I didn't want to be in a "crowded" heaven anyway...lol.
Do you believe in Allah?
Atheist. But I am not offended by your belief and I certainly do not hate it. We are both entitled to our own beliefs. Makes me happy I live in America and have that option to share my opinion and not have my head chopped off.
Just another atheist who is wasting his money in the attempt to get rid of God Almighty. Or, you could look at it this way; he is making a large payment in the hopes to escape the damnation of Hell, in somewhat the same way that the Jewish leaders paid a large sum of money to the guards at Christ’s tomb to lie and say that His disciples stole His body. But how could such a thing happen in the first place, when they were supposed to be guarding the tomb which had been completely sealed?
“And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept. And if this come to the governor’s ears, we will persuade him, and secure you. So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.” (Matthew 28:12-15)
I bet he is the one behind the org that is suing every city or cemetery that has a cross in it. Atheist=Satan they are so full of hate they need to just drop on down into that hell that they don't believe in
The only beef atheists have with Christians is that many of them seem determined to turn our country into a theocracy by having their beliefs codified..
How does one hate something they don't believe in? Do you hate purple unicorns? You are an atheist yourself. There are plenty of god's you do not believe in.
So, can we assume by the title on the article that this individual doesn't think atheism is legitimate? Why spend the money? Quod erat demonstrandum...
She’s got a weird double jointed elbow thing going on there. She knows better than to have her finger on the trigger and knows alot better than to have it pointed anywhere near her head I think that’s a still from the hacked version where she shoots herself. The left thinks they are soo clever.
 May 24, 2016 at 11:54am
Thank you Eric, now my opening this story wasn’t a total waste of time.
and not nearly enough voted to repeal, de-fund or otherwise block it. This is a big part of why we now have Trump to deal with. (not a statement on Trump. just an observation) They may not have voted for it but they are still complicit.
Monk, I live in the free state of North Carolina but have the unfortunate luck of working in NJ. Being an avid hunter and gun collector I have done a lot of research up here on the subject of NJ gun laws.And the biggest problem with the gun laws in NJ is the fact that there are so many and they overlap and contradict each other to the point that it’s easier for law enforcement to just arrest you and let the courts figure out if you’re guilty or not. At your expense I might add.
Reading it now for the 3rd time. No vehicles after 1980 will operate. social unrest will start in the first 2-3 days. Be prepared.
Another great book by Wm. Forstchen is Day of Wrath-centered on an isis attack on schools in the US.
Also "Lights Out"
Also, the follow on book, One Year After. Highly recommend both.
James Wesley Rawles has written several decent books on the subject of a post-apocalyptic world.
 January 12, 2016 at 2:58pm
Now that’s a class act.
 January 9, 2016 at 9:29am
And with the Prog’s rewriting history most young people are being taught none of those atrocities really ever happened.
 January 7, 2016 at 6:09pm
When you’re dead you don’t know you’re dead it is only difficult for other people,
It’s the same when you’re stupid!
 January 7, 2016 at 5:47pm
And he will make a great VP for Ted Cruz.
 January 7, 2016 at 9:50am
Why didn’t he ask her what shy has for self defense? I’m betting it’s a semi automatic handgun, the kind she is ignorantly classifying as an “automatic” weapon.
That's exactly what I was thinking. That would have been a very teachable moment but I really don't think she would have listened.
 January 6, 2016 at 11:33am
“An armed society is a polite society”
No, not everyone should “pack heat” as you said but everyone that is competent should be allowed to defend themselves as necessary and as guaranteed in the US Constitution.
 January 6, 2016 at 11:17am
Yes, of course there is and it works every time.
It’s called a “Good Guy With a Gun”
So we all have to be packing heat? I think if we all started carrying guns that would probably increase gun violence. People in a fit of rage might not think rationally.
"An armed society is a polite society"
No, not everyone should "pack heat" as you said but everyone that is competent should be allowed to defend themselves as necessary and as guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Now,apbzy, think very,very carefully…..if there were other people around with guns when “People in a fit of rage” may try to do something exotic, those people could very well foil foul plans of misdeeds. Somehow,though, I think that, no matter how this is painted/explained, you,apbizzy, would never,ever, understand.
 January 5, 2016 at 4:49pm
Sorry for your loss.
 January 5, 2016 at 4:30pm
Here’s a quick recap of how things work now. There are three basic ways online sales can go down:
1) First, if you try to buy a firearm over the Internet from one of the nation’s 130,000 or so* federal firearms license holders, then you have to go through a background check, period. They’ll ship the gun to your nearest licensed dealer. There’s no loophole there.
2) Likewise, if you want to buy a gun online from any seller in another state, they can’t just mail the gun to your doorstep. The Gun Control Act of 1968 strictly regulates direct mail of virtually all firearms across state lines, save for antiques. Again, the seller has to ship the gun to a federally licensed dealer. The buyer would then have to go to that dealer, fill out paperwork, and undergo a background check before picking up the gun.
3) But there’s also a third option. I can check out an ad posted online by a private seller and then meet up to buy the gun in person. (There may also be some situations in which the gun could be mailed within the same state, though not handguns.) That would be a private sale and federal law wouldn’t require a background check — although some states would. California and Rhode Island require background checks for all private sales, while 12 states mandate checks for private handgun sales.
 January 4, 2016 at 4:43pm
It really is, and who cares what “Politifacts” thinks