Cruz would probably hate it..Being Canadian has obviously has twisted and distorted ideas destroying his judgement..Just have to look as the last guy he pushed and backed with every fiber of his Canadian being ..Roberts lol..Cruz is a worthless 100% progressive globalist POS Wolf dressed in “Constitutional” clothes lol..Well as always the Wolf fooled a bunch of idiot sheep…BAH.
Silverhammer, my guess is, "You didn't vote for Cruz?"
Cruz has little say so now.
I suggest you get on the train or start sucking hill's pant-dress?
Who gives a S&^T what Lyin' Ted thinks..Evidently Trump has "Common sense" enough not to put a Bush Farm NAU open border destroy America policy adviser and useless settlement attorney on the bench. I think the list contains all full born Americans...Better than seeing Border jumpers on the list..
Hi Monk...I'm sure we'll know soon enough.
dsind...what an idiotic statement. What did you read that made you think you should assume anything about me or who I will vote for?
I would too. I suspect Mark Levin knows exactly and will probably comment on the list. To the Trump cult getting all wet at the thought that Trump will do what they hope. Hope isn't a strategy, we've seen that over the last seven years. Trump has spent many years greasing the current "establishment" types. Anybody who thinks he isn't with the "in" crowd doesn't get why they wanted Trump over Cruz. They fear Cruz.
Just tune in to Beck tomorrow...He and the clones will find a way to twist all this to their own hate Trump agenda.
True American666, "dsind…what an idiotic statement. What did you read that made you think you should assume anything about me or who I will vote for?"
How about this statement from earlier on in this thread? "Swaltizka, sorry Humpty-Trumpty-Troll I am still #nevertrump and will not be fooled by Don the Con and his “constitutional” values. Everyone has been asking where they are and LOOK< magically> they have appeared. You are a fool to believe this NYC liberal."
Judge Napalitano has said that all on the list are true conservative judges and are original intent Constitutionalists and he said that Trump is going in the right direction on most everything, so I say, Stop with the #NeverTrump and get on the #NeverHillary train. Mitt Romney? Jeb Bush? Who are they to sit there and tell the voters that they know better? This is a government of, by and for the people, not of, by and for them. They were against Cruz also, but they knew that with Cruz, they would be able to hold onto their power, but not with Trump. They have killed their chances of ever being relevant in politics going forward.
Cruz is irrelevant and has lost. It doesn't matter what he thinks of the list.
Really..post the link because EVERYTHING I find about the Judge talking about Trump is that he is screwing it up, especially on Immigration. About the only think the Judge likes about Trump is the way that he messes with the MSM and caused all the Party Leaders to freak out....
To what TrueAmerican66 said and please don't take this the wrong way True:
Why does it matter what Ted Cruz thinks about it at this point?
Now in my opinion we should be interested in doing our own research on these judges? and be interested in what we think of them? Not what Glenn Beck or Ted Cruz tells us to think by telling us what they think about them. That's lazy and dangerous because it makes us just like the Leftists that can't think for themselves.
I for one like Thomas Lee of Utah and Don Willet of Texas a lot since they are both like minded replacements for Antonin Scalia and there for good replacements in my book for any of the other judges on the Supreme Court as well, but especially for any of the Leftist leaning ones.
So as far as I am concerned I like the list very much just for those 2 names alone.
So how about you True? What do you think about the list? You buddy not Ted or Glenn.
Please don't take it in an offensive way it's not meant that way.
Doubt Cruz would have any complaints about Senator Mike Lee's brother, Thomas Lee.
VRW, There is no link yet, I just watched him on Cavuto.
"MadAsHell" I also saw the interview with Judge Napolitano on Fox News not too long ago and thanks for what you said in our other conversation yesterday.
I agree with it completely. What amazes me the most is how some people that claim they are puritanical conservatives still stick with this #NeverTrump thing even though it's being led by RINO's like Mitt Romney, John Boehner and the like, which are and always have been far from conservatives.
These are the same people who refused to vote for Romney because he wasn't conservative enough for them and we got 4 more years of Obama and now men able to use women's bathrooms, locker rooms and showers (and today dressing rooms at Ross Dress for less in DFW, TX) and the Iran deal etc.
And now they want Hillary Clinton in the white house because Trump isn't conservative enough.
