Just like the pilot burnt in the cage the fire leads up to the people on a line of flaming gasoline. Each one gets their own line. It makes it all the way to the legs of the swing set the screen cap is just before it gets there. They are drenched in gasoline so they get engulfed. One struggles when he is on fire until he stops moving.
 August 25, 2015 at 9:22am
The whole thing is for show, voluntary and just kicks the can down the road. This judge is only there for around 6 months because he is at age of mandatory retirement and this order has no law that one can challenge if the DA decides their warrant is still valid. Those with warrants will still have to answer the crime that they got the warrant for. They get a new court date they are need to freely go to court over a warrant that makes the cops drag them to court. If they miss that new one they will then just get a new arrest warrant.
Very few people realize what you just pointed out. Kicking the can down the road is a good way to put it.
[-1] August 16, 2015 at 4:51pm
Not according to Mexican immigration laws That is why they would be splitting up families. The kids would have to immigrate to Mexico as they are not citizen of Mexico no matter where on earth they are born. Only American does that.
that's not true.
if your parents are born in Mexico, you are considered Mexican by birth, regardless of where you are born.
it's right in their constitution:
Trump said he'd work with these families. Never ever being able to vote in lieu of a legal visa for the criminal parents. Kids must take Civic and citizenship classes and ALL must learn English!
also: Canadian citizenship is automatic if one of your parents was born in Canada:
You need to read the Mexican constitution articles3-32-33-34
If born of Mexican parents they will be dual citizens.
 August 16, 2015 at 4:44pm
They cry of breaking up families because the immigration laws of where they came from will not let the kids born in America in. No crying from President Trump will force other countries to change their birthright citizenship and immigration laws. If a kid with Mexican parents is born in America they don’t get Mexican citizenship along with American citizenship. The best example is that no person born from palestinian decent in a Jordan refugee camp can ever become a Jordain citizen. Yet if an person with American decent is born in Jordan they are automatically American.
That's a damned lie. Children born to Mexican Citizens are automatically Mexican Citizens, regardless of where they are born. That's why there are so damned many people here with DUAL Mexican / American Citizenship. I know people who have been American Citizens for three and four generations, yet they always go to their Mexican properties to give birth, so the kids will have Mexican Citizenship and be eligible to own land in Mexico.
Welcome to the stupid room TJ you won your credentials
check out the Mexican constitution articles 31-32-33-34
Any person born to Mexican citizens are Mexican citizens
In the case of being born here in the US they would be dual citizens
If they are left here it is because of the parents choice, then they should jail them for abandonment
August 13, 2015 at 9:49am
Iran does not have to build a nuke equivalent to the million tonnes of TNT, just one with a 21 tonnes of TNT warhead does this much damage and the loss of life would have been more if done on a soft target over the night shift at a ship yard.
 August 10, 2015 at 11:45am
Just how does the whole racial profiling work. A cop looks to see the color of the driver before they pull them over for the traffic violation. If they are white, they don’t pull them over or something but then if they are black they pull them over even if there is no traffic violation. Just how many of the 1500+ acted like Bland and claimed they did nothing wrong.
It seems like way more work than just pulling someone over when they do something wrong. I would think that laziness trumps any racial agenda.
[-3] August 6, 2015 at 1:11pm
So how will this apply to a stop and frisk. The person was just walking down the street not crossing it just walking and the cops do a legal Terry Stop. The cops then find a gun and weed during the frisk and the person is off to jail for years. Why did none of their lawyers use this defense and the stop, frisk and all stops by police were found to be unconstitutional.
How about all the cases of someone who was driving and the cops pull them over for missing a front plate and find 200 pounds of weed in the truck. That would be tossed out because the cops had no reason to look in the trunk for a traffic stop. They have no reason to call a dog to smell the trunk for drugs.
How about the guy that was violated with the butt probed to find drugs. Even if they found drugs they could not use them as evidence as they did not know he could have had them when he was stopped.
This will get over turned on appeal when they go to another judge that can find his butt with a map.
The cops can't just "Terry stop" anyone. They need to have legit reason. That's the problem here. Their reasons weren't legit. Stop and frisk IS unconstitutional when the police don't have sufficient cause.
If the law requires a front plate, then there's a reason to stop but there's no reason to search the trunk just based on that.
A person may not violated with a cavity search without cause.
This will not be overturned on appeal. You seem to be hostile toward our basic Constitutional rights. It's all too common these days among the left-wing, state worshipers.
TJexcite, you are woefully ill-informed–that’s the polite way of saying “you have no idea what you’re talking about,” which really is just a nicer version of “you’re an idiot.” I don’t mean to attack you personally, I just have very little patience for willful ignorance.
