User Profile: Topcat


Member Since: September 01, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] March 14, 2016 at 8:05pm

    It will never be possible to reduce the debt till the accounting system used in Washington is replaced with a standard business accounting practice . You can never reduce the debt , when all you debate on the budget every year , is how much more we are going to spend over last year . When businesses see the government replacing the present accounting system and a viable tax plan no matter how small that is going to be adhered to , reducing the debt , the economy will come roaring back .

  • February 2, 2016 at 6:04pm

    So now we have broke down our election process to a series of Progressive left leaning topics with yes / no answers . The world in reality is not either black or white , yes or no , but that is how millennials have been programmed to see the world . The idea “Most political tools out there are made by politically engaged people for politically engaged people ” is true for a reason . The idea that millennials have lost faith in the media due to bias is a valid one , but their panel of researchers will share the same problem , because elections are not just a group of facts and yes or no questions . There are fine points of policy which must be interpreted by each person individually . Here is an example – 85% of our country consider themselves Pro Life but a sizable portion of those feel in extreme rare cases , life threatening danger to the mother , or psychological trauma due to rape etc , with personal consultation between doctor and patient , abortion could be permitted . In these cases are you Pro Choice or Pro life . Does being Pro Life allow all the rare cases , some of them , or none . As is true of most political views there must be some analysis (soul searching ) on the voters part . You cannot answer these questions with a Yes / No app , based on info from a disconnected panel of millennials , who spend more time in front of their cell phone than experiencing the complexities of the real world . This has the potential to be popular , but no good will come from it

  • [5] November 12, 2015 at 1:18pm

    Bill and Hillary ran Arkansas like a mob family , the corruption and illegal crimes did nothing but fill the Clintons pockets . Finally prosecutors put together the “Whitewater ” case and had the Clintons dead to rights , on all the illegal activity of the Clinton governorship . In a last ditch effort Bill used his many political connections and funds to secure his primary spot to be President , as such he could not be indited . After 4 years in office the prosecutors were waiting , and Bill said and did whatever was necessary to get reelected , after which the case was dropped because too much time had passed . Now again we find the Clintons under investigation for corruption , and Hillary maybe indicted for treason , or at least improper handling of Top Secret intel and documents , putting our country at risk . Now again Hillary seeks to escape indictment by seeking the Democrat Primary candidate for President . I believe the Benghgasi committee will find enough facts supporting , under her supervision , selling guns to rebels of any name to overthrow Assad , that resulted in four American deaths , and the FBI will find enough proof and seek to indict Hillary has committed Federal crimes against our country . The problem is prosecution falls to the DOJ and we all know how corrupt that department is , just look at Holders prosecution . So I feel , again Hillary will avoid prosecution , at least through the election process . If not elected we will see

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 3, 2015 at 3:10pm

    Have you tried to watch online recently ? I have a paid subscription , but changes in both Firefox and Chrome have prevented the stream from being watched since the summer . I have always been able to watch both online and on Roku for years , now I cannot watch online.

  • [3] November 3, 2015 at 2:56pm

    I think that a debate held on the Blaze TV would be tough and fair for all of the candidates . The biggest problem I see is the accessibility to watch the debate . Despite the large viewership of the Blaze , not everyone has access to the Blaze TV . Out of the 14 million viewers , I believe the number was , for the last debate on MSNBC , how many of those interested viewers have access to the Blaze . If the debate was not accessible to anyone who wants to watch it regardless of location , then it does a disservice to the candidates .

    Responses (4) +
  • [7] October 27, 2015 at 3:09pm

    A message to Glenn ,
    I can remember not so many years ago , A Glenn Beck on Fox . What propelled you to fame and fortune was your anti establishment war on government Progressives , and Obama in particular . You united a nation , you were Trump . The Nation hasnt changed still fighting , you have … You have lost ground , with those followers from the beginning , and the American people are still are looking for that leader from the past.
    I am not a fan of Trump or Carson , I cant commit to the idea that Trump , will follow through with all his speeches if elected , and I think Carson Who I respect tremendously , isnt ready for the government bullpen . I feel he would have a tough time , standing upto the Putins of the world and demanding respect , also in a match up against Hillary , I think she will eat him alive in the debates . So my personal vote will probably be for Rubio or Cruz , both have their down sides , but I think both could win , and its going to take more than one President to straighten out Obamas mess , if its even possible .

