User Profile: TopAssistant

TopAssistant

Member Since: August 31, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] November 27, 2014 at 10:16am

    Why is our DOE have an International Strategy? Start researching how Obama and the RINO/GOP leadership/followers are allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to get involved in Common Core!

    The U.S. Department of Education’s International Strategy International Affairs Office

    Succeeding Globally Through International Education and Engagement outlines the U.S. Department of Education’s International Strategy for 2012-16 and affirms the Department’s commitment to preparing today’s youth, and our country more broadly, for a globalized world, and to engaging with the international community to improve education. It is fully integrated with the Department’s domestic agenda and designed to simultaneously attain two strategic goals: strengthen U.S. education and advance our nation’s international priorities.
    The strategy, which the Department has already begun to implement, will be used to guide the Department’s activities and allocation of resources to reflect the highest priority and most strategic topics, parts of the world, and activities.
    • Succeeding Globally Through International Education and Engagement: the U.S. Department of Education’s International Strategy for 2012-16 (PDF, 1.15MB)
    http://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/internationaled/international-strategy-2012-16.html

    Now read this article! “MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD GROUP TO CONNECT ALL U.S. SCHOOLS’
    Partners with State, Education departments on international initiative” by Aaron Klein, 01/23/2013 on WND website

    Responses (1) +
  • November 27, 2014 at 8:27am

    The Congress controls our national/federal government’s purse strings! In addition, Obama’s Executive Order violates our Constitution in BOTH the Preamble, along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 BOTH requiring them/us to “provide for common defense” of this nation. We are over $17.957 trillion dollars debt http://www.usdebtclock.org.
    In addition, Obama’s Executive Order violates Article 4, Section 4, which states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.”

    “In 1794 James Madison, the acknowledged father of our Constitution, wrote disapprovingly of a $15,000 appropriation for French refugees saying, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” This vision was restated even more forcefully on the floor of the House of Representatives two years later by William Giles of Virginia, who condemned a relief measure for fire victims. Giles insisted that it was neither the purpose nor the right of Congress to “attend to what generosity and humanity require, but to what the Constitution and their duty require.” Read “How Did We Get Here? – When Legalized Theft Becomes Routine, It Pays for Everyone to Participate” by Walter E. Williams, July 6, 2010

  • November 27, 2014 at 8:25am

    The Congress controls our national/federal government’s purse strings! In addition, Obama’s Executive Order violates our Constitution in BOTH the Preamble, along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 BOTH requiring them/us to “provide for common defense” of this nation. We are over $17.957 trillion dollars debt http://www.usdebtclock.org.
    In addition, Obama’s Executive Order violates Article 4, Section 4, which states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.”

    “In 1794 James Madison, the acknowledged father of our Constitution, wrote disapprovingly of a $15,000 appropriation for French refugees saying, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” This vision was restated even more forcefully on the floor of the House of Representatives two years later by William Giles of Virginia, who condemned a relief measure for fire victims. Giles insisted that it was neither the purpose nor the right of Congress to “attend to what generosity and humanity require, but to what the Constitution and their duty require.” Read “How Did We Get Here? – When Legalized Theft Becomes Routine, It Pays for Everyone to Participate” by Walter E. Williams, July 6, 2010

  • [3] November 26, 2014 at 9:16am

    I like this!

  • [22] November 26, 2014 at 9:06am

    I just bought her book, “Live Original” for my granddaughter, both are the same age and both are great kids!

    Responses (1) +
  • November 25, 2014 at 6:01pm

    After working for the federal government for 30-years these employees wake up into a new world each day.

  • [1] November 25, 2014 at 5:59pm

    She is the same age as my grandaughter. Both are great kids. When are we going to see Sadie dolls and get rid of Barbie’s liberal butt?

  • [2] November 25, 2014 at 5:56pm

    I have complained to TheBlaze about the damn autoplay ads but nothing! I only go to TheBlaze now to see the headlines and then I go to Drudge, Breitbart, Shoebat, WND, Washinbgton Free Beacon, etc. I went to AdChoice and listed my e-mail to stop them but it didn’t help. I do not spend much time here now!
    I may try AdBlock.

  • [3] November 23, 2014 at 11:23am

    If they changed the picture to represent Muslim terrorist would it make a difference to anyone? Here is your history question for the day.

    Who said this, to whom, when, why and what have we ever done about it? Would you think these are words of an enemy? Surely, both the House and Senate studied this but where are the reports?

    “The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
    Why are we failing to mention the obvious issues in the 1786 letter that still exists today? Here are the main points in 1786; are they the same today with the Muslim Brotherhood in America and their plan they wrote to destroy us?
    a. “it was founded on the Laws of their prophet”;
    b. “that it was written in their Koran”;
    c. “that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners”;
    d. “that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and”;
    e. “to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and”;
    f. “that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

  • November 20, 2014 at 11:03am

    What a piece of crap!

  • [2] November 20, 2014 at 7:55am

    Tom: Did you request hearings on the Muslim Brotherhood in America and the plan they wrote to destroy us when it was introduced into the largest terrorist financing trial in our history in 2007? Look up H.R.5194!

