LOL, see AmericanStrega's post, one minute after mine! Perfect. When I'm right, I'm right.
TEA Party... loves Cars... and dislikes the Haters!
Hey Top, I'm not in the Tea Party. I enjoy pre-1980 cars, but still hate Detroit.
Hey fool you sound like you need some help so I'll help you out. I can't speak for all TEA party members but I don't like Detroit because the city is dead,it was killed by a criminal by the name of Coleman A.Young a progressive POS that ruled that city for over thirty years. He was a criminal just like our POS fraud president is today. Young and the unions killed that city and today Barry's finishing off America. Government motors is a partnership between the government and the UAW and any semblance of a private company died years ago,they got a bailout that they shouldn't have and they'll fail again because they make POS vehicles that nobody wants,you're stupid. End of lesson.
Progressive leaders have their favorite cars. Hitler had the volkswagon and Obama had the Chevy Volt. Progressives despise people having many choices. Why would Americans need Corvettes or semi-automatic rifles? Why would Americans need the ability to choose a doctor and they type of insurance that they desire? Why would Americans need to choose the school to send their children to and to use their school tax money at the schools that they choose?
Crap. I guess I'll have to sell my Chrysler then... If only it got the same re-sale value as a Honda.
@Bottom_feeder The Tea Party has nothing to do with Detroit or cars. People with common sense don't want to go near crime-ridden Detroit nor own an electric car that looks like something out of a Dr. Seuss movie. Not to mention the spontaneous combustion of the firebomb batteries and 0% chance of survival if you were unlucky enough to get into a wreck.
TOP! I think you've got this all wrong!!! It's the People who can actually afford a car that like and buy cars. You probably can't, and have to disparage people that can, by associating them with the Tea Party! As far as Detroit goes, people here as well as Tea Partiers, don't hate Detroit. They just refuse to subsidize the mismanagement and lack of talent that has landed them where they are now! It's the same thinking that will keep you in your mommy's basement hurling baseless insults at us all day!
January 15, 2013 at 12:58pm
You sheep will never admit anything positive about the economy under Obama. Math doesn’t matter to you. This is why the tea party is marginalized.
Don't see much "science" here, just a lot of opinion.
man you realy need to get back on your medication
I am sure you were all about the "global cooling" trend back in the 70's too! Just go with the liberal flow, leave the thinking to those of us who are capable and willing.
Well, little Jane is one of yours and has not credibility based on her background and her swindling for US tax dollars. Poor little missguided communists...
WHY DO THEY ALWAYS OMIT INFORMATION
WHY DO THEY NOT OBEY THE LAWS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH?
WHY DO THEY NOT ALLOW OTHERS ACCESS TO THEIR ORIGINAL RAW DATA ?
WHY DOES TOP CON TRIBUTOR NOT UNDERSTAND THIS ?
Let's talk about Obama's "Czar of Science" John Holdren shall we TOE_JAMEATER? He's mentioned in this report yes?
John Holdren was a proponent of "Global Cooling" in the seventies. Ouch...right?
But it doesn't stop there with little Johnny. You see..little Johnny is an alarmist whether it's hot or cold. Little Johnny in his book "Ecoscience" (snappy title right?) says that the American government has the authority to sterilize American women agaisnt their will.
"All the children who are born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the death of grown persons." Did that sink in TOPPY? Obama's "Czar of Science" supports forced abortion and the death of "grown persons." [...] "There exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated...It has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society."
Let me dumb it down for you TOPPY...Holdren believes theU.S. government has the authority to cull it's population to numbers he and his fellow alarmists deem appropriate. And this repulsive denizen of the academic left was chosen by Barack Obama to make the kinds of reports you see featured in this article. You're an idiot and Obama plays idiots like
T . P. : Watch because OWS hates capitalism .
Oh I've got a lot more about John Holdren for you TOE_JAMEATER....
Little Johnny Holdren believes he and his fellow lefty academics and politicians can determine the "optimum population" numbers of the world and he wants to set about culling it's populations...
More from Johnny's book "Ecoscience":
"Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable...The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world.". See that one TOPPY? Johnny wants a one world government that determines not only who gets what and how much..but who lives and who dies. This is the guy who the author of this "climate change report released for public comment" reports to little fella. Obama has appointed a would-be eugencist as "Czar of Science" TOPPY and you don't even blink do you? You're an idiot.
As a scientist, I say you are easily deceived. Go home.
The Tea Party does not hate science, in fact, they do not hate anything or anyone - but they really resent ignorant statements that generalize about their strongly held positions. Climate science in general has been found time and again to be, at best, sloppy, and at worst downright fraudulent. Mother Earth will deal with the climate, changing or not, in her own way, regardless of what humans do. How about this idea...lets remove all the grant money from climate change research and see how many scientists jump off the gravy train. You see, unlike Tea Party folks who will defend their beliefs because they are deeply held, most climate change scientists would move to the next grant money gravy train rather than defend their "beliefs" in the climate. Grant money is amazing, it will buy just about any opinion you're looking for. If climate change is real then we will have choices to make - one of which may be that there isn't a damn thing we as humans can do about it. Sure, we could eliminate 90% of the human population and have the rest go back to the stone age...good luck selling that solution. In the end, Mother Earth will have the last laugh.
DWRIGHT...there's a saying in scientific circles.."no problem..no grants". TOE_JAMEATER is too stupid to understand it.
January 15, 2013 at 12:14pm
Science, tea bag. Get with it.
January 15, 2013 at 10:23am
Zipit, not only does your post make no sense, it loses additional points for using a “mom’s basement” joke. Welcome to the internet?
January 15, 2013 at 9:54am
RKD, they are way more similar than you’d like to admit.
There's a key difference in the two. The Tea Party is actually organized. They have a stance, goals, an agenda(as many negative connotations as that word has). The Occupiers are a disorganized rabble with no clear focus. They're all over the place. "Down with this! Let's fight that! Etc. Etc." It's this disorganization that will eventually bring about their downfall.
January 15, 2013 at 9:53am
It’s the toxic gasses that the wells emit that’s causing these drillers to hallucinate.
I see you've been drinking the environmentalists koolade...
Science, tea bag. Get with it.
Well I dont know they saw but.... Your true colors show in your statement. You show your ignorance by not reading (or at the very least not understanding what you read), and then spuing out nonsense. The drillers saw the same thing as the truckers that were not even on the site. So unless the "toxic gasses" are intelligent enough to seek out the truckers that were driving to that location, it is likely that they were not under the influence of any toxic gas. Furthermore, the picture on the surveilance camera is most likely not of any toxic gas. Okay I will admit I'm not an expert on toxic gas. I doubt whats in the picture is alien in nature, but hey I could be wrong. I guess that is the difference between me and you lefties, I can admit I'm not always right.
January 15, 2013 at 9:32am
@RKD, feel free to substitute “Tea Party” for “Occupy.” I know I do!
January 15, 2013 at 9:21am
Reading comprehension is something you need to work on.
January 15, 2013 at 9:17am
Sensational headline for a non-story. Typical dishonest Blaze tactic used to generate clicks. Taking yet another play from Drudge.