User Profile: TreeTrimmerJim

TreeTrimmerJim

Member Since: September 03, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • June 30, 2015 at 8:30am

    We are given choices, stand for something or fall for anything.

    Imagine our next generation of parents and civic leaders being trained by a group of people who demonstrate the education, courage and moral guidance of the teachers of Pennsylvania.

    Imagine your children being trained by the dictates of a stranger whose only motivation is the paycheck.

  • [2] June 30, 2015 at 8:19am

    Congress makes laws and government agencies make regulations, with the impact of laws. The supremes are responsible for judging if the law is within the Constitution, no more or less.

    Since agencies are not within the Constitution neither are regulations they create. Neither is judment of the Supremes on regulations within the Constitution.

    Section 2
    1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;–between a State and Citizens of another State;10 –between Citizens of different States, –between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

  • [1] June 27, 2015 at 10:38am

    Certified marriages existed before the Constitution was written.

    There are 17 enumberated powers listed in the Constitution, none mention marriage.

    Each of us, as part of being citizens of what ever state we live in within the United States, is required to protect the Constitution. That means each of us is required to learn the Constitution and make sure no one changes words and meaning of the Constitution without 2/3 of us saying the change is OK.

    There is no court in this land who can define the Constitution but the people. Ultimately We the People ratified it, we must keep our word to protect the individual.

    HIstorically the Supreme Court has a horrible record in showing an understanding of the Constitution. Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson come immediately to mind. The Supreme Court needs to be put back in the basement of the capital where they came from.

    Please take 45 minutes … read the Constitution then decide for youself if marriage or protection from being lonely is even mentioned.

    We need to repeal one state law, compulsory education, then we can begin to teach our next generation how to become parents and leaders of their community. No public school has the priviledge of freedom of education therefore no public school can teach about how to get free and and keep it.

    If you are a school teacher or school administrator speak up… Lets hear how you are teaching about freedom. You don’t have the freedom to do so.

  • June 27, 2015 at 10:16am

    I care what Scalia says.

    Who cares what you say?

  • [1] June 27, 2015 at 10:11am

    Each elected official takes an oath to protect the Constitution. To me that means they must learn the Constitution and protect it as they understand it.

    No one… No one else can define the meaning of the Constitution for them because they gave their unqualified word to protect the Constitution.

    We have now opened the door for Mom’s to marrying daughters and Dad’s to marrying sons as ways to have multiple heads of households and pass wealth generation to generation without inheritance.

    Since certify a marriage no longer protects against incest and only certifies who can claim financial rewards marriage is no longer about families, marriage is another explanation for business partnership. There are no limits on the number of partners in business, should there be in marriage if its only a business arrangement?

    When can a whole community marry a whole community? Then everyone has children and no one has children. Who is responsible for training the next generation of parents and community leaders?

    Show me the word marriage in the Constitution.

  • [1] June 26, 2015 at 1:16pm

    If a civil marrage certificate, marriage certified by a civil authority, didn’t have financial benefits would anyone care who offered the certificate or if any couple even had a certificate?

    Back when incest was a big deal in the community marriage certificates protected the community from in-breeding.

    Today it’s now legal for mom’s to marry daughters or granddaughters and dads to marry sons or grandsons to reduce the impact of inheritance laws by continously marrying the next generation. Soon it will be possible to marry multiple people because there is no consideration for family or off springs so why stop at one or two partners, why not have a whole community marry the whole community in a maze of interconnections that will soon render head of household deductions to everyone many times over.

  • [1] June 24, 2015 at 3:26pm

    Hi Joe,

    Could you have stopped reading “this crap” at any time of your choosing?

    Did you?

    So you chose to read it, you chose to be offended by it and now you want what?

  • [24] June 24, 2015 at 10:52am

    Hey Progressive… Watch who is attracted to this gold coin verses who is attracted to pieces of paper with numbers printed on them.

    Which would you rather be paid with gold or numbered pieces of paper?

    Responses (2) +
  • [15] June 19, 2015 at 1:29pm

    Hey Rook…”How does someone who knowingly had his secretary of State lie to the UN, the world and his country have character.”

    Is your statement knowly a lie?

    You know President Bush had Secretary Rice say… you fill in the quoted lie… because… please support with verifiable facts… . Or you assume it’s a lie. If you are assume, then your statement is a lie at the time you made it.

    Your reason for making the statement is to accomplish what?