These people are not conservatives they are the most Leftist people in our country if you think about with a clear mind.
So you need Ted Cruz's permission to have an opinion now?
Dear ignorant Ted Cruz haters,
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz is a member of the Committee on the Judiciary. Since you do not know what that is… ANY pick by Trump would have to appear and testify for his job to none other than…. Ted Cruz, who is also CHAIRMAN of the Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts in the US Senate. So Cruz can approve or stop, or filibuster any of Trump’s selections twice AND he can decide if we really need to replace Scalia or just leave the court as is with eight members.
PS: For those who want Ted Cruz to comment about Trump’s picks now, I’d say he probably won’t because he knows he will have to decide their fate officially sometime next year.
I want to hear Ted Cruz’s opinion – he still is my senator. I am interested in learning the truth about these potential candidates – not just 1 man’s opinion.
Buddynoel, I don’t hate Cruz, I think he is a good Senator, would make a good Supreme court pick, I just am a Constitutionalist through and through, but the Founders were so adamant about the President being a Natural Born Citizen, that they put that in Article 2 of the Constitution. I would never willingly violate the Constitution ever. I know that there are legal scholars, most from Harvard who thinks Obama is a Constitutional scholar, but the law is the law.
Black’s Law Dictionary, eighth edition (1999)
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”In United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the Supreme Court relied on English common law regarding jus soli to inform the meaning of “citizen” in the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the natural-born-citizenship requirement of Article II, and noted that any right to citizenship through jus sanguinis was available only by statute, and not through the Constitution. ”
You see, the U.S. has always followed Jus soli in determining birthright. Under Jus soli, Cruz is Naturalized by law and falls short. Sorry, but that is the way it is.
"dsind…what an idiotic statement. What did you read that made you think you should assume anything about me or who I will vote for?"
are you voting for ted cruze?
Sooo, you saying there is a chance...find some batteries for your math calculator.
You know, I want people to learn the difference between Naturalized citizens and Natural Born, so for those of you who do not know, this is a very good site to learn:
@ MadAsHell -
I found this article to be of value:
1. “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.” – Section 212
2. “The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.” – Section 212
3. “I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.” – Section 212
4. “These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers;” Section 213 pertaining to “inhabitants” or foreigners allowed by the state to settle and stay in the country.
5. “It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed. (59) By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular,”
- (There is much more, but I do not have space here.....)
What did you do to get action against Obama?
I voted for Cruz and supported him, but I would NEVER look to a presidential candidate I support for permission to have an opinion nor for guidance on what opinion to form.
I expect of myself to research every subject SCOTUS nominees included & to form my own opinion and then to check the person I support to see if his opinion matches mine.
When we start looking to that person we support for guidance on what opinion to form blindly our country and our movement and we ourselves are in deep trouble.
That is when we are no longer able to think for ourselves and we become blind followers just like those "low information" voters we talk so much about on the other side.
I hope that others on the right feel, think and act the same way and form our own opinions rather than look to Ted Cruz or Donald Trump to give us permission to have an opinion or to tell us what opinion to have and like good little robots we automatically have the opinion Ted Cruz tells us to.
And in my opinion Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen and there for eligible to run for the U.S. presidency.
Why do you need to know Ted Cruz's thoughts? Do you need him to tell you what to think? Do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
Mad i found this by the Congressional Research Society
CRS says: "The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term 'natural born' citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship 'by birth' or 'at birth,' either by being born 'in' the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship 'at birth.'"
There is no requirement of two "citizen-parents," CRS found.
deanbob, What was there to do against Obama on Natural Born Citizen? He produced a Hawaii Birth Certificate. You show proof that it is not real, then something can be done. Sheriff Joe tried, but was not successful.
Trenton, I never said anything about two parents, It has to do with Jus soli (a Latin term that means law of the soil) and jus sanguinis (a rule that a child’s citizenship is determined by its parents’ citizenship). The U.S. has always recognized Jus Soli in determining birthright.
Pursuant to 8 USCS § 1401, the following persons can acquire citizenship by jus soli:
A person born in the U.S., and subject to its jurisdiction.
A person born in the U.S. as a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.
A person of unknown parentage found in the U.S. while under the age of five year. The person can remain a U.S. citizen if it is not shown before s/he attains twenty five years that the person was not born in the U.S.
