To be fair, it was probably another Rambo wannabe militiaman carrying around his AR15 who accidentally discharged his rifle while clearing the chamber….like what happened in front of the Ohio recruiting station today.
Was described as firing a handgun indiscriminately.
 July 18, 2015 at 6:21pm
So much for the “love one another” commercial that was posted here last night by The Blaze because all I see in these threads is hatred. Hate for Muslims, hate for anything science-related, hate for gays, even hate for the new discoveries about Pluto. I mean it goes on and on consistently. And all posted by people who claim to live a higher moral law.
Yeah, I do hate ignorant sheepie's who fall..... hook, line and sinker for the liberal media spin. Try using some of those God given critical thinking skills. You may then connect the dots. The Koran is clear on killing or enslaving all infidels That includes you v15.
So v15, who died and left you expert on what is 'hate' and 'love' and just plain 'concern' and common sense & discernment? Be ever weary of wolves in sheep's clothing.
‘If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge, I will repay,” says the Lord. On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him, if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.’
Perhaps you (v15) should read the whole Bible, not just pull one or two partial (decimated) verses to fit your narrative (agenda).
seems to me that you are overly sensitive and blind to the truth.
Like the ole saying goes....Truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth.
 July 18, 2015 at 5:59pm
So much for the “love one another” commercial posted last night. I see no love on these anti-Muslim, anti-science, anti-gay hate threads on The Blaze. Believe you have a god on your side and have a higher moral path? Then please act like it.
Ever spent any time in the Middle-East, v15 ?
If we don't wake up damned soon to what's happening, it isn't going to be pretty.
This site list the attacks ON AMERICANS starting on 4/14/1972
till 7/16/2015 There are 73 if I counted right.
I'm an agnostic! STHU!
If these people are so peaceful, why do they still follow a murdering barbarian cutthroat POS child rapist as their "prophet?"
Muslim follow a pedophile as there GOD!!!!!!
That's all you need to know. It's basic good vs evil. And a pedophile is Evil.
I love them as people, but they must be exterminated for their crimes.
Anti fake liberal science maybe but we believe in the science that shows that the earth ain't that old, that evolution don't happen, and that global warming doesn't happen, and that the liberals are wrong. That is the majority of evidence btw.
Compare us to the nazis
Can you name the color of armband that homosexuals wore in the death camps?
I didn't think so.
'If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: "It is mine to avenge, I will repay," says the Lord. On the contrary: "If your enemy is hungry, feed him, if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head." Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.'
Perhaps you (v15) should read the whole Bible, not just pull one or two partial (decimated) verses to fit your narrative (agenda).
July 18, 2015 at 1:59am
Now put it in rainbow font and watch the right’s heads explode.
I was just pointing out knowboyknows’ logic to him. Me, I’m generally against abortion and capital punishment. I’m against the state taking away someone’s life. Statistics bear that the death penalty doesn’t prevent people from committing murder. A good example of this would be China, where there are 60+ crimes that warrant the death penalty yet the murder rate continues to be rampant there. And here in the U.S. it costs more to keep an inmate on death row than life in prison. If you’re going to say “we believe all life is precious,” then at least keep your belief consistent.
 July 10, 2015 at 4:51pm
Norman Bridwell said that Clifford was a big red dog. Your point?
Here’s something to consider:
“Religion is man-made. Even the men who made it cannot agree on what their prophets or redeemers or gurus actually said or did.” – CH
I fail to see the correlation between a person that has committed a henious act, has been found guilty, and has exhausted every avenue of appeal before being put to death, and that of a baby whose only crime was attempting to be born. Could you point it out for me?
Is there a right to the death penalty? Even the right to seek out an abortion differs from the right to have one. In the former no one is obligated to assist. Don't worry, those who think for you don't get it either.
I was just pointing out knowboyknows' logic to him. Me, I'm generally against abortion and capital punishment. I'm against the state taking away someone's life. Statistics bear that the death penalty doesn't prevent people from committing murder. A good example of this would be China, where there are 60+ crimes that warrant the death penalty yet the murder rate continues to be rampant there. And here in the U.S. it costs more to keep an inmate on death row than life in prison. If you're going to say "we believe all life is precious," then at least keep your belief consistent.
