Get TheBlaze

User Profile: GiveUsJustice

GiveUsJustice

Member Since: March 23, 2011

Comments

123
  • March 15, 2013 at 12:47pm

    ” The salesperson is then supposed to be the person driving off the lot.and later change seats.”

    So basically what you are saying is, that you are incredibly lucky none of “your” cars never got stole? Your method seems to be the worst I’ve ever heard of. Let the salesman get out of the car to switch? That would be a crooks dream.

    And as for a license, try actually using your brain outside the box and realize millions of illegals are here with “licenses” that are actually voting. What are you going to do? Track him down? Hahaha.

    I’m glad our dealers where I live are NOTHING like you. I bet your employees gave you gifts often from your upbeat sense of humor and stellar personality.

  • February 25, 2013 at 11:01am

    I just got through reading a book. It was created by a person. The things that happened in it didn’t happen in real life.

    You just made zero sense with your statement other than to show you don’t like watching TV. Reading a book doesn’t grant you access to elevate your status above someone on any level, even intellectually.

  • January 23, 2013 at 10:49am

    @SendTheMeteors posted:

    “The unmentioned fact was that the restaurant falsely claimed and advertised that that their nuggets and chicken sandwiches complied with Muslim dietary laws. Nobody demanded that, that’s what McDonald’s claimed and advertised. Why? Good old capitalism! There were a lot of Muslims in the area (as there are in the world), and McDonald’s wanted to sell them food. Good for them on that, but when you falsely advertises and make claims that aren’t true, then you are violating US law.

    Now why do you suppose that little bit of information was left unsaid here? I don’t know, go figure! Must have been an accident. Oh well, I guess they settled up.”

    Ummm…. Okkkkk??? Here is the article one more time….. since you forgot to read it instead of just the title. Trolls will be trolls, others will suck at it like you.

    “McDonald’s has agreed to pay $700,000 to the members of a Detroit-area Muslim community because one of its franchises advertised Sharia-compliant food but then allegedly sold food that wasn’t prepared in the manner dictated by Islamic dietary law, TheBlaze’s Billy Hallowell reported this morning.

    “The lawsuit alleged that [Dearborn Heights resident Ahmed Ahmed] bought a chicken sandwich in September 2011 at a Dearborn McDonald’s but found it wasn’t halal — meaning it didn’t meet Islamic requirements for preparing food.”

  • December 27, 2012 at 2:08pm

    So nothing tells you when you are suppose to eat them, or how much.

    This was a waste of time to publish.

  • December 27, 2012 at 2:05pm

    followed by analyst telling us how bad he is even though he doesn’t play

  • December 3, 2012 at 11:58am

    You’ve got a point. Looks like the Christians there will need to just get more people involved and then it can last longer. If I lived there, it would be no problems to come out for a couple hours each week. Surely they have enough people to fill the week for a month. Easy solution. Thanks for the comment.

  • November 27, 2012 at 1:40pm

    These people actually took some skits from scare tactics. Watch some of the others, like poltergeist.

    Also, this little girl could have looked soooo much better. Dye her hair black and make it wet and drooping in front of her face. Holy crap that would have been amazing. The only scare factor in this is that she just appears, she didn’t look scary at all. If she would have looked like the chick from The Ring, I would have literally been trying to beat those windows in.

  • November 27, 2012 at 10:46am

    They are to busy spitting out what policy should be placed to protect young children from potential harm in pranks. Look for an ad near you to vote them into office soon.

  • November 19, 2012 at 2:29pm

    “And you should be ashamed for the evilness in your heart to condemn him so quickly for simply not being a believer in Christ.”

    So you know the whole story? You know for a fact he was not lieing? I doubt it. The fact that he puts Atheist behind his name now makes it a story and is going to get plenty of backing. If he would have put “christian” behind it, he would have been shunned. Don’t get quick with your own judgement when you have no clue what the real facts are. It is all “probably” right now for both sides.

  • November 5, 2012 at 2:29pm

    In one of his rants, ILIKEPEOPLE has a point. If you are wanting to energize your base, you don’t do it by saying Obama is going to win in a landslide. That would make me not vote. By saying Romney is screwed would make me want to fight the lines.

    I can understand how a less intelligent mind would think otherwise though and keep putting out that Obama is going to landslide this thing.

    Could you argue that the person is just trying to do it for their own glory to gloat afterwards? Yes. But why would you want to do that? Liberals never do that and 80 to 90% of the time spit lies to the American public through the main stream all the time, why change now.

  • October 12, 2012 at 10:16am

    “It isn’t free, you just don’t see the costs, including the costs you pay for your service to access the internet, let alone the costs that are passed onto you from the companies with which you do business.”

