User Profile: tzion


Member Since: October 05, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [1] February 6, 2016 at 8:31pm

    So you actually think Cruz and Clinton agree on Israel and Iran? Clinton supports the Iran agreement and wants to force Israel to agree to a Palestinian state. Cruz opposes the Iran deal and had no intention of forcing Israel to do anything.
    Seriously, in what way are they similar?

  • [19] February 4, 2016 at 2:18pm

    If the Palestinians had laid down their arms, there would already be a Palestine. They were offered a state, Israel was even in the process of making land transfers. But rather than claim victory, the Palestinians merely increased their terrorist actions.

    They have no one to blame but themselves and their leaders.

  • [1] February 4, 2016 at 2:13pm

    Moreover, even the article admits that they didn’t do it to even a fraction of the degree nor did they purposefully have information stripped of its classification. It’s like the man man whose stone drunk pointing fingers at the man who used alcoholic mouthwash.

  • February 2, 2016 at 11:35pm

    Under the current system where only men have to enroll in selective service, I have no doubt that many men would be deemed unfit for military service and dismissed. So long as the standards aren’t lowered, I don’t see how adding women would hurt. Sure fewer of them might meet the standards by comparison, but those that do would be a vital addition.

    Besides, other countries have successfully demonstrated the drafting women can work. Just look at Israel. As for your concern about a woman pulling you off the battlefield, generally women and men are deployed separately, so most of the time a woman has to carry someone whose wounded, it’s another woman.

  • February 2, 2016 at 1:59pm

    What if the rapist was married with a kid. Now his wife had to raise the child of a rapist. Oh the horror.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 2, 2016 at 11:22am

    You completely missed the point. Each single coin flip has two outcomes. Because each coin flip is a separate event, the number of overall outcomes for all the coin flips is 2^6, which is 64.

    It doesn’t matter that different coins were used in different locations. Why? Because even if it was only one coin, the result of the first flip would have no influence on the second. The odds are the same.

  • [2] February 2, 2016 at 8:32am

    O’Malley last I saw was at <1%, meaning he’s not even high enough to reach 1%. Clinton and Sanders’s numbers were likely rounded to the nearest whole percent. O’Malley would round down to 0%, meaning he got less votes than almost every Republican despite being in a smaller field.

  • [9] February 2, 2016 at 8:25am

    Your point is irrelevant. Let me explain it this way. If you do 6 coin flips there are 64 possible outcomes. Only 1 of those 64 would be all heads. Same for all tails. In comparison, there are 6 outcomes that would tally 5 heads and 15 that would tally at 4 heads.

    That’s not to say the 6 heads is impossible, just unlikely.

    A more relevant argument would be that the article explicitly says that there may have been additional coin tosses we don’t know about. The chances of Clinton winning 6 tosses goes up dramatically if there were more than 6 performed.

    Responses (5) +
  • [6] February 1, 2016 at 11:56am

    The moral of the story: Hamas is allowed to kill Palestinians so long as they say they’re martyrs. Israel is not allowed to kill Palestinians because Hamas says they’re martyrs.

  • [19] February 1, 2016 at 11:26am

    Maybe we’ll see a movie sequel to American Sniper.

  • [4] January 31, 2016 at 12:42pm

    What is a “factual question”? Would it be a question that questions the facts (which yours questions usually are) or questions that seek to explore the facts (which yours never are)?

    Half of the questions you ask are about as “factual” as me asking “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?”

  • January 31, 2016 at 12:39pm

    What exactly is international law? Is there an international government that passes laws? The answer is no. International law, at best, is simply a widely agreed upon concept. Besides, which law is Israel supposed to have violated?

    If looking at a map is all you need to understand history, than the US should immediately cede California, New Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona to Mexico.

  • [3] January 31, 2016 at 12:33pm

    What is the recent kill ratio the **** have been enjoying over the Arabs?

    Why would that be relevant?

  • [20] January 29, 2016 at 1:09pm

    Since when has lesbian been a gender or a sex? Besides, I’m sure if you went back to their origins, there was no difference between sex and gender.

  • [10] January 29, 2016 at 1:07pm

    You get to be the first person in history to be both gay and lesbian at the same time.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] January 28, 2016 at 3:02pm

    So in short, he’s smart enough to do stupid things without getting hurt.

  • January 27, 2016 at 9:04pm

    So that’s a no right? The question asked of there was anything about THIS SPECIFIC CASE that raised suspicion.

  • January 27, 2016 at 7:44pm

    Not trusting and assuming everything is a lie are two very different things. The first means you haven’t formed an opinion and are waiting for more information. The latter means you’ve already decided the information is false even without evidence.

  • [1] January 27, 2016 at 4:58pm

    So you admit to opposing the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Thanks for being honest.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] January 26, 2016 at 4:38pm

    Most of the cases in Israel regarding this share one thing in common: the “owners” could provide no documentation that they were legal residents. In Europe that wasn’t the case.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love