liberals made fun of her?

    The liberals gave her power. They revealed what they fear the most.

    I don’t blame her for trying to do what she can, and I don’t blame her for making money off of it. She’s not an elected official anymore, and she’s free to try to persuade her case in any way she can. She gets money because people believe in her. Market drives the price…. I’d hope you know that. There’s nothing wrong with her. I don’t have a problem with Clinton doing it either, or Obama, for that matter (after he’s out of office). The market drives the price.

    That isn’t politics. She’s not an elected official at the moment. She doesn’t rail against capitalism, she rails against votes being bought and sold by lobbyists. Government officials (not private sector) taking bribes for and against votes – THAT is criminal. And commonplace.

    And she stands against it. I, for one, encourage her run and pray for our country continually, that whether it be Palin, Bachmann, or whomever – that they be decent, honorable, principled and dedicated to liberty.

  • December 19, 2011 at 7:40pm

    No offense to you either… but that seems like a very unprincipled reply. Are you afraid of the liberals and their media machine? I won’t base my vote on what the liberals lampoon. In truth, they reveal by doing so what they fear the most.

    At the end of the movie, the good guys win. Have faith, vote for the best. In the end, we win.

  • December 19, 2011 at 7:37pm

    Had your koolaid? Drink up. What are you afraid of? Would you rather have Biden?

  • October 26, 2011 at 2:28pm

    @POLWATCHER I can respect your point of view, but there are things we talk about after a person has died in a negative way that are just part of history; Hitler, for example. We learn from it, and we try to ensure that such an abomination as the holocaust never happens again. There is little to no difference (except in scale) in dealing with the scars of abuse. We have to talk about the evil in the past to avoid repeating it. We learn, we grow, we make ourselves better.

    And if the dead can’t defend themselves, neither will they be hurt by it. I believe in helping the victim more than worrying about the offender, though both need attention. In this case, if the offender is dead…. we only have to worry about the victim.

    I think you’re being a little oversensitive.

  • October 12, 2011 at 12:51pm

    The AP lost me in the very first two “FACTS” paragraphs. Why can people not understand the simple relationship:

    1. Increased regulation leads to
    2. Increased prices leads to
    3. Decreased purchasing power leads to
    4. Decreased sales.

    Demand may or may not be there for a product, but actual purchases will not happen if the price is too high – it’s like asking $20 for a can of Coca-Cola – a few may do it but many are going to opt for something else. They may still WANT the coke but they evaluate the opportunity cost and it’s too high.

    Regulations kill jobs. Regulations increase prices. Regulations are one sector of our noble society placing themselves morally above another – and personally, I wouldn’t place most politicians in that position.

    Reminds me somewhat of the movie “As Good as it Gets”, when Jack Nicholson’s character starts to tell Helen Hunt’s character’s son that it’s impolite not to respond when spoken to. Helen Hunt says something to the effect of “You are the last person on Earth I want to have teach my kid morality.”

    (To Politicians) DO NOT pretend that you know better than I do what’s good for me, moral for me, or right for me. DON’T TREAD ON ME.

  • February 1, 2011 at 1:16pm

    I have no need to transport that.

Restoring Love