User Profile: VetMike


Member Since: September 22, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [5] January 22, 2015 at 9:18am

    And they don’t mention what Sherman did to the South nor what Reconstruction did to the South.

  • [2] January 22, 2015 at 9:12am

    As soon as a politician says: “I promise” clamp your hand over your wallet and run away.

  • [5] January 22, 2015 at 9:09am

    It will be bounced, of course but not because of the reasons you cite. The baker did refuse service by saying she would do the bible shaped cakes but not with the wording the customer requested. The gay marriage was equivalent. If the baker in that case had offered the cake without the gay couple figures on top I doubt that their outcome would have been different. No, this case gets bounced because it was brought by someone on the Right. And, no, I don’t condone the message.

    Responses (5) +
  • [2] January 21, 2015 at 11:37am

    Okay Christos. Let’s try on this nice jacket. We’ll adjust the sleeve length later.

  • [2] January 21, 2015 at 11:35am

    So it wouldn’t be worth it? Thank God you weren’t around during the American Revolution.

  • [71] January 21, 2015 at 11:16am

    Morals and modesty are about boundaries. Unfortunately, the word isn’t in any Liberal’s dictionary.

  • January 21, 2015 at 11:00am

    Funny how the various techniques we have for dating are oh so wonderful when the confirm something a Liberal believes but crappy, unreliable junk when they confirm something a Conservative believes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] January 20, 2015 at 12:23pm

    Gee, thanks for dropping by.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 20, 2015 at 12:16pm

    Darn it! Some dust blew in my eyes!

  • [5] January 20, 2015 at 11:21am

    Something is very crazy here. The man has a legal substance but the police show up with a warrant. For what? Is it alleged that he was endangering children? If so then the State must prove the allegations. Why examine the children in an ambulance and who examined them? Was there a Doctor or Nurse there? What imminent danger was present that the officer could use to remove the children without a warrant? Many questions and I doubt we will ever see justice served here. But it is scary ass crazy that the Sheriff believes that he can just take children without probable cause. But then I think back to Waco. The government had no problem burning alive 15 children under the age of 10 and 60 or so adults so this was easy. If this man had resisted the Sheriff would have been happy to bring the fires of Hell down on him and kill him and his entire family. And the ‘investigation’ would have exonerated him. The lesson is that you stand no chance against thugs like this. They have the badge and the entire legal system behind them. We are utterly defenseless against them.

  • January 19, 2015 at 3:03pm

    See ya. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

  • [5] January 19, 2015 at 2:59pm

    Weinstein claims to have started his campaign against religion because he was severely harassed and even beaten by Evangelical Christians while at the Academy. He also claims he witnessed severe anti-Semitism while at the Academy and later during his service. He served ten years as a commo officer and then as a lawyer. He lost the case he brought against the Ar Force because he couldn’t find anyone who had attended the Academy to affirm his claims. He started the MRFF allegedly in response to the claims of proselytizing and harassment in the Military. It has been noted by some that he has the highest ratio of CEO pay to income of any ‘charity’ in the US. He is also a voting member of the Board (of 3 members) and thus votes for his own salary. To accusations that he is an atheist Weistein has stated that he is a Agnostic Jew. Lastly, he has stated (Nov 2014) that Christianity in America poses the same kind of threat as does Islam.
    Lastly, I cannot understand how putting “A Mission For God and Country” on a sign is a “stunning, unConstitutional disgrace’ and a ‘outrageously ghastly graphic”. I would think that throwing gay off of four story buildings, stoning women to death for being raped and selling young girls into sexual slavery would beat out “A Mission For God And Country for “outrageous, ghastly graphic’ most any day. But when you know that Christians won’t cut your head off for criticizing them it is easy (and cowardly) to accuse them of atrocities.