  • [2] October 19, 2015 at 6:06pm

    I dont know whats wrong with her laughter , I do the same thing every time somebody tells me she is running for President

  • [1] October 13, 2015 at 12:50pm

    Wow a tough choice of giving up charging for a new revenue stream , or the loss of government funding and their whole operation , not a tough decision . Only a Progressive would think that charging money for the mutilation of fetal embryos , that will continue for free by the way , is the only reason the majority of Americans , wants them closed down .

  • October 11, 2015 at 5:19pm

    I was around in those days of McCarthyism . I did a one request search , you can find more information , if you look .

  • October 11, 2015 at 12:49pm

    Wow , this interview shows just how out of touch our media is with history . In the 60s there a huge push to remove the Communists from our government , country and even Hollywood . People were being tried and going to prison , for being a Communist . It became so toxic to be a Communist that the active Communists changed their name to Progressive , same belief same Manifesto just a different less toxic name . Bernie Sanders formed the Progressive Democrat Caucus , 80 Democrat Communist most still active in our current government . When Obama was running for election the connection between the Communists and the Progressives was becoming more evident to the uninformed public , so Sanders softened his ideology name further to Socialist . Now we have Chuck Todd on prime time , thinking Sanders changing his ideology name back to Progressive was actually a move to the right , when in reality he has been emboldened by his poll numbers not to hide behind this phony socialist title any longer. Communism always sounds good till you live under it , and its always the young people that are most misled . Google the facts , you will see I am correct.

    Responses (3) +
  • [53] October 6, 2015 at 5:11pm

    Like so many other Progresive decisions , the problem with their nielsen ratings must be their name , it couldnt be the crappy programming they continue to broadcast on that network . ABC has taken a highly successful Disney brand founded and for years supplying Family entertainment , and turned it into a collection of shows I forbid my kids to watch . Instead of giving hope and an uplifting view that things can be better , they take their viewers into the depths of the street , where there is no hope , and promote that as common place. Thats why there viewership has completely disappeared , not the Network Name .

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] September 25, 2015 at 6:21pm

    Cant blame Boehner completely , even when Boehner and Congress did pass something , McConnell dropped the ball in the Senate . I might even fault McConnell for failure more than Boehner , he has let Reid outsmart him every time a bill got to the Senate . I vote for McConnells ousting next , and a movement needs to be started while we are on a roll .

    In reply to the contribution Good Riddance to John Boehner

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] September 22, 2015 at 3:27pm

    I can discuss a difference of opinion with you , but I will not accept an attack on my intelligence . Let me ask you this , do you agree that the Constitution is the supreme rule of the land , and the Federal laws in our country are created by the people through our representatives in Congress .Then you agree that state laws are arrived at the same way . Since not all the peoples representatives are versed in Constitutional law , the Supreme Court was created to advise them on the Constitutionality of the laws they are passing . It was meant to be the weakest branch of our government , with its creation in the III Amendment . Soon it was evident that the Supreme Court was abusing its intended authority using Judicial Review , so the 10th Amendment was passed , saying the ultimate decision lies with the people and the states. Think about this for a moment , The Supreme Court is filled and maintained by Presidential appointment , for life , yes they are accepted by Congress , but we all know how corrupt that can be .We know on both sides they were appointed based on their ideologies ,not their knowledge of the Constitution , and their decisions are passed with a simple majority .Through this self given power of judicial review the SCUS has given themselves the last and undisputed word in all matters governing our country , overruling the people and Congress . So does Judicial Review seem Constitutional to you ,or are we a country of laws passed by elected officials

  • [1] September 22, 2015 at 12:31pm

    The definition of marriage as , only between a man and a woman has been law in this country for over 200 years , it was further reinforced by the DOMA law passed in the Clinton era . Recently the Supreme Court has ruled the wording of marriage only between a man and a woman is unconstitutional . However since the supreme court cannot create or change law , just offer their opinion , it is up to Congress to act on that opinion to change the law . Since Congress has not changed Federal Law , the law stands as it was written originally. Also in North Carolina the law is specific in their state constitution that marriage is between a man and a woman . That law stands until the legislature in NC change it . So this county clerk is totally operating within both Federal and State law , at this time , despite the Supreme Courts opinion . Lets not make more out of this than it is , a law in this country is law until it is changed , something this administration has a great deal of difficulty abiding by .

