User Profile: Publius

Publius

Member Since: October 08, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 17, 2015 at 4:18pm

    Glenn has it wrong. No one said they ‘support’ Trumps candidacy, they merely support his running. It’s good for the country to get ideas on the table. Trump can be a huge barometer for another winning candidate to consider issues leading to his attraction.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 17, 2015 at 12:21pm

    Get a grip. we are losing our religion(s) because we willingly refuse to practice in a public manner. Those who are elected only hear and see the deviants, not the religious in the conduct of daily life.

    In reply to the contribution Christians: We're Losing Our Religion

  • [1] August 13, 2015 at 12:36pm

    To hell with the whining minority. What is the moral imperative here?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 7, 2015 at 12:22pm

    Racist! :D

  • [3] August 6, 2015 at 12:06pm

    Protocols, protocols, protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols,protocols!

  • [1] August 3, 2015 at 5:36pm

    When S H I T Stain Obama says ‘Time Is Not on Our Side’ he is directing his comment to his handlers and is referring to the 17 months he legally has left.

  • [3] July 31, 2015 at 5:27pm

    Not news! 2 people arguing. BFD!

  • [1] July 29, 2015 at 3:01pm

    Damn, what happened to white privileged?

  • [1] July 28, 2015 at 2:09pm

    Sure looked to me like driver of the SUV had the right of way. They were in the intersection first and the biker made no attempt to slow or avoid hitting the SUV.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 21, 2015 at 1:43pm

    He couldn’t bring himself to do it for a 5 CRACKERS for a mere act of senseless violence.

    “After his speech the President issued a proclamation for flags to be flown at half-staff through July 25 to honor slain Marines and a Sailor in Chattanooga, Tennessee.”

    President Obama called it a “mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence.”

  • [17] July 18, 2015 at 8:56pm

    They never were and never will be Americans. We are two cultures 180 degrees apart from each other. We cannot coexist.

  • June 29, 2015 at 4:36pm

    Interesting, very interesting. A man of God seeking the counsel of man.

  • [3] June 27, 2015 at 12:52pm

    Redefining marriage to make it a genderless institution fundamentally changes marriage: It makes the relationship more about the desires of adults than about the needs—or rights—of children. It teaches the lie that mothers and fathers are interchangeable.

    Marriage through millenia:

    Marriage is the lifelong partnership of mutual and exclusive fidelity between a man and a woman ordered by its very nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of children.

    The word “marriage” isn’t simply a label that can be attached to different types of relationships. Instead, “marriage” reflects a deep reality – the reality of the unique, fruitful, lifelong union that is only possible between a man and a woman. Just as oxygen and hydrogen are essential to water, sexual difference is essential to marriage. The attempt to “redefine” marriage to include two persons of the same sex denies the reality of what marriage is. It is as impossible as trying to “redefine” water to include oxygen and nitrogen.

  • [8] June 27, 2015 at 10:11am

    I’m wondering if the wizards of SCOTUS who magically proclaimed that which is not marriage marriage can now proclaim the poor rich, the starving fed, the ill healthy, the homeless sheltered, the addicted clean.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] June 26, 2015 at 10:27pm

    I am a Texan and reject America.

  • [8] June 25, 2015 at 7:25pm

    Why is she not held out as the poster child of promiscuous behavior. Why is she getting special treatment as someone to be honored. This is the second child she is bringing into a broken, fatherless home.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 14, 2015 at 11:35am

    Why don’t the businesses write up a policy statement and have the customer sign and submit it prior to the business agreeing. or not. to accept the job. In the policy they can easily state they ask certain questions to make sure they have workers available for the event. If no one signs up for the gig then you have no staffing so you turn down the job. If a job is accepted and is found to be other than represented by customer, the business has a right to walk away and the customer suffers the consequences.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] June 12, 2015 at 11:18am

    I don’t get it. Knowing that it is a scientifically impossible to change someone from male to female, why are both TheBlaze and Santorum capitulating and referring to Jenner as other than a male.

    HE is a HE and HE will be a HE until science advances to the point it can change the DNA of a HE to the DNA of a SHE. No amount of disfiguring surgery will change the fact that HE is a HE. HE was destined to be a HE from the day HE was conceived and HE will be a HE until the day HE dies.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] March 17, 2015 at 11:27am

    It is a step in the right direction but I still do not see language in the COTUS that makes it necessary for one to get a license in order to possess arms. Using that reasoning one should necessarily be required to be licensed to speak or practice ones religion, or even be tried by a jury of ones peers, or own property.

    The interpretation that we must do something in order to exercise our rights makes the COTUS a declaration of negative rights to the citizen and positive rights to the gov’t thereby making the gov’t absolute ruler over the people.

    By reading it as such the COTUS is reduced to an inconsistent convoluted jumble of fractured reasoning that comes from the bottom of a bottle of Jim Beam.

  • March 17, 2015 at 11:26am

    It is a step in the right direction but I still do not see language in the COTUS that makes it necessary for one to get a license in order to possess arms. Using that reasoning one should necessarily be required to be licensed to speak or practice ones religion, or even be tried by a jury of ones peers, or own property.

    The interpretation that we must do something in order to exercise our rights makes the COTUS a declaration of negative rights to the citizen and positive rights to the gov’t thereby making the gov’t absolute ruler over the people.

    By reading it as such the COTUS is reduced to an inconsistent convoluted jumble of fractured reasoning that comes from the bottom of a bottle of Jim Beam.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love