    Every politician in office and those running for office, no matter if it is for school board, mayor, town/city council, county supervisor, state/national House/Senate or for president need to answer this national security question: “Is the Muslim Brotherhood in North America (MB) (Ikhwan) our friend or foe? Please provide me with links to the source material that provides you with your view(s).”
    The plan the Muslim Brotherhood wrote to destroy us was presented as evidence in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation trial and was uncontested by defense during trial and during the appeals process however, neither the House nor Senate will hold hearings on it! This is a gross violation of their Oath of Office, the Constitution, especially the preamble, along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 BOTH requiring them to “provide for common defense” of this nation. You can buy a copy of their plan to destroy America at Amazon for only $5.00 An Explanatory Memorandum: From the Archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in America or, you can read an online copy here at Center for Security Policy website.
    http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2013/05/25/an-explanatory-memorandum-from-the-archives-of-the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america

    Responses (1) +
  • November 19, 2014 at 6:17pm

    We need a healthy discussion at all levels of government when it comes to our national security! I worked at the highest levels of fire and emergency management/services for over 40 years and I can honestly tell you politicians at ALL levels of government ignore our national security and replaced it with Cultural Marxism i.e. political correctness and the constant pandering they must do to appease the Marxist NAACP, La Raza and other groups plus the USELESS media.
    Our Constitution says three things about the responsibility of the federal government for our national defense. First, “provide for the common defense” is our national government’s top priority; second, our national defense is the only mandatory function of the national government; finally, national defense is exclusively the function of the national government. However, what happens when politicians, at all levels of government, especially our national government ignore their oath of office and our Constitution when it comes to our national defense, our homeland security and the preservation of our Constitution?

    When Muslims die, family members don’t turn to a funeral home or crematorium to take care of the body. In Islam, death is handled much differently.
    Relatives personally wash the corpses of loved ones from head to toe. Often, several family members participate in this posthumous bathing ritual, known as Ghusl.
    Read “Ebola Making A Case For Islamophobia” by Ben Barrack on October 17, 2014 .

  • [1] November 19, 2014 at 5:56pm

    At least he gave us a new name and phrase and that is: “You have been Grubered by the Obama administration which is a perfect example of maladministration, a corrupt AND incompetent administration!

  • November 19, 2014 at 5:46pm

    I totally agree! However, the real term of political correctness was Cultural Marxism and that is what is destroying us, especially when it comes to our national security.
    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America, Nelson Hultberg, July 27, 2010
    - See more at: http://thedailybell.com/editorials/1240/Nelson-Hultberg-Cultural-Marxism-The-Corruption-of-America

    “The United States has undergone a cultural, moral and religious revolution. A militant secularism has arisen in this country. It has always had a hold on the intellectual and academic elites, but in the 1960s it captured the young in the universities and the colleges. –
    Go to YouTube and watch: CULTURAL MARXISM: The Corruption of America
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIdBuK7_g3M

  • [10] November 19, 2014 at 5:25pm

    I totally agree! Look at Obama! He hates whites and he is a half breed Marxist.

  • [12] November 19, 2014 at 5:14pm

    How does a cop know an EDP? I know if I was a cop and someone took my baton away from me and began hitting me with it, I wound have shot also!
    Do we see $$$$ in the families eyes?

  • November 18, 2014 at 9:19am

    Take time to read Coughlin’s excellent Masters’ thesis “To Our Great Detriment” – Ignoring What Extremists Say About Jihad, by Stephen C. Coughlin, Esq.
    Published on July 2nd, 2007

    “In comments made at the National Defense University on 1 December 2005, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Peter Pace explained to his audience the importance of “understand[ing] the nature of the enemy” if we hope to defeat jihadi extremists. Comparing our situation today, with that faced by an earlier generation who had to deal with the reality of the Nazi threat, General Pace suggested a simple solution to complying with his injunction: “read what our enemies have said. Remember Hitler…. He said in writing exactly what his plan was that we collectively ignored to our great detriment (emphasis added).” Just as we ignored Hitler’s articulation of his strategic doctrine in Mein Kampf, so too are we on the verge of suffering a similar fate today, if we fail to seriously assess the extremist threat based on jihadi strategic doctrine.
    http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.176/pub_detail.asp

  • November 18, 2014 at 9:16am

    I do wish TheBlaze would research the United Nations (UN), Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and see how they want to form a caliphate, an Ummah ruled by Shariah/Islamic law.
    Why did Obama sign UN Resolution 16/18 that places Shariah/Islamic law above our First Amendment? Take the time to watch an excellent briefing on YouTube by former DoD/JCS Shariah/Islamic expert Stephen Coughlin. He has made several but start with “Stephen Coughlin, Part 5: The Role of the OIC in Enforcing Islamic Law” and then his other fine briefings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc

  • November 17, 2014 at 9:59am

    Did your USELESS House member co-sponsor H.Res.428? Go to: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/428

  • [3] November 17, 2014 at 9:53am

    Yes, I have personally watched them get off of an aircraft known as Air force One. Do some simple checking to see what it takes and cost to move a president by air.

123 To page: Go