A person born in an outlying possession of the U.S. (i.e., including Puerto Rico, the Panama Canal Zone, Panama, the Virgin Islands and Guam.) of parents, one of whom is a citizen of the U.S. who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person.
Go here to read more: http://definitions.uslegal.com/j/jus-soli/
MadAsHeII “read?!?!?!” you can tell each of the Trump supporters have never cracked a book once in their life. My IQ took a beating reading their “arguments”.
Levin had a different take on this last night. he just opened the phone to see if anyone believed that Trump will actually follow through with this. but he also pointed out that the media reporting this has actually twisted Trumps words. they say he will pick from this list. he says he will pick from a list that look like this list. a weasly way out. apparently (i dont follow circuit judges on a daily basis) they all are very good and if chosen would be great judges. the real question is can trump be trusted that is it.
bigtex40, Legal Studies 3.87 GPA. I could care less that a low IQ person is trying to accuse me of having a low IQ. It is easy for Benedict Arnold's to think Trump is lying, but still it is disingenuous.
Let's put all of this aside, I can see Trump's son, Donald Jr., putting himself out there and I can only guess that he is setting up for a run in the future. I do not think that Trump would back off on such Yuuuuge issues to Republican's as that would ensure his son would never have a chance. You #NeverTrumpsters are a bunch of bias, bigoted traitors to your party, country, military and veterans if you continue to help Hillary, who we know is a liar and will succeed in changing the 2nd amendment. If we lose that amendment, we will go to war and a lot of people will die and the U.N. will win. So, #NeverTrump will be responsible for the end of freedom.
@MadAsHell - You are still an ignorant lying little tool. You are not above using half-truths and outright lies to support your version of "true conservative". It is you and people like you that have given us the choice between a lying, narcissistic progressive and a lying, narcissistic progressive. This is totally on you and your's. Deal with it.
Let me help you out with a quote from a fellow TrumpRumper, "GFY!"
 May 16, 2016 at 1:39pm
…and “The Government of National Accord….” what the hel! is that?
Worse how? And when Obama leaves office and ABSOLUTELY NONE of all those paranoid delusional predictions come true, will you and your ilk finally realize that your all paranoid and delusional?
We should have a humongous parade with confetti from tall buildings in NY city.
The guy is so envious of Trump attention he can hardly stand it trying to finish us off first.
Confetti for Trump.
Eat dirt for Obama.
 May 5, 2016 at 9:36am
The cocker spaniel is off the front porch, and the pit bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals,” and the likes of Chicago shyster David Axelrod along with international socialist George Soros have been pulling the strings on their beige puppet and have brought us Act 2 of the New World Order. The curtain will come down; but the damage has been done; the story has been told.
Those who come after us will once again have to risk their lives,their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to white guilt and political correctness…
 May 5, 2016 at 9:35am
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water twice because the flow that has passed will never pass again. Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Florida, in January 2015, when he said America will not come back. He wrote: The American dream ended on November 6, 2012 in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest republic in the history of mankind.
A coalition of blacks, Latinos, feminists, gays, government workers, union members, environmental extremists, the media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell’s America.
You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take zealots, not moderates and shy, not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will probably never again be able to legally comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.
 May 4, 2016 at 1:12pm
I agree totally. In my book, Kasich is the reason Trump was able to sidestep a one-on-one debate with Cruz and the reason Cruz wasn’t able to break Trumps momentum. Kasich should be held high in the Democrat party for biggest assist. I’m sure Boehner and his buddy Kasich are patting each other on the backs today…disgusting lot. They sold America to the highest bidder and that bidder was crony establishment traitors.
Its about time for Kasich to quit the race for President... Pocket his winnings and step down. What good did Kasich present other than joining up with the lying Cruz looser...
What more did the news find on lying Cruz. Some lady come forward pregnant, or $500,000 hush money revealed was true and found to be a crime or Cruz father was part of the Kennedy assassination or more dirt on Lying Cruz father gov tax scandal or did some delegates come forward and say that Lying Cruz paid for their support...
For sure Lying Cruz will never be re-elected again in Texas as a senator.
 May 3, 2016 at 1:11pm
I tried too. I really did, but when it became clear her only real issue is that she was outed for being arrested (which she was trying to keep private) and not having been able to stop the free speech of others, I quit reading.