Since you want to deal in hypotheticals, let’s do this. In the case of someone being pulled over for missing a front plate, as Since.I.Gave.Up.Hope pointed out, that traffic violation would be the officer’s reasonable suspicion for pulling him over. From there, the cop could arrest the person for any contraband that is in plain view in the passenger compartment, but the more common scenario is one in which the stupid criminal actually consents to having his vehicle searched and the contraband is found in the trunk. And if the officer has consent to conduct a search, there is no constitutional violation.
You’re obviously not a lawyer, so please stop pretending to be.
 August 4, 2015 at 11:52am
Nothing the officer did caused her death and the family is pissed about it as only she is to blame for her death.
 August 4, 2015 at 10:38am
Then support Todd Akin no matter what he says. The GOP establishment pulled out her chair for her to sit down at her senate desk when they tossed Akin under the bus.
 August 4, 2015 at 9:06am
They want full integration of kids with ADHD, autism and other learning difficulties in a class with “normal” kids but no way to handle then when they misbehave in ways that “normal” kids do not. Giving a kid a hug and time out will not stop them from kicking.
$1 dollar condom is somehow cheaper than a $40 dollar pill. Just because it is being used does not mean that all of them having unprotected sex are going to become pregnant if they did not take it. Is there also an increase in STDs if they have the unprotected sex that they need a ‘plan B”.
 July 21, 2015 at 11:49am
Why do I get the feeling that they did more to that car than just log in to the wireless internet system to hack into it.
It would seem on the surface that the solution is to keep the radio\GPS\entertainment system sandboxed from the (computerized) control functions of the vehicle, I'm no expert but see no reason why the GPS or radio would need a usable connection to the transmission control.
 July 20, 2015 at 1:49am
Every murder needs a motive, what would be the reason for the police killed her. If the new autopsy comes back that she died of asphyxiation then what. Go for a third, or fourth until they find some “expert” that can show that she died at someone else hands and not her own.
July 16, 2015 at 9:49am
At WUSA they give the reason. It was being cleaned and not operational at the time, what every that means.
 July 16, 2015 at 9:45am
Had to look at the original source to find out why was he refused to use the restroom. It was being cleaned. That is a dumb reason to have the whole male restroom closed unless it was flooded. It still does not explain why he needed to ask. See the male closed and it is an emergency would anyone have issues if the dad had to take his little girl to the women’s, if they could see the men’s is out of order.
July 8, 2015 at 10:32am
The first paragraph should be rewritten. “but he didn’t quite have enough time to jump off the tracks himself.” implies that he got hit and killed by the train. Which I thought he did until I read farther on. He has all the time he needed to run to safety. Something along the lines that.. A grandfather heroically rushed to save a toddler who had fallen in front of an oncoming train, but he was unable to jump back onto the the platform himself, so he was forced to run to the end of the station’s track to avoid the oncoming train.
 July 2, 2015 at 2:38pm
The incompetence comes that they should have been sent to the shredder over the trash bin, not that they were never cashed. The city would never let people not pay a bill because they never cashed the check. The bill is not paid until the check clears and if no one cashed the check the bill was recorded as not paid in time and late fees are added.
If one sends the city a check even a large bank for 57K and the money is never withdrawn from the account, they would be contacting the city to wonder if the check was lost in the mail. Even the person who paid $50 would be contacting the city about the missing payment.
No, the incompetence comes in reading comprehension. The checks were found in the dumpster still in their unopened sealed envelops. So they could not have been scanned or processed.
Probably part of their program to force businesses to pay late fees and penalties under the claim they didn't pay on time. Most likely a state employee goofing off realized they had fallen behind during Christmas holidays in processing work and tossed them to hide the evidence knowing they would get rebilled later.
[-2] July 2, 2015 at 4:28am
Just how is he going to check if someone in line to buy a thousand dollars worth of tools is gay. It is not like the color of skin or the pink star the fuhrer made them on their chest. Random hate is the worst kind of hate and no where near bible country.
Their breath will smell like poo from eating poo-peanuts.
Easy, you make them wear a rainbow colored star on their shirt.
Sorry bud, you can't spot all gays but there are quite a few that there is NO question about their orientation.
 June 30, 2015 at 5:10am
Just a run of the mill nematodes and a yuppy who thinks fish is created already in the Styrofoam trays. Blame the store for the likely wild caught fish for having parasites. Live parasites That added to the freshness. At least the fish was not twitching like the other viral video of the twitching slab of beef. When they cooked it all the other parasites deep in the flesh would have woke up after being in the cold and started to come out until they died in the frying pan.
i really don't see why this is a story some fish have parasites if the store notices they wont sell it and if they miss it they will happily replace it ive known several people that would have just cooked it a bit more and still eaten it
Parasites cooked are just extra added protein, but they should have been labelled as an extra ingredient. You don't want to upset the FDA.
This is common for meat cut from around the belly & above. Soak the filet in salt water & they come out on their own. you know they lay eggs too.