User Profile: ltb


Member Since: September 10, 2010

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 18, 2014 at 6:24pm

    Evolution has nothing to do with the technology that brought us wrist sized computers. Nothing, nada, zip. Darwinists are constantly telling people that if children don’t learn about evolution, America will fall behind in technology. Even during Ken’s debate with Bill Nye, Nye suggested that technology like that used to make mobile phones is due to evolution. That’s a flat out lie. But let’s forget about technology, Darwinists can’t even name one single advance in medicine that can be traced to the belief that men evolved from apelike creatures, and do you know why? Because evolution predicts that information is added at the DNA level through mutations and that never, ever happens. Even vaccines, which Darwinists love taking credit for, have nothing whatsoever to do with evolution. As a matter of fact, we would never have any new vaccines if biologists based their research on the assumption that biological organisms spontaneously mutate into more complex organisms, because mutations never result in the addition of new, original information being added at the DNA level. Advances in vaccines are despite Darwinists, not because of Darwinists. Not only that, but Darwinists actually impeded genome research, because they believed that DNA was filled with useless garbage. Creationists, on the other hand, predicted that so-called junk DNA serves a purpose. Research now shows that Darwinian Scientists were wrong and Creation Scientists were right.

  • April 18, 2014 at 6:17pm

    I watched that debate and there is no question whatsoever that Nye lost. If creation is not a viable model of origins, then it seems like Bill Nye should have tried to prove why evolution is a viable model, since evolution is the only alternative. I debated in high school, in undergraduate school and in graduate school, so I know a little about debating, and if I had been the one debating Ken, I would have laid out precisely why evolution is the only viable model. That’s not what Nye did, though, obviously because he couldn’t. I mean, how exactly could Nye demonstrate that evolution is a viable model of origins when he can’t even answer two fundamental questions, which are “How did matter originate and how did inorganic matter transform into organic matter?”. The reason Darwinists always resort to infantile name calling is because they can’t defend their beliefs and evidently they think that sophomoric insults are a substitute for intelligence. Trust me Bill, they’re not.

    Responses (3) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 10:45am

    “No, I think look at those two americans pursuing happiness and minding their own business if only more of my countrymen could follow suit and stop petitioning the government to get involved in issues that have no direct effect on them we might be able to have a smaller government.”


    Whatever. Those poor, helpless sodomites, they’re so persecuted, they just go about their business and don’t harm anyone. Last I checked, these sodomites are the ones trying to sue Christian business owners into bankruptcy, they’re the ones trying to force churches to bless their unholy unions and they’re the ones demanding people be fired if they dare say they believe marriage should be between a man and a woman. The fact that these sodomites are using the government to force other people to accept their perverse lifestyle is one reason the government is becoming too large to control. People like you are why we can’t have a smaller government.

  • April 17, 2014 at 10:30pm

    “I’ll never be able to work for the U.S. government, probably a lot of the major businesses will not be interested in hiring me. There are definitely a lot of negative effects associated with being a felon…”


    Ten years ago I would have read that and thought, “Duh, Mr. Obvious,” but now I read it and think, “Are you kidding? Being a felon is a prerequisite for working in the Obama Administration or in the financial services industry.” Blaze, if you do a follow up on this story in a couple of years, I’ll bet you’ll find this guy in DC or on Wall Street making six figures.

  • April 17, 2014 at 9:03pm

    Let’s see… about 124 children die from gun accidents each year and about 1,210,000 children are murdered at the hands of abortionists each year. When liberals stop intentionally murdering tiny helpless babies, then I’ll care about what they have to say about accidental gun deaths. Until then, shut up you hypocrites.

  • April 17, 2014 at 7:33pm

    Oh wait, I just thought of something he told the truth about. He was telling the truth when he said he was going to fundamentally transform America. Too bad most people didn’t realize he meant he was going to fundamentally transform America into a communist dystopia.

  • April 17, 2014 at 7:04pm

    30,000 people die every year because of gun violence? BIG DEAL, 30,000 INNOCENT BABIES DIE EVERY TEN DAYS BECAUSE OF ABORTION YOU HYPOCRITES!

