It’s like you’re channeling my thoughts. Nailed it. Right progressives are just as dangerous and are as much a threat to our freedom and rights as those on the left. Thank you for saying it so well! 100% agreed!
July 16, 2013 at 6:18pm
And here we go again. Has this administration not learned? So looking forward to another run on guns and ammo.
the "brilliant" mind under Janet Reno who
was responsible for the Waco disaster.
This dope has never been anything but a failure.
Doing the right thing isn't something he comprehends-
in fact, he goes OUT of his way to do the wrong thing
and seems to derive wicked pleasure........just like his boss.
Crap, we are still dry here. Didn't think about that. Just thinking "keep your dirty nose out of state laws".
well he does have a card in his pocket that "black first ,justice last"
July 3, 2013 at 8:32am
Bingo, I think it’s really simple as that and nothing nefarious or concerning necessarily (as long as these people who are exercising their right are doing so responsibly and are not “absent minded” gun owners). Larger numbers = larger sample size = increase in numbers. Basic statistics.
July 1, 2013 at 3:50pm
Absolutely no problem with this. It was completely under control. It’s no different with guns, drinking, etc. Teach your kids about safety when they’re young and they’ll be better off in the long run.
April 3, 2013 at 4:43pm
Wow, MAPACHE, she went “full-tard” with that comment, flew right by “half”.
April 2, 2013 at 9:28am
Hemp, you beat me to it…Agree. I’d say there’s a lower instance of people reporting or admitting to gun ownership. I don’t blame them as I wouldn’t respond either :>
March 28, 2013 at 10:00am
“But resist we much… we must… and we will much… about… that… be committed.”
VTPATRIOT Ya, that day his tongue got in front of his eye teeth and he couldn't see what he was saying.
December 17, 2012 at 12:11pm
First, please know I’m not a biblical scholar nor am I currently a person of deep faith, but I do believe in God. I do take serious issue, though, with the whole angle of “Why does God allow”. The narrative that “it’s God’s plan” when something like this happens. I honestly can’t believe that God would want to cause so much pain and suffering. Why can’t it simply be that sometimes evil/Satan wins. For me, that’s a whole lot more reassuring and conducive, for me at least, to believing in a higher power of good. Because if it’s the former, I don’t want to believe in a God that would ever let something like this happen.
Maybe that's what caused World Trade tower 7 to fall ?
2 minutes of your life for the Truth
Rumsfeld and Lieberman deny tower 7 ever fell
Tower7, here is some intelligent reading for you... naturally, you'll simply dismiss it as lies.
As for the article... I think it is pretty clear that these trucks aren't "demolishing a building," but rather "pulling down an overhang, with considerable effort, whilst being aided by an excavator"
Freedom Please explain rumsfelds lake of knowledge ?
are you that Naive ?
yes FREEDOM I am Aware of the official story
" Fire alone brought down the building, the report concludes, pointing to thermal expansion of key structural members as the culprit. The report also raises concerns that other large buildings might be more vulnerable to fire-induced structural failure than previously thought."
I guess you did not look at the tower 7 video did you ?
hey Everyone FREEDOM thinks this is what a fire does to a building
here is another one
please show me a video of another burning building that fell into it's own footprint
remember the fire in Singapore ? How many hours did that sky scraper burn ?
the best proof that Popular Mechanics Lied
why is Glenn so quick to except this Bull crap ?
Don't bother trying to reason with him Freedom. He and the other conspiracy types can't be reasoned with. They will only believe want they want to and any logical evidence you present to them will somehow be twisted to prove their wacky theories even more. If you told them the sky was blue, they would argue that with you if it didn't fit their theory.
Tower7.......get a job
"Don’t bother trying to reason with him Freedom. He and the other conspiracy types can’t be reasoned with."
Yeah, I used to frequent the Loose Change forums, many years ago. I was the certainly most civil person there, but they didn't like having their video openly debunked, so I was frequently banned. I had one guy go for pages and pages, often swearing and typing in all caps, insisting that the outer 3 rings of the Pentagon had concrete walls separating the bottom 2 stories, despite pictures which clearly showed the contrary. Some of them, like Tower7, will never let their ego be damaged by accepting that they bought into a hoax.
I post the link so there is some truth for the gullible to look at. 9/11 conspiracy theories are absolute garbage and it is a shame when someone actually falls for it.
Sure you guys can't reason with me, but I read your stuff before you did and
am using reason and logic, you don't talk about the free fall of tower 7 because
that would take a serious effort on your part.
So I ask who is being unreasonable here ?
All I will say, Tower7, is that there has never been another case in history where two jets loaded with fuel rammed two 100+ story buildings, causing them to topple in the middle of a city packed with tall buildings. Yes, it is the first time that we know of that a building of that size (WTC7) has collapsed primarily to fire. It is also the first time a building of that size has had two massive skyscrapers collapse across the street.
Don’t bother trying to reason with him Tower. He and the other government propaganda types can’t be reasoned with. They will only believe want they want to and any logical evidence you present to them will somehow be twisted to prove their wacky theories even more. If you told them the sky was blue, they would argue that with you if it didn’t fit their theory.
Clever Zenga, you took my post and turned it around against me. Did you high five the other pot smoking conspiracy theory wackos in your moms basement after you posted that one?
Tower7. Those buildings burned because some dufuss with the EPA and OSHA decided years ago that asbestos was causing cancer in some people that smoked. The truth is if the asbestos ahd been applied to the beams the likelyhood of a fire would have much reduced.. The "fireproof" stuff they use now is not fireproof.
January 16, 2012 at 4:14pm
Someone has to call it…can’t believe it hasn’t been posted yet…FAKE! I’m assuming the “snazzy stunts” is a hint at that…if not…it’s not only a slow news day at The Blaze, but a gullible one too.