That’s the best you can come up with? A meme is now proof? Talk about losing arguments.
March 4, 2015 at 1:11pm
“I don’t mean any disrespect but I think your kind of naïve to think that the three buildings came down in their own footprint and practically all dust was left as the remains.”
The towers spread a debris field over 8 times the area of their footprints. Core columns struck buildings half a block away. And the remains were all dust? Please. They were cleaning up twisted pieces of steel for months.
March 4, 2015 at 1:09pm
“When a semi-truck collides at a high rate of speed and hit’s an overpass cement wall directly, the wall stays intact and the truck breaks apart.”
How fast is “high rate of speed”? 60 MPH? Imagine if the truck was travelling at 600 MPH. Would the cement wall remain intact? No. Would the truck? No. Both would be destroyed.
“Second point, jet fuel is like kerosene and it doesn’t burn for a long time like the buildings were.”
Then it stands to reason that some other fuel source fed the flames. Which is exactly what every report stated. The NIST report clearly stated that the fuel burned up within minutes if not seconds from the impact.
“Building 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane and came down in free fall, as well as the two towers came down in free fall. There are scientist all over the world who have debunked the claim that these buildings came down because of a fire or plane crash.”
First, the towers did not collapse at free fall. If you watch the collapse videos, you can clearly see that pieces of debris fall away from the tower and, traveling at free fall, overtake the collapse itself, meaning the towers were collapsing at a rate slower than free fall.
Second, building 7 wasn’t the only other building to collapse. Buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6 did too.
Third, building 7 started collapsing on the inside several seconds before the walls did. The overall collapse time is far longer than what a free fall collapse would be.
In short, you need to check you facts again.
March 4, 2015 at 1:00pm
“They found Thermite in the dust and if you think about it, when a plane collides with a building, you would expect some breaking apart of the plane, not the plane just melts into the building.”
Do you know what Thermite is? It’s Iron Oxide (also known as rust) and Aluminum. That’s it. Both are compounds that are readily available within the tower for all sorts of things. Now, had there been a Thermite reaction, we’d expect to see the products of Thermite, not the reactants. The products are Iron, which is present anyways, and Aluminum Oxide, which was not found in significant quantities, thereby disproving the thermite theory.
As for the planes, they didn’t “melt into the building”. They struck the building, destroyed the outer walls, and sprayed the interior with debris. The planes DID break up upon impact. That’s the whole point.
March 4, 2015 at 12:26pm
Iran has murdered hundreds of Americans, was behind multiple attacks on American Embassies, and calls for the destruction of America. They even practice blowing up replicas of American aircraft carriers. That’s NOT our concern.
 March 4, 2015 at 12:10pm
If Jews received text messages, why were there Jews among the deceased?
March 4, 2015 at 12:03pm
Can you do ANY research for yourself? The answers literally 30 seconds to find with an internet connection.
What were they doing in Beirut? US forces were part of a multinational peacekeeping force that operated from 1982 to 1984 overseeing the withdrawal of the PLO terrorist group. Lebanon asked for the troops assistance.
“Is Hamas a terrorist group? Because they were funded by Israel.”
Yes they are a terrorist group. No they were never funded by Israel. They were funded by Iran though and still are.
As for “Iran did not bomb any barracks”, again, in 1983 a marine barracks was bombed by terrorists. The group responsible called itself the Islamic Jihad Organization, an offshoot of Hezbollah. The members of this group were funded by Iran. The members of this group were trained by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards under the direction of Ayatollah Khomeini, the ruler of Iran.
So they were trained by Iran, funded by Iran, all with the consent of Iran’s ruler. Conclusion, Iran organized the attack on the US Marine Barracks resulting in the death of 241 Americans. And that’s just one event. I could cite the US Embassy Bombing of the same year, carried out by the same group, which killed an additional 63 people, 17 of whom were American. Also linked to Iran is the 1984 bombing of the Beirut Embassy Annex. What more proof do you need.
I have cited 3 attacks by Iran against the US, not counting the attack on our embassy in Iran. What can you give?
 March 4, 2015 at 10:01am
As I pointed out yesterday, Iran has murdered hundreds of Americans in ONE attack. The 1983 bombing of the Marine Barracks in Beirut killed 241 Americans, most of them servicemen. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that it was the deadliest terrorist attack against America outside of 9/11 itself.
And who carried out that attack? Hezbollah, a terrorist group that is funded by Iran, whose members were trained by Iran’s revolutionary guard, and whose actions are therefore directly tied to Iran.
Conclusion, Iran has not only attacked us (and on more than that one occasion), but is responsible for one of the most deadly attacks against America.
For Israel, in contrast, the best you can do is provide a single event which even the US government says was an accident.
 March 3, 2015 at 6:54pm
And what the antisemites hate most about this speech: he never once called for the US to attack Iran. In fact, he clearly stated that the alternative to the bad deal isn’t war.
And you believed his lie? LOL!! TBGRs are so naive; let's make sure you are in the front line to catch Iran's bullets first!
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4631634,00.html Why did Netanyahu forgo the military option, we asked.
"All the professional bodies were opposed to it," Dagan (Ex Head of Mossad) said. "Netanyahu would have had to take full responsibility for such a decision. He didn't want to take that responsibility."
"We were opposed to the military option, but it never occurred to us to rebel against him. None of us doubted that the prime minister had the authority to take such a decision. We voiced our professional opinions, and that's it. He didn't want to take such a dramatic decision without the backing of the heads of the defense establishment because he knew he would bear the responsibility in the end. I have never seen him take responsibility for anything.
"I've seen other leaders make decision and admit subsequently that they were wrong. No one is immune from making mistakes. The difference between him and others lies in the willingness to take responsibility. He's great when it comes to words, but not so when it comes to taking action.
Oh, he didn't discuss Iran? Here is the transcript: http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/netanyahuspeechUN.jpg
March 3, 2015 at 5:05pm
You didn’t listen to the speech. If you had, you’d know that Netanyahu specifically advised a course that would prevent war. He didn’t all the US to fight Iran. He said that waiting for a good deal instead of taking a bad one would avert a war.
In contrast, he implied that a bad deal would lead to Israel attacking Iran, with it without the USA.
March 3, 2015 at 4:01pm
False. According to the polls, this may have hurt his reelection.
 March 3, 2015 at 3:58pm
Netanyahu wants to prevent another north Korea. That’s why he wants to prevent a bad deal. A bad deal means that by the time we hear that Iran’s broken the deal it’ll be too late to stop them. A good deal means that Iran won’t have the means to create nukes.
 March 3, 2015 at 3:51pm
Of course it’s nothing new. He’s been saying the same thing the whole time and you won’t listen.
“They should stand on their own without our help militarily or economically.”
Your behind the times aren’t you? Israel receives exactly $0 of economic aid from the US.
 March 3, 2015 at 12:37pm
Well THEORETICALLY, Obama cannot lift the sanctions without Congress’s approval. Whether that will stop him not even I can say.
 March 3, 2015 at 10:33am
“When do we get to hear Iran’s side?”
Which part? The part about them attacking our embassy, the part about them sponsoring terrorist attacks against our military, or the part about them murdering Americans?
 March 3, 2015 at 10:32am
And Iran FUNDS Hezbollah (and Hamas to a lesser degree). Hezbollah is a group so powerful, they control about 70% of Lebanon. They also have the backing of Syria, Iran’s ally. Hezbollah is today more powerful and dangerous than Al Qaeda.