    Responses (3) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 6:59pm

    Can someone tell me just one thing that Obama has said that was the truth?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 6:55pm

    JamesCrow, I’m just making fun of a few people who give the liberals a chance to point at duck dynasty and say “see! That’s what all those crazy republicans think”


    I never in my life thought America would go so far down into the sewer that sodomites would be emboldened enough to flaunt their perversion in public and mock people who understand basic biology. Do you really think I care if liberals point at me and say “See! That’s another crazy Republican who doesn’t think two men should an*ly sodomize each other and ask a church to bless their unholy union”? The opinions of these people is just a little less important to me than Charles Manson’s philosophical musings on the Beatle’s White Album.

  • April 17, 2014 at 9:53am

    Yippeee! America is one step closer to becoming exactly like Sodom and Ghomorrah.


    “But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people. (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

    “In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.” (2 Timothy 3:12)

    Responses (12) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 8:09pm

    Oh no, a Christian athlete who was raised in a home where the Bible was venerated believes in Creation…. the humanity!

  • April 16, 2014 at 8:06pm

    When Ted Cruz becomes president in 2016.

  • April 15, 2014 at 10:29pm

    THERAPTURCOMES, I agree that it is a pre trib rapture and have no doubts either. BTW, I wasn’t trying to trap you with those questions, they are questions I’ve asked myself and I just wanted to know your thoughts.

  • April 15, 2014 at 9:50pm

    jells12, during the early years of American history, Christianity wasn’t “pushed” upon its citizenry, because ~99% of the population were self-professing Christians. Furthermore, if America had not been founded on Christian ideals, you wouldn’t enjoy the freedoms you enjoy today. As a matter of fact, the reason you are less free today than the people who founded America is because our nation has drifted so far away from its Christian moorings. If you want to know what America would look like if atheists had founded it, study the history of the Soviet Union. If you want to know what America will look like when atheists finish transforming it, study the history of the Soviet Union.

  • April 15, 2014 at 9:37pm

    And let me once again repeat this little gem:

    In 1899, the Supreme Court (Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States) concluded that America “is a Christian Nation” and supported its decision with 87 precedents, quotes from the Founding Fathers and excerpts from Congressional Acts. In 1947, however, when a very liberal Supreme Court decided that there is a “wall of separation” between Church and State, it did not cite one single precedent and only referenced one quote from Thomas Jefferson that was taken completely out of context.

    I will correct the ignorance of these atheists every time it rears its ugly head.

  • April 15, 2014 at 9:33pm

    For all of my atheist friends, who are ignorant about the First Amendment, let’s see what Joseph Storey [Supreme Court Justice who was appointed by James Madison (aka, the architect of the Constitution) and the man who started Harvard Law School] had to say about the matter…

    “The real object of the [First] amendment was, not to countenance, much less to advance Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment, which should give to an hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government” — Commentary by Joseph Storey.

    TRANSLATION: The First Amendment was not about tolerating non-Christian faiths and it certainly wasn’t about denying Christianity’s importance in our Republic, the intent of the First Amendment was to prevent favoritism being shown to one denomination of Christianity over other Christian denominations through the establishment of a federal church. In other words, our founding fathers didn’t want a Church of America, akin to the Church of England, dictating what doctrines Christians should follow in the United States (e.g., full immersion baptism, pre-determination, etc.).

  • April 15, 2014 at 9:22pm


  • April 15, 2014 at 9:18pm

    THERAPTURCOMES, one other question… if post-trib Christians are right and we’re still around when the anti-Christ is revealed, will you comply with his law that all people must “receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads” in order to buy or sell (Revelation 13:16-17), knowing that you will be damned to Hell for eternity if you do comply?

  • April 15, 2014 at 9:07pm

    THERAPTURCOMES, Do you think that Daniel should have obeyed the decree of King Nebuchadnezzar “that everyone… shall fall down and worship the gold image” (Daniel 3:10)? If you were a German during WWII and had been assigned to Auschwitz, would you have dropped Zyklon B pellets into the gas chambers if that was part of you job?

  • April 15, 2014 at 8:48pm

    Who is calling for insurrection and revolution? All these people at the Bundy ranch did was stand their ground and that’s what every American should do against this tyrannical government. If anyone is calling for the violent overthrow of the federal government, then I don’t want to have anything to do with them either. Taking up arms and refusing to be bullied by federal bureaucrats is not insurrection.

123 To page: Go