    Responses (2) +
  • [23] September 18, 2015 at 2:24pm

    May be so … But when he is right , he is right !

  • [5] September 18, 2015 at 12:17pm

    Look here is what all this BS boils down to . Not all Muslims are radical , and the peaceful Muslims deserve equal treatment in this country . That right however comes with a price , if they wish to live in the US peacefully they must follow our laws , and be part of the process of weeding out the radicals in this country living among them . Since it is very difficult to tell the radicals from the peaceful , only when the radicals are exposed and removed will they get to live the American dream in peace.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] September 17, 2015 at 6:21pm

    I am a day trader for 20 years now and invest in cycles . I can tell you the market is totally separate from the Fed , however the market is driven by speculation , perception , and emotion on a world scale , none of which is very stable. The US has monetized our more than $18 Trillion of debt , by selling Treasury Bonds to big money investors , countries and banks , that have purchased them as safe havens for their money , based on the idea that on the world market there is no safer place to put that money . We have spent that money , so those investors are operating on the confidence that if necessary the US could find a way to pay them back if they need it. The US is paying these investors , interest only payments and the Fed has kept interest rates very close to zero for years now , it has also printed over a Trillion dollars in additional money , which makes those investments worth less than they bought them for , and the payments less. Now say the Fed increases the interest rate 1% now our government would need to pay those investors 1% interest on their investment , adding $1.8 Trillion to budget expenses , just to service the debt . If those investors get the idea that the US cant cover that expense , they will panic as the last safe haven for their money is now at risk .They will start selling their investments ,so as not to be the last one paid , and that will cause the Market will crash .Now you can see why stopping spending and raising our GDP is the only answer

  • [2] September 10, 2015 at 1:32pm

    Carly Fiorina is not drop dead gorgeous , but like most of America she is an attractive woman and keeps herself fit . We are not running a beauty pageant . We are looking for someone who can , take on the hard and sometimes unpopular decisions , someone who can stand up to foreign leaders , without fear , and demand respect , and whose agenda is the betterment and financial recovery of our great nation . Something we havent had since Obama has taken office. Ms. Fiorina does seem to have those qualities , I dont know yet whether she will be my candidate of choice but I do know that if the statement was actually made by Trump , then I see him as no better than many of the petty politicians , who cant make a case for their candidacy ,so they resort to personal petty attacks . I will not vote for those candidates either.

  • [-1] September 8, 2015 at 12:25am

    Loud Pipes saves and snowblown
    There was and is no law that bans gays marriage , and the law does apply equally to all people . What the law , specifically defines , is that marriage is between a man and a woman . And simply put , the SCOTUS has stated that the statement , that the definition of marriage is only between a man and a woman , is unconstitutional . If Congress changes this law , it will redefine marriage vows for millions of families for 100s of years , that have dedicated their lives to having and raising children and passing on the family name for generations , where their only binding force , through tough times was a term and contract called marriage , between a husband and a wife . I am married 43 years to the same woman , I can speak with some authority on this subject . If homosexuals want to live together thats fine , but I doubt you will ever keep any lasting support for calling that marriage . We are living under a totally lawless President and his administration , enjoy your 15 min. of fame , because when he is gone all these ridiculous equal rights conversations will be over , and you all will move back into the shadows , and the world will again regain its God given sanity.

  • [2] September 7, 2015 at 10:58pm

    According to Websters dictionary the definition of marriage is I quote : (1) the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage .
    In the first instance the one most accurate in a dictionary ,we can define the participants as 1: opposite sex , 2: a husband and wife 3: recognized by law
    We can define wife only as a female partner , and husband only as a male partner in marriage .
    In the 2nd definition: the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage .It talks of relationship similar to marriage ,has no recognition by law ,and cannot define its partners, as in the lawful union of contractual marriage.The first definition has been law for more than 100 years , and reinforced by DOMA in the Clinton years , which continues to be law today .The SCOTUS cannot write law , only Congress can , so the SCOTUS does not have the authority to change law , and they have determined that a small portion of DOMA is unconstitutional , that is there job ,and since they cant write or change law, they recommend that it be changed .The law that has been in effect forever is still in effect , until Congress ,acts on that recommendation ,and makes the changes.So at present time all your gay marriages are unlawful and not worth the paper

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love