Yes, there is a right to the death penalty. The right for society at large to purge themselves of chronic, violent criminals has long been established.
It costs more to keep someone in death row than life in prison because of the very fact that we believe that all life is precious, and deathrow inmates should have access to every possible action to prove their innocence.
However, if the guilty charge remains true, there are some heinous acts that deserve no less than death. That is how life is.
This, however, does not equate to your argument against pro-life, as every unborn child has yet to commit a crime that warrants death. Your comparison still falls short.
[-9] July 10, 2015 at 1:59pm
The South leads the nation by having the least advanced degrees per capita, lowest SAT & ACT scores, least ethical standards, most teenage smokers, highest murder rate and death rate by firearm, shortest life expectancy, worst education system (dumb kids), least high school graduates per capita, least college grads per capita, highest in violent crime, etc.
...and the North leads the nation in winey little peckerheads like you.
You have not been to Chicago!
It looks like the west and the NE lead the nation in fascism.
You know VO5? If you're going to preen about how well educated northerners are as compared to southerners....perhaps you should raise the standard of your writing skills? Clearly you're not among the northern counterparts that you're braying about.
If the South is do bad the North should let us go!
 June 29, 2015 at 12:29pm
How does that make Jefferson’s assertion any less true?
 June 29, 2015 at 11:42am
Excellent quote, but I’m guessing you’ll receive a lot of down votes from the Blaze crowd for even posting this. Perhaps, without consciously realizing it, they would ultimately prefer a totalitarian theocracy regime. I guarantee that if the Supreme Court and Obama Admin were gutting the Constitution based off of teachings of the Bible then these people would be perfectly fine with that. The religious right wants the power to control, but they just think the wrong people have the power right now.
For all the frothing against Iran, they're too dumb to realize that's essentially the system of government they're advocating for.
Iran forces their lgbltqui into sex reassignment. A MeccaRainbowMosque would know that. Baaah. Baah.
speaking of frothing - here's foo, right on queue...
So, how were you two genius' created equal?
 June 29, 2015 at 11:11am
There are over 41,000 different Christian denominations throughout the world. Either one of them is correct or all of them are incorrect. But it’s amazing how people refuse to even acknowledge this simple point, instead, opting for what brand of Christianity best suits them.
I think it's call Freedom to Worship as you see fit. It would seem a lot of people are having a hard time with that concept lately. I say that as long as it doesn't call to harm anyone, leave them alone.
 June 27, 2015 at 2:05pm
[-7] June 26, 2015 at 1:29pm
Well, Franklin Graham, your bible nor your religion is the law of the land. If so, it would be a totalitarian regime since our country was founded. Our founders drafted a GODLESS constitution for a very wise reason.
You're exactly right. And most people who feel like Franklin Graham really and truly want a theocratic government, not a democratic or republic government. But they'll never admit that because that's exactly what Iran has.
The country was prediated on Natural law, not on v15 law.
You intentionally or blindly confuse form and content, as do most socialists. Your claim is but propaganda.
The U.S. Constitution's content is that of a highly spiritual document, authored by deeply spiritual men.
It's form intentionally does not endorse a specific religion, and specifically protects freedom of religion.
This decision went against our democratic government. It went against public referendums and state constitutional ammendments.
This decision went against our republican government. These justices were not elected and had no right to impose their will as they do not represent us. Their job is to enforce the WRITTEN law and interpret OUR Constitution. They have no power to add, expand or create. What they did is despotic.
 June 26, 2015 at 12:49pm
Blest, am I to infer that you would rather see right-wing extremists kill thousands of people than to see all citizens afforded equal protection of the law? Our constitution w/ the amendments was drafted to grant equal rights to ALL citizens, gays included. What you see as destruction, I see as a positive move forward. I do find it ironic that people claim to want the government out of their marriage yet they run to the government via the courts when they get a divorce. I think the only thing we have in common is the belief that our government is far too big and all encompassing. Big government threatens freedom, as does Big Business and the crooked politicians on both sides of the aisle.
