The dog takes minutes to figure out the solution that any beaver in the woods ( take your minds out of the gutter) knows how to do instinctively. Wow! Impressive! Of course in light of the fact that it took dogs two million years to figure out how to lick their own rectums . . … . .. ..
What’s impressive is that you believed someone when they told you “it took dogs 2 million yrs to figure out how to lick their own rectums."
must be a cat owner.
May 22, 2015 at 9:58pm
My Wife and I visited the fort two years ago. It is an interesting place on a lovely, but tiny island. Sadly, the fort is falling to pieces and the parks service cannot afford to repair it. We too saw the ‘secret’ rooms and the good doctor’s cell. Perhaps the most interesting thing there, is the large machine used to heat cannon shot to cherry red, so that it would set fire to the enemy’s wooden ships. The era was past and the men who designed the fort didn’t know it.
 May 22, 2015 at 9:47pm
I rather doubt , even if he has the equipment, and even if it works, that he knows what to do with it. If there is a child in their future, it is reasonable to assume that they will steal that too.
[-3] May 22, 2015 at 9:28am
Hoo-boy! Grown up people arguing that “my imaginary old guy floating around on a cloud dispensing magic is ‘real’ and your’s isn’t!”
When you grow up you can comment about what we do.
 May 22, 2015 at 9:13am
I think that the real point here is that the school chose to use some of their scarce funds to buy ‘T’ shirts rather than invest in, allegedly, much needed school supplies. If the shirts were donated then one must ask why was such a donation source wasted on ‘T’ shirts instead of needed school supplies?
The schools in general have too much money. It's just poorly allocated.
 May 20, 2015 at 8:31am
“Does anyone think we can recover from what the little king and his minions have done to this country?”
You recovered from the defeat of 1812.
You recovered from the great depression.
You recovered from Pearl Harbour.
You recovered from Vieitnam.
You recovered from the Clintons.
You recovered from Carter.
Obama is a little man with no character and a warped agenda. He has damaged your country. He has made it the laughing stock of the world. He has begged and bowed, humiliated and embarrassed your country. But you will recover from this black period in your history.
Sir Winston Churchill, facing the Nazis alone for two years said it best;
“Bowed, but unbeaten!” and so you are.
 May 19, 2015 at 4:59pm
Hill is the finest example of a racist black man. You already know what garbage is going to spew out of his mouth and can save a lot of time by changing the channel. He will use any deflection to save himself from real debate.
 May 19, 2015 at 4:25pm
” . . . . attacked by a convicted sexual predator without warning.”
What a bloody nerve! The very least he could have done, was call a few days earlier and make an appointment!
 May 19, 2015 at 4:16pm
So, just how big does your ego have to get, before you get a selfie stick? I’m sick to death of selfies all over the bloody place. Get your egocentric, narcissistic, attention seeking ego under control. Nobody is interested in seeing your face plastered all over the internet but you.
“discipline” Yes. But not treatment like the gestapo used if he had been found planting a bomb under some French railroad! Schools are there to build the mind not crush the spirit. What’s next; teachers dressed in uniforms demanding that students submit.
“You papers please? So! You have relatives in grade six? You would be very foolish to act out again! We have ways of making you conform. You will be a good socialist. Ya?!”
 May 18, 2015 at 10:46pm
“CHEESE ‘N EGGS, WITH GRITS, RAISN TOAST, A SIDE OF BACON, COFFEE AND A LARGE O.J.’
The only way to start the day on the I-95, south bound.
 May 18, 2015 at 9:08am
The truth is, that without ‘rap’ both of these people would be working at ‘Dollar General’.
LMAO!! I must add, I don't believe they are quite that qualified....
Both these crack heads would dead or in the joint
You mean they'd be using their EBT's at Dollar General.
I actually like Dollar General, and no job should be beneath anybody in this economy. I'm just wondering how much money was sent to the store owners who lost everything. When will these people rally for someone who isn't a drug pusher or a thug?
No, they'd be gang banin' and whoring, respectively. Actual jobs are beneath them (too much brains needed).
 May 17, 2015 at 11:26pm
Blood sucking leaches both.
 May 16, 2015 at 9:12am
The Pope has clearly ‘lost it’ and only serves to illustrate the irrelevance of the Catholic church in the modern world. We have seen the effects of physical malaise on various Popes over the years. Perhaps we are now seeing the effects of mental malaise on an elderly gentleman.
No, it has nothing to do with his age. It is simply a bad case of the mental disorder called "Liberalism". He has spent more time traveling and attracting massive crowds with his leniency and liberalism and cohorting with the likes of Obama that he has no time for prayer or meditation.