This was a junior attempt at writing a lawsuit (“pre-law” and “political theory”). MAYBE, just maybe if she spent as much time on her studies of real, important issues like the economy, the lack of justice coming from our justice dept., and the communists that are trying to take over the country, as she did on writing that 5000 word thesis, she could make something out of herself instead of being another “offended” child.
He still has his johnson so I guess it depends on what facility he uses at the time.
Transmen prefer to sit down. They feel they are a woman and they want to act like a woman. They are not 'good friends' with the penis if they still have one. They hide it at any given chance.
 April 25, 2016 at 9:36am
A lot of people have brought up the fact that they won’t vote for Trump if he’s the eventual nominee. I just want to put something in perspective.
Justice Scalia’s seat is vacant. Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is 79, Breyer is 77, and Thomas is 67. Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.
These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.
Think about that… 7-2. If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation. And 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are seemed to be lacking in mandate.
Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.
Everyone saying that they won’t vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize this. If Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another Conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life. Ever.
Assuming Trump would nominate a conservative...
There is one singular choice if the makeup of the SCOTUS is concerning and it isn't Donald Trump.
This is true if Trump were to win as well and he openly tells you this.. Trumpers just close their ears
I would plug my nose and vote for Trump, if I had any real hope he would help us on the SCOTUS, but I don't have that hope and so for Trump I say nope. (Sorry about the Dr. Seuss)
Trump's judgement is just as scary as Hillary's
If anyone tries to take our guns away, that's going to spark a civil war. The right to bear arms is one that will not be surrendered peacefully.
I appreciate your thoughts, it is the most important point of this election--and is precisely why the Trump supporters need to pull their heads out of that -sses and get behind a guy who has the judgment to nominate conservative judges to the constitution. Trump has no experience in that arena, does not respect the constitution, and has as bad judgment as Hillary on this matter. Wake up America--Trump just went on GMA stating he thinks it's ok for a man to enter the womens restroom if that's what he "identifies as". You think someone who doesn't have the common sense to nail that issue has the common sense to nominate a conservative judge? Please wake up America...Please!
All these conservatives claiming they will not vote Trump in the general election have only one thing going for their threat.... we are not in the general election yet. If Trump is the nominee, I guarantee 99% of these threats will be retracted and they will vote for Trump over Clinton. The other 1% were just crazy from the beginning and may be committed to the State Hospital next week. These threats are similar to those that vowed they would move out of the country if Obama was elected. Guess what? They still live here.
I don't trust Trump. On the other hand, it's a known fact what Clinton would do. So, the dilemma is, the old paradox:
Trust the devil you know or the devil you don't know?
Depending on what comes out of Cleveland, I may have to ponder that fact. My hope is we get the REAL conservative, Cruz.
“There is one singular choice if the makeup of the SCOTUS is concerning and it isn’t Donald Trump.”
And that Choice is Queen Hillary, anyone but TRUMP, NEVER Trump. Idiots. When are you sanctimonious progressives gooing to admit that you are just another collection of eRINOs supporting the Lady in Orange?. Come on you can do it, you are among friends here.
I voted for Cruz in my primary.
Mind the GOP - And Cruz brought us John Roberts...Look it up. During the 2000 recount Ted brought him in, and then lobbied for him when he was up for CJSC...He recently tried to take a mulligan on him, but he damage to healthcare and traditional marriage is done...If those are issues that are important to you (and I say that sincerely - they are not to some)...
I hear you, but where is evidence that should trump be elected, he will listen to good advice on appointing justices? He displays a core ideology of progressive liberal, so I have my doubts. In my humble opinion, if he, hillary, or bernie is elected, the USA is officially over and done.
You are sooo right. And we do know the type of justice Trump would appoint. He already told us, unlike most other candidates. He named Fed. Judge Bill Pryor of Alabama as the type of candidate he would look for. Judge Pryor is a past Attorney General for Alabama as well. Wonderful constitutionalist and federalist judge, pro-life, and true conservative.
By the way, Ted Cruz has lied to us again, this time about "supporting the nominee".
Ted's recent behavior defies who we thought he was. Very disappointed.
Just face it Cruzbots. You Cruz, you lose.
A vote for Trump now is a vote for Hillary later.
This is the most intelligent conversation concerning this topic I have seen on this site yet.