"" Our constitution w/ the amendments was drafted to grant equal rights to ALL citizens, gays included." Taking todays ruling to the next step and using your reasoning might mean a tax break for me- I love my siblings, so I'll marry them all, I love one of my minor nieces so I'll add her to the list, might toss in a neighbor or two also- nothing stopping me if equal rights are for ALL citizens- no more state laws on marrying relatives, minors, - and with the way the court is legislating might be able to claim my pets also.
Hey v15….marriage isn’t a "right". It even requires a license by the State to be able to get married legally. That means that the state can deny a license since they are the one’s who issue the licenses. But, it doesn’t mean that Marriage isn’t something that a man and a wife can’t engage in if they don’t have a license. God is the only one who is the determiner of what a valid sacramental Marriage is, and is not. It doesn’t require a license to be validated.
A license is just a piece of paper that helps the government keep track of demographics of the dynamic relationships between individuals in society, their movement within the construct of the government’s influence, and their role as rightful citizens under the protection, and scope of governmental services to them. It helps to keep order and maintain some semblance of control of the populace to ensure proper treatment is afforded to individuals e.x…to make sure polygamy isn’t committed, determining the rightful distribution of community property of divorced couples, etc….etc…etc.
Rights are given to us by God. And, he alone has the Authority to set the parameters of availing ourselves of those rights we seek to enjoy engaging in. Not men. All men can do is attempt to limit, or abolish those rights through the types of decisions made, that will result in oppressive activities because of it, that were exemplified in this ruling.
The problem is that the Supreme Court just created legislation. That sets a precedent, and now all future courts of law will be able to do the same, including ones that are right-wing extremist judges.
See, just because the winds blow in your favor today, that doesn't mean they will in the future. A future supreme court can now, based on today's ruling, use opportunities to push legislation that goes against what you believe.
They blatantly said that the Constitution doesn't matter, and that they can interpret it however they like. So what's to stop a future supreme court from interpreting the Constitution to mean that homosexuals should be killed under Sharia Law?
NOTHING. That's what.
Also, since the SCOTUS no longer abides by the Constitution, there is no reason or logic in caring about what they do or say or think. They have committed Lawfare against the people, and the people are now duty-bound to respond.
Yeah see how equal it will be when THEY MAKE Churches wed against their constitutional rights! This was never about Gay rights it was about the destruction of Christianity!
@V15 -- I read your post three times, and I can't believe 112 people (as I type) actually think that your ridiculous series of contradictions make any sense.
Marriage and divorce should not be within the purvue of the federal government. Unfortunately what this ruling means is that the law will be used not only to allow same-sex couples to marry but it also means that anyone whose religious beliefs or personal convictions run contrary to that ruling will be persecuted...in their jobs, social life and political lives. Watch as it is used as the "bat" to beat "wrong-thinking" people into submission.
tc5, arguably, that is the foreseen endgame.
Do you have a clue about the issue? Or, anything in your diatribe? Speakingoif non-sequiturs, illogic.What are you talking about? Oh, I forgot. It's not about the reality males being created for females and visa versa. And if same sex attraction is innate, then evolution would have eliminated it a long time ago since it does not contribute to the survival of the species never mind he fittest, which they would not be. And studies demonstrate the high rate of childhood molestation by the same sex experienced by same sex indulgers. They also make up 30% of child molesters. Not bad for a group that comprises at best 1.8% of the population. Let's not talk about STDs running rampant in the same sex crowd. And the "bug" chasers, those trying to contract HIV/AIDS. Yes, it is a same sex disease. Do you see a problem here? Nah, I did not expect you to because it is not about reality for proponents or common and statutory law. It is about feelings. Keep running your life this way particularly when spending money.
Right wings are killing people?????????????? WTH???????????????
You cannot change the color of your skin, but you can change your behaviors...instead of accepting this perversion, we should pity these people because they are mentally dysfunctional. The Constitution, which I gather you have never read, does not cover behaviors... these people are no different than the pediophile, people who have sex with animals or killers..they all act on urges.