How does his psychosis illustrate the irrelevance of the Catholic Church? If anything during these times of turmoil and attacks on Christians world wide the church is now more relevant then ever. Because more and more are turning their backs on the church, the church is needed more.
People need G-d, but the Catholic Church with these kinds of leaders is obviously not representing him, very well at all.
 May 16, 2015 at 9:03am
“How much do you really know about the greatest nation on Earth?” I know a lot about the ‘greatest nation on Earth’. Apparently I know quite a bit about yours too as I managed to ‘ace it’.
[-14] May 15, 2015 at 8:53am
So either you believe in a world governed by magic, or a world defined by science. One logical the other, not so much.
"So either you believe in a world governed by magic, or a world defined by science. One logical the other, not so much.
This is about G-d VS pseudo science, having nothing to do with magic.
Bringing in magic is making a strawman argument.
So the scientists say that in the beginning there was nothing, nada, zilch...not a single thing! And then nothing, exploded...creating 11 TRILLION stars for every man, woman and child on the planet! But YOU don't believe in magic, right? Also, why can't you logical folks explain why there isn't a single, solitary transitional fossil found anywhere on the planet? Not one! According to crazy uncle Darwin there ought to be millions upon millions of them, what with all those chance mutations going on and all, and yet there isn't ONE! Sure sounds logical to me! On the other hand I look around at God's creation and I see absolute perfection; from the flowers and the bees, to an eagle taking flight and the beauty in my daughters eyes. To try to believe that all of this stunning beauty came about by accident and without a guiding hand is just folly. So you go ahead and stand by your faulty "logic", I'll stick with God.
You don't get to set the terms of someone's beliefs. I believe in a God bigger than you. You are free to disagree all you want with every God given breath you take.
Every fossil is a transitional fossil, as natural selection works through the passing down of genes. Fossils in general are actually rare, and a missing link is no longer needed as the only diffinitive proof of evolutionary change through natural selection. Most people who have a non-biblical view, I believe, have no idea what came before because there was no time and the concept of nothingness is alusive to human understanding. One famous atheist scientist has a book offering the answer that the nothingness before cosmic existence actually is not nothing, as oridinarily defined. Shall I go on or clarify my statements?
Troonorth, you are absolutely right. Darwinists believe a fairy tale that goes something like this: “Once upon a time there was nothing and nobody, then all of that nothingness magically exploded into everything after nobody did anything, then all of the bits and pieces of nothing that had exploded into everything magically became beautiful galaxies and in one of those galaxies a magical planet formed where everything was dead and out of death sprang life.” Creationists, on the other hand, believe in an ordered Universe governed by God's laws of Thermodynamics. It's so cute how Darwinists think that it’s science to believe in things that have never been observed, nor repeated.
I guess it comes down to how one defines logic.
What you call logical, some chemicals with no appearant starting point sloshed around in a big bowl of primordial soup then created the universe, I call non-sense.
Oh so you get to define the perimeters is that it? The number of intelligent design adherents, they're just backward cavemen praying to the fire God? What nonsense. It's you that has the simplistic argument. I personally have no idea how the universe was begun, neither does anyone else alive including all your oracles of the church of athiesm.
No I actually I don't. How about you reference their name and work. I got a feeling you'll bore and annoy me beyond interest with pretentious rantings
science has said a lot of things that have been proven false. More investigation has proven that the Big Bang could not have happened by science. So, the Big Bang is now a man made myth according to quantum math. This kinda throws the 'Theory of Evolution' into questionable category as far as timelines. Yet, Dawkins still holds to his version.
Logic is based on information, information leads to conclusions, if the information is wrong the conclusion can't be right. That is the problem with Theories in general and this case in particular. I don't believe in the theory of evolution. There doesn't seem to have happened to other critters besides 'monkey like ancestors'. Mutation and adaptation happens to everything... Dawkins wants me to think that a rock and some air got together and formed life... under special conditions. Then thought itself into a higher life form. That excuses a creator. Never seen it done. Like a toaster willing itself into an iphone.
So, supernatural isn't magic. Magic is a trick and a trick is illusion created by man. Supernatural is the unexplainable to current knowledge and science... such as the creation of the universe, the cause of life... Every thing we have and have experienced is a derivative. We can not create something from nothing. So, we ether accept Dawkins theory of life creating itself out of inanimate objects (which we have never seen or been able to produce in science) Or we are to believe the supernatural happened.