We (freedom, liberty, constitution, conservative values, America) barely survived the last 8 years of Obama. Do you really think we will survive 8 more of Clinton or worse, Sanders? That is what will happen. This is your children’s future America people!
Even @glennbeck should be reading this post and recognizing this threat. It is irreversible! The damage Beck has done thus far is substantive, liken unto what Ron Paul(ites) did to the 2012 election. They own the second term of Obama. Beck and those that refuse to vote will own the Hillary presidency.
This is where the Democrats have us beat. It is crystal clear that the communities within the Democrat Party (Black community, LGBT community, Pro-women community, Hispanic community, ect) all do not agree on everything the party stands for. One thing is sure, they all vote Democrat! Republicans, however, we divide ourselves into smaller factions that refuse to coordinate an effort to defeat the opposition. Divided we fall every time!!! Its petty “I’ll take my ball (vote) and go home” crap.
Listen, I voted Cruz. And I’ll do it again next year if I get the chance. That is the process. Let the rest of America speak, and back the play! I’ll vote Trump if he takes the nomination, no doubt. My children’s future is at stake. You are drinking cool-aid if you convince yourself that Hillary or Sanders will be better than Trump.
I agree with jgrant, WAKE UP America! before it's too late! Trump supporters need to get their collective heads out from their as...es!
Real conservatives no longer exist, just hangers on. I stopped being a conservative when I woke up and realized we elected "supposed conservatives" who immediately betrayed their oaths, promises, us and America for the almighty donor dollar. We have allow the DNC/RNC corporations to tell for whom to vote. I want them to close down their corporations and stop asking for donations to continue the same old, same old establishment. Trump is the only one that is ringing the bell on all the graft, corruption, lying, controlling and eventually turning America into a 3rd world country to be overtake by the NWO/One World Government (remember this is Heidi Cruz's baby and surely Ted must be involved, and all this is pure communism. Trump has increased to 60% the number of voters, he has attracted more latinos, democrats, and blacks, and even the Border Control have voted for him. Vote for America and not establishment Cruz and Kasich who only want to see America fail while lining their pockets! Time to wake up and smell the coffee. You won't like communism, believe me!
Great post I've been wondering myself about that same thing.
Are all of these "Hillary Conservatives" completely out of their minds? Yes we don't know what type of justices Trump would nominate, but we most definitely do know what type Hillary would.
And that should be enough of a calculation in a Trump-Clinton match-up.
Why is it that you think that little hands Trumps choices would be any better then Clinton? Look at his his life, that is where you will see the answer to the questions that matter. Also he has all ready said he thinks his sister would make a good choice. Just go and look a her record. You are welcome to vote for whom ever you choose as am I, and I will NEVER vote Trump. I will vote my conviction and you are welcome to vote yours.
Why all this discussion, when Cruz made it perfectly clear that he holds nothing but 'disdain' for the Supreme Court Anyway?
From the way Cruz talks about the Supreme Court and every other government entity....it sounds as if he would dissolve every bench, branch and office except the Presidential Office.
And I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if that is exactly what he did.......
You have to remember Trump is a liberal. Maybe a little to the right of Hillary, but not much. So you better hope Trump is not the nominee.
 April 6, 2016 at 1:35pm
I wonder if she ever thought about not getting pregnant again…it’s not that hard to NOT DO.
Right?!? If you don't want to get pregnant KEEP YOUR DAMN LEGS CLOSED! This does not take a post graduate degree. This is the dumbest excuse I have ever heard. This woman is out of her mind...
I wonder who she concealed it from. Did her parents know? Did her friends know? Did others know? One's credibility and dependability should be questioned when such acts are performed to cover-up the deed.
April 1, 2016 at 1:39pm
I would really appreciate it if you would read my comment above…people like you who say “I don’t care for Trump and won’t vote for him” might as well be saying “Hillary or Bernie will do, they’ll be better than Trump.” Is that how you feel? Do you really think Cruz can get 85-90% of the remaining delegates? If he doesn’t and there is a contested convention, do you really think the RNC and their cronies are going to really get behind Cruz? You’re dreaming. They will drop him and nominate one of their own, we’ll be out, people will stay home and we will end up with the cronies QUEEN. Purists are going to lose this golden opportunity to retake America. Get off your high horse and support the overthrow of the Clinton coronation.