The equal protections are not being applied to Christians in government, places of work, military, or their own business. The government is far to big and intrusive and corrupt. I do wonder what is being help over Justice Roberts' head for him to come to the screwy conclusions he has come to recently. He is opening a real can of worms without thinking through it clearly. I believe that he is either being bribed or he or his family threatened.
[-12] June 26, 2015 at 12:37am
If you feel this country is dead, then feel free to leave, bud. I’m pretty happy – one less racist flag, one less racist cop! Now go back down in your homophobic bomb shelter, troll. :)
We'd prefer to kick uneducated, dumbed down dolts such as yourself out so we'll start there. Racist cop? How the heck did you get that from this picture and article. You sir (or mam) are an idiot.
[-3] June 25, 2015 at 10:39pm
The same Bill O’Reily that lied about covering the Falkland War from a war zone when he wasn’t even there? Give me a break!
 June 22, 2015 at 3:30pm
Blink, I’m starting to feel sorry for the Ken Hams of the world because their ideology is becoming more and more absurd the more that science advances. And, by dong so, these Christians have painted themselves into a corner where their beliefs are just that – beliefs, devoid of facts, reality, logic, and even common sense.
So believing that everything came from nothing, and life came from non-life, and that literally everything on earth is related despite the fact that these beliefs are contrary to several established scientific laws and the evolutionary theories cannot be observed or tested as science requires—those beliefs are full of common sense, logic, reality, and facts?
'Something came from nothing'
Theist belief, not a scientific one. Science does not say something came from nothing but if you're going to pull the 'something cannot come from nothing' argument, where did god come from? Oh wait, god gets a free pass on your own BS.
And every living thing on earth is related and science has no problem with that, no law or theory dictates otherwise.
Right. Because atheism doesn’t operate on any beliefs at all. I mean if you start out all of your posts saying “Atheism isn’t a faith or a belief. I don’t believe atheism is true” then you’d save people a lot of trouble. Otherwise, say “I believe atheism is true” and we’ll not have to discuss what you mean by “belief”.
But you’re right. I mean, here’s the basic logical path of atheism:
1. Evolution is science.
2. I do science with my brain.
3. My brain is the result of a mindless, unguided evolutionary process.
4. Mindless, unguided processes cannot be trusted.
5. My brain cannot be trusted.
6. The science that I do with my brain cannot be trusted.
7. Evolution cannot be trusted.
I bet Ken Ham is feeling pretty stupid right about now. I mean, with iron-clad logical incoherence like that, why would ANYBODY be skeptical of it?
Atheism is lack of belief in gods. An atheist does not have to understand, know about, or accept evolution. Past that you are making wonderful strawmen fallacies about science in general.
1. Yes, it is.
2. In part, yes.
3. You don't understand evolution apparently.
4-7: Refer to 3.
Or just quit making strawmen.
blink, "Theist belief, not a scientific one. Science does not say something came from nothing but if you’re going to pull the ‘something cannot come from nothing’ argument, where did god come from?"
So If science does not say something came from nothing, where does that something come from? The fact that you can't see how foolish that is frightening.
The big bang is, by it's very description, something happening to something. You will find no scientist anywhere at anytime saying something came from nothing, and the fact that they don't yet have an answer to satisfy you doesn't mean they "think" anything.
It is theists who believe in the 'something from nothing' idea and because they believe that they have to believe a god did it.
We do not yet know what came before the big bang, but nowhere in science will you find the concept of 'something came from nothing'.
So the actual question is not 'where did everything come from', we know where it came from, it came from the big bang but 'what came before the big bang', and the answer to that is we don't know yet.
 June 22, 2015 at 3:22pm
If you believe that the world is 6,000 years old, then I really do not want you voting in any election anyways. Just my thoughts.
Why acknowledge that when you can just say racist and white in the same sentence, right?
 June 14, 2015 at 7:17pm
I think once you open the “trans” door then you can be trans-anything, which is great if you want to live in a world of absurdities. I, however, would rather it be characterized as a mental illness, because it’s the only rational and sane argument that I’ve heard thus far.