Which one or all of my statements from that post? Is there one you would like to focus on to save time?
Also, you don't want me to go on, but you want me to provide you with more information?
Hey Troonie! Here are some quotes for you.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
"Any sufficiently explainable magic is indistinguishable from science."
"Nobody knows what energy is. As far as we know, it's just magic by another name. We can measure it and detect its flow, but we still have no idea what it even is."
Not trying to reply to your whole post, but I do want to point out that true conclusions can still be reached by false presuppositions.
atheist- may be able to reach a true conclusion, but that would be accidental, not by following the truth or logic.
 May 12, 2015 at 8:39am
Please do not blame our (Canada’s) ‘This Hour Has 22 Minutes’ for coming up with one mildly funny skit in 20 years. The truth is that ‘THH22M’ is the product of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation , the CBC, which is fully funded by the Canadian tax payer to the tune of 1.7 billion dollars. Most Canadians reject the CBC’s uber left agenda and what you see here is the result of a room full of second rate writers toiling like those proverbial monkeys over type writers. Like the Monkeys, they eventually produced something mildly funny, the good writers having left for the U.S. where they now write for, ironically, SNL.
I thought "This Hour Has 22 Minutes" went off the air long ago,to be replaced by "Little Jihad on the Prairie."
 May 11, 2015 at 8:43pm
So the captain of an Iranian ship is the one with the beard, eye patch and parrot on is shoulder right? Does that mean that they have taken over Disney Land?
 May 11, 2015 at 8:37pm
Silversmith, most of us, who read the Blaze and other news sources do not need to have every situation completely explained to us. Most of us have the ability to absorb the available information and synthesize our own opinions and ideas. It is what separates us from liberals who need someone to make up their minds for them. When an airplane falls from the sky, we don’t need to be told that gravity has something to do with it.
Apparently you do.
 May 11, 2015 at 9:08am
OK. let me explain this. It is very simple really. As the number of Jew hating muslims goes up in any given country so does the anti-Semitism. It is happening in every western nation.
Honest math is racist you know. Same crap here with NOI and moldy fringe BOTs; and muj-man and (j)anet and a few sundry posters that have a new handle ever month or two. Liberal Jews are coming right more and more every day though.
Along with muslims, liberals should be peaceified.
Nowhere in this article is Islam mentioned.
This is caliphate on the march. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Islam isn’t a religion it is a competing governmental group just like communism or socialisam. No one should tolerate the idea that they are a religion and therefore should be accomodated. The notion that it is a religion is the crack in Pandora’s box through which they are establishing beach heads (bases of operations) in countries and plot to devour them from within.
Hitler was fond of Islam... Help rename Persia to Iran - Farsi for Aryan.
The German Neonazis haters aren't islamic, but they did and do align themselves with this scum. A lack of self respect seems to pervade both groups. Our Democrats are very much like these folk. Even the self hating Jewish marxist Democrats.
Which humans have a longer period of co-existence in the regard framed in the blog-post:
1. The Europeans;
2. The Arabs; or
3. The Americans?
Hint: There is a history of The Europeans being intolerant in addition to the Arabs being intolerant.
I'm pretty sure the Jew-hating is kind of a long-standing tradition in Germany. Has nothing to do with Islam. You would be right if you were talking about France or England, but Germany kinda has a reputation for anti-Semitic behavior.
you forgot to say "and increase muslim emigration back to the deserts, too.".
Agreed, for the most part, but Germany has had its Neo Nazi problem since the day after Berln fell to the Russians. Hell, the last "Werewolf" (World War Two holdouts, trained and briefed to conduct espionage, sabotage and assassinations back DURING the war) operation took place in 1957 ! They're still searching for Nazi War Criminals, and those putzez have been driumming-up support for the Neo Nazis for seventy years.
Openly militant minorities are a "protected class" in western society. It's the reality of the world we live in. You can hate on the Germans all you want, but it solves nothing.
. There's more to it. European media has demonized Israel for a very long time.
Muslims probably add to the anti-Jew mentality.... But come on....Germans have fostered a deep hate for them in the past and if not suppressed it could get out of hand....again.
Troonorth, my thoughts exactly. Could not have said it better myself. The real question is, why aren't they showing that fact? Too afraid of being labeled 'zionist' and 'Islamophobe' while they are harassed by the same people putting the labels on them?
One thing I have noticed, Israeli Jews are not afraid to flex their muscles and jump into a fight. 'Western' European-American Jews are the opposite. I suppose the difference may be in fighting for your home and land once you are in it as opposed to fighting in a strangers home.