 April 1, 2016 at 1:16pm
I don’t know about the rest of you, and I’ve been a Cruz supporter for years before he started this run for the presidency, BUT I’m getting sick and tired of all you purists who have decided Clinton is better than Trump…because that is what you are doing when you tear the front-runner down. Keep up the character assignation, the division, and the destruction of any ability to rally the right side of America and we will end up with Hillary Rodham Felon Clinton as Socialist Extraordinaire as leader of the “free” world.
Anybody who thinks Trump would be worse than Hillary needs to have their head examined…and don’t tell me how “they’re the same,” ’cause that’s B.S. and everybody knows it. Is Hillary going to build a wall? Is she going to reform the tax code? Is she going to help our VETERANS? If you guys don’t get your heads out of your a$$es, that’s what is going to happen.
…and don’t think for one second the establishment is going to rally behind Ted Cruz at a contested convention; they’ll drop him like a hot potato. Then where will we be? Ryan? Kasich?
Is Trump going to build a wall, or reform the tax code, or help our veterans? I have my doubts. First, those things are not in the power of the President, except to approve the wall, which has already been funded by Congress. Second, I don’t trust Trump any farther than I can throw him. He’s been a democrat for 50 years and a Republican for 9 months. He doesn’t have a burning ideological desire to see the nation return to its roots; he’s about money and he’s about Trump.
That said, he would still be significantly less damaging to the nation than Clinton.
But there's a candidate who will do whatever he can to accomplish all those things, and more, and he's been a consistent conservative for his whole life. Cruz agrees with all the conservative things Trump says, without the doublespeak and stupidity.
 March 29, 2016 at 3:37pm
@argyle58…I see it a little differently. A vote for Kasich would be the SAME as a vote for Clinton. They are both big government, top-down socialists. I, for the first time in my life, would choose to sit it out. It wouldn’t make a difference one way (Clinton) or the other (Kasich). They both want to continue the status quo and tax me into oblivion while bringing in massive amounts of immigrants to crush my daughter’s already precarious future.
 March 29, 2016 at 12:57pm
I have to respectfully disagree. John Kasich is Hillary Clinton. He thinks his job is to “incentivize” us lowly Americans into running on the government hamster wheel. He thinks we should legalize millions of illegal aliens to further degrade the job market for deserving Americans. I could go on and on.
Frankly, I’m am highly offended by Kasich’s stance on most issues. Who does he think he is…or better yet, who does he think WE are?
I whole heartedly agree with your opinion on Kasich. However, if he does, in fact, by some miracle, manage to get the nomination, he would still be preferable to an avowed Socialist or a closet Marxist.
As stated, we may well be looking at the scenario of choosing the least offensive of two evils. For conservatives to “sit it out” would constitute an egregious act against the nation and will get us 4 more years of existing policies and Socialist goals.
@argyle58...I see it a little differently. A vote for Kasich would be the SAME as a vote for Clinton. They are both big government, top-down socialists. I, for the first time in my life, would choose to sit it out. It wouldn't make a difference one way (Clinton) or the other (Kasich). They both want to continue the status quo and tax me into oblivion while bringing in massive amounts of immigrants to crush my daughter's already precarious future.
 March 28, 2016 at 4:51pm
My problem with this whole situation is Cruz is now coming off as establishment. He is aligning himself with whoever will engage in parlor tricks to deny Trump the nomination…Look at what is happening in Louisiana. It may be quite legitamate (?), but it stinks to high Heaven. It is reminiscent of McDaniels/Barbour in Mississippi.
If Ted gets any closer to the underhanded tactics of the establishment, I’M OUT. I’ve supported him for years, but should he delve any deeper into the establishment game of DENY THE VOTERS WILL, I will support Trump…just saying.
I dropped him when he backed BLM and MoveOn.org over Trump's 1 amendment rights. There's something about him that's just not right. And that half million dollar loan he forgot about gets me too.
1/2 a Canadian married to a wall street gal who was on the board od the North American Union . That is about selling America out .
 March 25, 2016 at 1:07pm
God works in mysterious ways…and anybody who thinks they know who is and isn’t a Christian because of who they decide God has called on them to vote for should be deeply ashamed of themselves. Who is any one of us to decide what GOD does or doesn’t put in someone’s heart? I’ll take God’s dogma over any human dogma any day.