By testimony of history he is referring to the validity of long standing legal precedents and the historically accepted meaning of words, and relative to marriage itself, 6000 years of recorded history defining it as a union of opposite sexes, all of which have been rendered meaningless by the court.
But what I find most witless about your comment is the claim that Conservatives have always been on the wrong side of history at every step of progress. Some have, it is true, but at least as many, if not more, Progressives have been also. Some of the biggest racists in our history have been and are progressives; Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ to name just three prominent Progressive racists. Secondly not all that is labeled “progress” is in fact progress. Rejecting principles of truth and natural law, principles that are essential to the growth and vitality of a society is not progress. And opposing the abandonment of such principles is not being on the wrong side of history even if you lose the battle. And when it comes to political philosophies that want to enslave, create subservience, and oppress by use of the State power to compel compliance, none can compare to the Progressive philosophy. Progressives are totalitarians at heart.
 June 30, 2015 at 6:32pm
Is Obama leading the flag burning party?
 June 30, 2015 at 6:31pm
It reminds me of the Ku Klux Klan which reminds me of the Democrat Party and Jim Crow.
 June 26, 2015 at 7:57pm
” it would simply be an acknowledgement that the cause [of the Democrat Party], the cause of slavery, was wrong,” Time to get rid of the Democrat Party battle flag.
YEP - the DEMO's are turning all of us into SLAVES to the GOVERNMENT.
June 26, 2015 at 7:48pm
1. It harms society. Whether it harms me personally is irrelevant. Society exists because of procreation. Rejection of procreation is a rejection of the continuation of society.
2. I didn’t say anything about disliking gay people.
3. Gay people have always had the right to marry just like anyone else. They weren’t denied any rights. They were only prevented from doing what everyone else was prevented from doing.
4. I wasn’t implying the single people should be penalized. Although people shouldn’t be forced to bear children, we should also not make the rejection of procreation a part of our public policy by enacting gay marriage, thereby encouraging and endorsing childlessness. And if it makes you feel any better, I think that anyone who is physically, emotionally, and financially able to bear children within marriage and willfully refuses is also acting antisocially.
 June 26, 2015 at 1:30pm
“They are patriots, they are not asking for a lot.” No, I would say they are asking for a lot. The want social acceptance of their antisocial behavior. They want to be relieved of their social duty to contribute to the creation of the next generation upon which we all depend for survival. These “patriots” should marry a member of the opposite sex and raise families. They inherited life; they should pass it on. Our policies and laws should not be endorsing their antisocial behavior.
Anti-social behaviour is characterized by actions that harm the well-being of others. How, exactly, does this harm you? Why is everybody here pretending that it's a zero-sum game - it just isn't! You're losing absolutely nothing here. If you don't like gay people, just ignore them, don't deny them rights. And as for the "duty of reproduction" business - that would kind of imply that single people should be somehow penalized, wouldn't it?
 June 26, 2015 at 1:24pm
“… those people [gays] are Americans and that is our future.” If that’s true it doesn’t bode well for the future of the country. How long can any nation survive that officially endorses and promotes the rejection of procreation?
 June 26, 2015 at 1:16pm
“it’s hard not to see these people as just wanting the human dignity that the rest of us have.”
If you want human dignity you have to act with dignity. Sodomy is anything but a characteristic of human dignity. Its a perversion of nature and a rejection of the natural order.
 June 26, 2015 at 12:19pm
Consistent with Obama always lying and saying the opposite of the truth we have his statement that the gay marriage ruling is a victory for America.
June 23, 2015 at 8:26pm
I would say that the reason God didn’t tell you his views vis-a-vis gay couples in answer to your prayers was because he had already stated his views in the Bible. Why should he give you a special revelation regarding something about which he had already revealed his will?
And your statement that “whether a person has a relationship with a man or with a woman is so tiny compared to the question of whether or not a person has a relationship with me, God,” is false. We can’t have a relationship with God unless we keep his commandments. He said, “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” So the issue of who we have sexual relations with is a very big deal. To believe that we can reject or ignore His commandments and still have a “relationship” with Him is self-deception. And again, “John 15:10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.” “1 John 2:3-4 And hereby we do know that we know him [God], if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.”
[-1] June 23, 2015 at 7:48pm
Why do you say that John’s description is erroneous? Even today we commonly call meteors “shooting stars,” knowing full well they are not stars. If your friend said to you they saw a shooting star, would you be so pedantic as to lecture him about the difference between meteors and real stars and how it couldn’t have been a shooting “star?” No. You would have accepted what he said as an accurate description of what he saw because you understood what he meant by his use of the commonly used description.
If your attempting to prove that the Bible is erroneous you better pick a different example.
 June 23, 2015 at 7:19pm
Obama just can’t resist insulting Americans whenever he can.
Satan telling Eve that by partaking of the fruit she would be “like” God knowing good and evil is not a demand for equality but a simple statement of fact. A fact confirmed by God himself in Gen. 3:22.
June 20, 2015 at 9:44pm
To the extent that Satan wanted to supplant God he was seeking to be superior to God and take God’s glory. Secondly, what arguments and half truths Satan used on Eve to induce her to partake of the fruit are irrelevant to the issue of whether Satan was seeking “equal rights” for himself.
 June 20, 2015 at 8:54pm
That’s how we honor those families; take away people’s freedoms!