  • [14] June 9, 2015 at 4:35pm

    Where did the government, at any level, get its power?

    When the folks walked ashore for the first time there wasn’t a government waiting for them.

    Who setup the local government? The people. Why? To accomplish what individually they could not.

    Who setup the next lower level of government, the state? Local government and the people. Why? To accomplish what individually local govenments and the people could not.

    Who setup the next lower level of government, the federation of states? State government and the people. Why? To accoplish what individually state governments and the people could not.

    Who has the most power in this form of republican government? The people. Why? Because they used their power to setup every level of government.

    The lowest, least powerful level of government is the federal, next the state, next the local and most powerful the people.

    For this system of government to work the people must be educated. It is impossible for a state run compulsory education system to teach freedom of education. Without freedom of education the people can not be free.

    Freedom of education is the prime motivator for settling Plymouth Rock.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] June 8, 2015 at 11:36pm

    “… by purchasing carbon credit”. Hmmm …. who can buy the most carbon credits? Probably not the poorest. So all that cushy stuff is not for the poorest, the third whole countries because they can’t afford the carbon credits.

    It’s karma all over again.

  • [7] June 7, 2015 at 10:13pm

    Looks like a bad situation esculated by zealous behavior.

  • [-4] June 7, 2015 at 9:51pm

    Nice comment until you wrote the second sentence. The sentence my be true in two ways. It tells the truth of events and unfortunately it reveals your character.

  • [25] June 7, 2015 at 11:47am

    Take the time to check drivers license laws for South Dakota. Farm kids can get a license at 14, while city kids have to wait until 16.

    Years gone by were an age when parents prepared their children to be parents. That parenting skill has wained as generation after generation is prepared to be the next generation of parents by our compulsory state run education system.

    We super charged this process in 1965 with the Elementary and Secondary Education Act which select cities called Model Cities to demonstrate the wisdom of education experts guiding an education system. Those most properious cities of 1965 are Detroit, Camden, Newark and Oakland. We can see them at night from the air, they are the black holes in the sea of lights across America.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 7, 2015 at 1:58am

    Pay attention to the “pros” when they hold a bat ready to take a pitch. Most have no clue about the effect of the grain of the wood. Bats break because the grain is vertical. A bat that has the grain vertical bends easily and looses energy that could be transfered to the ball for great flight velocity.

    It’s not that these “pros” purposely hold the grain vertical, sometimes they do. It’s random because they don’t know about wood and just pick up the bat and swing. That is what you do with aluminum bats so it must be what you do with wood bats too.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] June 4, 2015 at 8:48am

    When we allowed our politicians to pass compulsory education laws in each state we replaced the parent with politicians. Seem like a wise choice to you?

    Take control of the education of your child or grand child, work to repeal compulsory education laws.

    Then you, the adults, in your community, will decide what is taught, for what purpose.

    Then you, the adult in your community, will decide if being bribed, by taking federal grant money, is worth the dumbing down of the education of your child.

    Repeal compulsory education laws….. at least read the law, it was written over 100 years ago and is readable.

  • June 3, 2015 at 11:55pm

    If there were no financial rewards for holding a marriage certificate how many people would desire a marriage certificate?

    Without a financial reward a marriage cerificate would be a piece of paper with writing on it that could be purchased at a novelty store. It use to mean this marriage is cerified to be safe for procreating.

    What does a marriage certificate mean now?

    Responses (1) +
  • [19] June 2, 2015 at 12:16pm

    An interesting side conversation would be to ask any attorney, with a doctorate degree in law, if they have ever studied the Constitution. Few will answer that they have studied the Constitution.

    Ask a high school graduate and you will get a similar answer.

    Ignorance of the law is no excuse in court. Our Constitution is one of our four organic laws.

  • [2] May 30, 2015 at 10:45am

    We established our country under Natural Law because of the frailities of man administrating Legal Law when the political winds change. The wind appears to have changed.

  • [1] May 29, 2015 at 10:45am

    If all men are created by our Creator as equals: When two men, with freedom of choice, meet who decides which human is the most valuable?

    Businesses sell their product created by human value and customers pay for the product/ human value.

    The value in our currency system, if not inflated, is determined by the human value it takes to make something valued by others.

    When our currency is just paper with numbers that have no redeemable value, your human value, all those years of study and learning, are being duplicted with a copy machine.

    Can a third party decide the value of the exchange and still believe all men are created as equals?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love