  • [1] January 19, 2015 at 2:33pm

    Easy solution. Let a disguised and unarmed high level politician. Leave his bodyguard behind and no announcement is made. This will approximate the average citizen (serf is a better word but isn’t PC) entering one of these ‘no go zones’. If he comes out put him on national TV and let him honestly describe his trip. Or gather up four or so right off the street civilians and invite them to Haji’s Fine Iranian Dining in the heart of No-Go Ville. Do this four three nights spread randomly over the week. Publish the results. This will never happen because 1) Politicians don’t want to admit that there are areas in which they do not have control; 2) Left wing PCers will go nuts and prevent them from actually describing what happened unless all the Muslims gathered round and sang “Welcome to our little piece of heaven”; 3) Politicians themselves will prevent the truth from coming out because they are too terrified to do anything else.
    If non-Muslims are free to go in and out of Muslim enclaves, prove it. Don’t spin it, don’t tap dance around it. Prove it.

  • [2] January 19, 2015 at 12:15pm

    Exactly. The Danbury Church was worried that the Federal Government would try to dictate what they believed not the other way around. There were states that had protected or state funded religions and the Danbury Baptists were not one of those. Most people ignore the letter itself and concentrate on Jefferson’s answer. His ‘Letter to the Danbury Baptists’ Is delightfully vague and dose not address their concerns except to quote the establishment clause.

  • [6] January 19, 2015 at 12:03pm

    Thanks for stopping by. Will you be donating to Dorian’s defense fund?
    Let us be clear. Liberals enable the entitlement expectations of minorities. We have spent trillions in the ‘War on Pverty” and we have more poor people (of all races) hen ever before. Why? Because Democrats tell them that they can’t care for themselves so the government will do it. If you can’t see that such an attitude is even more racist then what you find here then I feel sorry for you. The only difference is that the racism of Liberals is just more subtle. It is also much more harmful. A few people here unable to see the difference between thugs and good folks. Most of us understand that these subhumans are as much a danger to Blacks as they are to every other race. The guy who was robbed was most likely Black and I’m sure he isn’t happy about what happened.
    I realize that most of this will go right by you so let me relate a story from my high school days. My best friend and I were driving and we were cut off and barely missed being in a very bad accident. My friend shouted out “You dumb ni**ers”. To say I was flabbergasted would be an understatement as my friend is very black. I asked him what he was thinking and he said “There’s ni**ers and black folk. They are ni**ers.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] January 19, 2015 at 11:51am

    They won’t. The South has been demonized and the Reconstruction ignored. Sherman indiscriminately burning entire towns to the ground and permitting his soldiers to rape and loot doesn’t appear in any history book. The fact that every slave trader was from the Northeast is ignored. Much of the ‘old money’ in the Boston area was derived from whaling and/or slave trading. The fact that many (most?) slaves were taken in raids and sold by Arabs or other African tribes is ignored. The lies and half truths are legion but the Liberals have been allowed and abetted in spreading their anti-South drivel. I deplore slavery and I think it was one of the dumbest ideas we ever had but I also hate lies and liars.
    As for the statue, the sculptor should tell the school to pizz off. No more statues for you and you have to pay to have it sent back.

  • [17] January 19, 2015 at 11:37am

    Because they are watching us. Any such effort would require a lot of co-ordination and training. The DHS, NSA and all the other alphabet soup agencies are always on the alert for such things and would pounce on us in a heart beat. Liberals would say “We have a political process” but that process has been prostituted to the agenda of politicians (of all stripes). The FBI is a joke, the BATF is the Keystone Kops of Federal Obama Presidential Decree Enforcement Agencies and the DHS is just a hiding place for thugs. I double dog dare any government “law” enforcement type that reads this to post and prove me wrong.

  • [12] January 19, 2015 at 11:30am

    I am just tickled pink when articles like this pull the Deniers and Anti-Semites out of their hovels. I can spend hours reading their posts howling with laughter.

  • [6] January 19, 2015 at 11:22am

    My Grandfather fought thru North Africa and into Italy. He had a still camera and a small 8m the whole way. As a kid I saw a few of them and was amazed. Unfortunately they were all lost or destroyed.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 17, 2015 at 1:07pm

    Notice how the liberal trolls (yes you Cobalt and you catty) tried very hard to divert the argument. I’m not worried though. The Liberals will soak up all the rounds coming down range which will give me time to finish my preps. It’s a collapsing defense. Let the enemy tire himself out on useless targets while you draw him in. And I won’t feel bad watching Liberals go under the sword.

123 To page: Go