223.535 million whites with 9.9% poverty rate = over 22 million whites living below the poverty level.
38.929 million blacks with 28.4% poverty rate = a little over 11 million blacks living below the poverty level.
There are more than double the number of whites living below the poverty level than there are whites. Blacks commit 85% of the violent crimes and tend to be much more violent. If poverty was the reason, whites would have double the violent crime rate of blacks, but that’s not the case.
The following stats are cut and pasted from metapedia.org
-Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder
-When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife
-Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a White than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery
-Based on “Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008″ there were 19,293 Black-on-White rapes/sexual assaults and no White-on-Black rapes
***-The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black and Hispanic
There’s plenty more, but this is more than sufficient.
 November 24, 2015 at 2:12pm
At least two years of trolling and Modrep hasn’t learned the simplest thing. The liberal answer is to throw money at it as it gets worse and worse. Detroit received about many times more money per student than schools in Republican districts that are doing many times better. Bring competition and choice to schools and you’ll see cost go down and results skyrocket. Throwing money at them has done little to nothing for decades. In many cases, the schools’ results have only gotten worse.
Choice and competition is the answer, not wasting more money on terrible teachers.
 November 23, 2015 at 8:15am
Do you celebrate pasta with a colander on your head, pencil?
Do Christians also need to do that to make you happy?
 November 23, 2015 at 7:49am
It couldn’t be because they just let an army of Muslims across their borders?
 November 23, 2015 at 7:44am
She probably writes love letters to Charles Manson.
 November 21, 2015 at 11:49pm
Let’s play WHO SAID THIS QUOTE?!
Hitler or Hillary?
1) We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.
2) Society’s needs come before the individual’s needs.
My answer is “What difference does it make?”
… but #1 is Hillary and #2 is Hitler
Actually, there is a difference. Hillary’s quote is even worse than Hitler’s. At least Hitler acknowledged individuals have needs. Hillary does not – only her own.
 November 21, 2015 at 1:56pm
Well, we have far fewer people getting married now too. Even when the young ones marry, they are getting divorced at a ridiculously high rate. I think married couples would need 5 kids or more just to push the US’s birthrate back to 2.1. Who can afford to have that many kids these days? Not many that I know. My parents could barely afford four kids and the four of us combined had only three kids and none of all seven are married. My parents were married for over 50 years. My brothers had very brief marriages and their wives have married several times – all brief marriages – the youngest ex-wife was married six times before she turned 40 – she’s working on a seventh marriage now and she only had two kids. The two oldest never married nor had kids. That seems to be “the new way.” Marriage seems to mean nothing to today’s women. It’s just a passing fancy – not to be taken seriously.
I live in a VERY liberal city. ultracrazylib… I’ve heard dozens of women say that they enjoy having kids without having husbands. Not merely matter-of-factly speaking, but they are very boastful about being single moms and even laugh about cheating on their husbands. It’s only the over-50 women in my workplace who actually took their marriages seriously – and a very VERY tiny minority of young women.
Maybe it’s better in other places, but here in lib-town, marriage seems to be just a way to collect alimony.
Reference - "all brief marriages – the youngest ex-wife was married six times before she turned 40"
I found after decades of observation. That the majority of women are willing to give up their Freedom & Liberty for Security and support. Hence why many push the Gv for more programs. Which may offer support, takes their freedoms in exchange. Plus as time goes on, many of the women expect to be entertained. And they have increased independence due to social programs and incomes. While trying to feminize boys and males. They still have a split personality. They expect independence while still expecting the males to pay. Or friend mode. While is nothing more than on call support for something when needed.
The issues are much more deeper than the article is addressing. - Such as. If the Gv or society makes the religious beliefs more PC. Then the truth is. You no longer actually have the religion. You have a government or the Kings religion.
So what difference does it make?
A good point would be. If you back into time. To the 1930s. And new the basics of the future and Hitler. Would you have children? - That is where we are today. The writing is on the wall and evident.
 November 21, 2015 at 1:16pm
That woman is dumber than a box of rocks.
 November 21, 2015 at 12:52pm
Bingo, Loveyouall, I was going to say the same.
Monk said, “Whoever put that together is really really stupid.”
Nah… “The DNC voters are REALLY REALLY stupid.”
[-2] November 20, 2015 at 11:31pm
You need to Think Once before you Think Twice.
What a load of BS.
“…for many religions when it comes to sexuality (like Christianity), consent is never considered”
You must have completely lost your mind.
Deuteronomy 22: But if in the open country a man meets a young woman who is betrothed, and the man seizes her and lies with her, then only the man who lay with her shall die. But you shall do nothing to the young woman; she has committed no offense punishable by death. For this case is like that of a man attacking and murdering his neighbor, because he met her in the open country, and though the betrothed young woman cried for help there was no one to rescue her.
Not only does The Bible condemn rape and consider consent. It suggests the death penalty as an appropriate punishment for rape.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
November 20, 2015 at 5:26pm
Funny thing is I moved from the east coast to find work after Carter ruined the economy. It was a very conservative town.
Now I’m in the middle of “The fly-over states” and they’re Ultracrazylib here.
Drugs and homelessness
Racially obsessed teens with pierced faces and blue or green hair
Ugly feminists want to go topless
Global warming nuts
Single moms sleeping around… we got it all right here
 November 20, 2015 at 4:57pm
Liberalism is a mental illness.
 November 20, 2015 at 4:55pm
The winters seem much colder than when I moved here 30 years ago.
I went rock climbing in a T-shirt on Christmas day 30 years ago, I drove all the way across Colorado in a T-shirt with my window open in the middle of January about 20-something years ago, and now it’s near freezing in the middle of October.
I’m not buying it.
Besides, in the mid to late 70′s, they were telling us we were all going to freeze to death.
Remember Spock narrating “In Search of… Global Cooling”? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kGB5MMIAVA
 November 20, 2015 at 4:45pm
I thought the racism garbage was done in the 60′s. Except from my liberal teachers in college (who I just thought were loonies), I’ve heard almost nothing about race from normal people from the mid 70′s until Obama’s election.
 November 20, 2015 at 4:32pm
I think they record race more often for the Democrats as a political tool. They like to use statistics to say one race is oppressed or being targeted by police more often than whites and Asians.
Like how they record race and gender on job applications. The majority of employers don’t care about the race and gender, it’s only recorded to make Democrats happy.
 November 20, 2015 at 3:51pm
Looks more like propaganda to me. They said, “Family doesn’t complete you, it destroys you.” They turned the machine on, so that wasn’t a plot twist.
It’s exactly how it appears: Liberal anti-family and anti-life and anti-Christian propaganda.
 November 20, 2015 at 3:44pm
I won’t watch the show either.
I watched the clip though.
The writer is absolutely disgusting.
 November 20, 2015 at 3:37pm
I’ve also heard Democrats say, many times, “Terrorism isn’t a serious problem. Not that many people are killed by terrorism.”
But in the next breath they say, “Even if gun control saves one life, it’s worth it.”
!!!! Hypocritical much, liberals?
 November 20, 2015 at 3:26pm
I was working at 16 too, but I think the issue here is just rounding.
The actual number is something like 94,563,239… or whatever. No one is going to use that number. They just round it off to 100 million or one out of three working age citizens are not working. The number is much higher than what is acceptable.
I’ve been saying 100 million for quite some time and I’m not even a Trump guy so I’m not defending him by any stretch of the imagination. I’m all in for Cruz.