    I guess you are suggesting someone get rid of internet to start sending mail instead? That’s backward’s technology. As long as you have internet and are not replacing it, then yes, email is free. You suggest adding to your cost by using the USPS because you have to pay for internet. You aren’t thinking that through at all.

    “E-mail is great for chain letters or quick notes, but when I want to communicate with friends and family, I call.”

    Skype is free, and it is video calling as well. Everyone that has a cell phone no longer needs a house phone. We got rid of ours and now save $40 a month.

    “When I need to get an object to another state or across town, there isn’t anyone cheaper or faster than the USPS and they almost always get it right.”

    Are we talking about objects that just require stamps? That’s what the argument is over, and I think we’ve cleared up that there is multiple options cheaper than the USPS for getting what you need that requires stamps to someone else without incurring fees at all.

    They want all their workers to make 2x more than people working just as “hard” as them in the private sector. Quit crying about not getting enough help from the government.

  • October 5, 2012 at 11:19am

    “leh
    Posted on October 5, 2012 at 9:16am

    If they were not so bias and political, I would agree with the education part. It is not the children they are now trying to educate but pushing the liberal garbage using tax payers money.”

    This

  • October 2, 2012 at 9:28am

    So how does society reproduce. Simple question. If being gay is natural. Do you defy your “natural order” you think is correct and use the opposite sex?

    Responses (1) +
  • October 2, 2012 at 9:20am

    “It is time for the Obama campaign to retire this talking point, no matter how much it seems to resonate with voters.”

    Why? Unless I watch fox news, go to the drudge, or come here, I wouldn’t be getting anything from Mitt Romney. I watch a lot of football (NFL and College) and the only ads I have seen so far is from Obama. I haven’t seen a Mitt Romney ad on TV yet. If all you see is Obama ads, why would he stop putting them out, since no one but some web sites is calling him out on it.

    They know what they are doing, and it is obviously working. Who the hell goes to the Washington Post everyday.

  • August 2, 2012 at 11:03am

    Wait, so corp puts out a tweet saying they serve everyone? Can anyone show proof where CFA said they wouldn’t? One statement, one news report? I mean if they are turning people away, SOMEONE would have proof right?

    There should be backlash against that tweet telling corp of Wendy’s they have no clue what they are talking about and to quit listening to rumors about the story and read up.

    CFA SERVES EVERYONE AS WELL MORONS.

  • July 23, 2012 at 10:47am

    So let me get this straight.

    Libs think we should legalize marijuana because it takes to much to try to control it. So lets just make it legal.

    But for guns, they think we should start a big push on trying to regulate it, even though everyone here knows it won’t stop someone like this from getting a gun and doing what he did if he wanted to, but it will now make a huge dent in the pocket books of society to try to regulate guns.

    Someone could take a big truck, hit the interstate and ram head on to oncoming tracking and possibly kill 12 people. Will we make a push that all cars should be banned from society? You can’t stop people from getting weed, guns, or cars or anything that can be used in a dangerous way. You just can’t. So lets take it away from everyone period, and let all the ones that truly have evil intent still be able to acquire this stuff.

    I’m waiting for someone to bring this double standard up.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 23, 2012 at 10:35am

    “TeslanEdison
    Posted on July 23, 2012 at 9:19am

    Truthfully the movie should have had an R rating, but Hollywood scammed another PG-13″

    Explain.

  • July 23, 2012 at 10:32am

    Have you watched the movie? Any child that loves batman would be able to watch this movie. The rating could ONLY have been from fighting scenes. There is nothing gruesome at all in this movie, and as always, there is no profanity like normal hollywood trash standards, there is no nudity or wild sex scenes. I mean, they show a scene where a dude is dead that just got shot up, and he has NO blood or bullet wounds at all. In today’s standards of what PG-13 is, this movie should have been PG.

    To recap, any 6 year old that loves batman can watch this movie. I would have taken my 7 year old nephew (that loves comics) to this movie with no problem.

  • July 17, 2012 at 10:44am

    And how do you evolve when you can’t reproduce? Is the man going to have a baby? Is the woman going to fertilize her partner?

    We both know that’s not going to happen. For that to happen, you will NEED the other sex, and by doing that, you admit to not only yourself, but to others that you can’t evolve anything.

    But to go even further, you are one that is promoting yourself and your lifestyle on here and pushing it forward. This could only mean that you believe man and man and woman and woman should be the end game for everyone by calling everyone else “obsolete”. Lets see how obsolete you are by never accept a man’s sperm to reproduce and never accepting that a woman has to have your child for you and your partner.

    Wow. “Smarter”???

  • July 13, 2012 at 9:57am

    Plus 1

123