User Profile: WakeUp


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] December 15, 2014 at 1:38pm

    The gun was just a tool he used. Why not file a suit against the car manufacturer that got him there? Or how about the mental health facilities that did not treat his illness? or his parents for “allowing him to be himself” rather than teaching him right from wrong?

    Responses (1) +
  • December 15, 2014 at 12:53pm

    Yes, How about at the world trade center in NYC

  • December 15, 2014 at 12:48pm

    Why is it that liberals always want to claim they have some kind of exclusive claim on “science” yet there isn’t a single issue that they are willing to look at ALL of the facts. Liberals just want to pick and choose which “facts” they like and either ignore, distort or slander all the facts they don’t like. If you truly believe in science then you accept where the facts lead, even though the predominance of fact disputes almost every liberal theory.

  • December 15, 2014 at 12:40pm

    Apparently you never read the Constitution. The ONLY government limit the Constitution allows is that CONGRESS may not establish a religion. As the same document defined Congress, I’m sure the writers knew exactly what Congress is. There are NO Constitutional limits on state or local governments endorsing a religion at all. And before you start to say “yeah but the Supreme Court decided”… remember that the SC has historically ignored the Constitution and made politically based decisions. Think of Dred Scott as an example.

  • December 15, 2014 at 12:37pm

    DesertRose, You sound awfully brainwashed. Open your eyes to some facts instead of whatever “sounds good”.

  • [7] December 15, 2014 at 12:33pm

    Snowleopard – the reason atheists only go after Jews and Christians is that they are deep down scared to death of God. They want to make their own decisions and live their own lives, but deep down they know they will be held accountable, and they resent that. Allah can’t do that, so there is no fear of him.

    Responses (7) +
  • [8] December 15, 2014 at 12:29pm

    There are over 300 predictions in the old testament that exactly point to Jesus. Yes, he could have faked a couple of them, like riding into Jerusalem on a donkey, but most of them he had no control over. How could he have faked where he was born. The old testament states he would be born on Bethlehem which was a tiny little town, What a coincidence! How about his lineage? Or the exact – to the day – timing of his birth? or how he would be crucified which was in variance to the normal Roman methods? As I said, there are over 300 predictions, so you can believe he was “just a man” if you want. Someday you will wish you opened your mind a little more.

    Responses (10) +
  • [1] December 15, 2014 at 12:24pm

    I guess 20% don’t believe in our Constitutional rights. The Constitution clearly states that CONGRESS may not establish a national religion, but it also states that our free exercise of religion is a guaranteed right. Putting up a display on public property is exactly what the Constitution was guaranteeing.

    Responses (1) +
  • [25] December 14, 2014 at 12:18pm

    Mohammad also wrote on the “rights” Muslims have to lie, steal and cheat others. They have a “right” to kill anyone that doesn’t agree with them, they have a “right” to treat women (even Muslim women) as slaves.

    Somebody please tell me why Mohammad is called a “good man” and a “peace loving” man by the media?

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] December 13, 2014 at 10:20am

    Scrooples: Yes this socialist movement is returning. Unfortunately, the American Jewish population is the one propping up the socialist democrat party. I could never understand why. If you step back and look objectively at what they do, they are no different than Germany’s socialists in the 30′s.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] December 10, 2014 at 8:31am

    Correct. Most liberals are too stupid to understand that the reason the Nazi’s were called “right wing” is because in 1930′s Germany, the two major parties were the communists and the socialists. The socialists were slightly to the right of the communists. By US standards, both are far left. By the way, the communists (under Stalin) committed more slaughter of their own people than the Nazis.

  • [3] December 10, 2014 at 8:28am

    The Tea party is a conceptual group of people that have many varying views on many topics. The only two things you need to support is 1) The government is subordinate to the people and 2) The government is too big and spends too much.

    You have to wonder about the agendas of people that lie and slander the Tea party.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] December 8, 2014 at 6:37pm

    She should counter-sue for violation of her constitutional rights.

    The Constitution prohibits Congress from establishing a national religion, but it also protects every individuals right to freely practice their religion. How is a private business offering a discount equal to Congress establishing a national religion?

  • December 7, 2014 at 11:19am

    Third party candidates typically cause the worst of the other two to win. Third party only works when more than 50% is required to win. Everyone should push their states to make that a law.

    In the meanwhile, the best alternative is to use the primary system to move the party in the right direction. That has been very successful in recent years.

    Both parties may still be controlled by big government politicians, but the gop is slightly less so than the dems. Even if it’s only a little bit, at least the pendulum has has changed to move in the right direction…. even if it will take a long time. Remember, it took almost 60 years for the democrats to change from a party of the people, to a left wing, power grabbing, communist organization.

  • [1] December 7, 2014 at 11:11am

    Since when does the Obama administration support the right to breathe? It’s a privilege granted by the government.

  • [3] December 6, 2014 at 11:14am

    Typical liberal journalist. She has no clue that her real job IS to question stories and validate facts. As a liberal she just cares about whether the story is liberal or conservative before deciding whether she believes it’s true or not.

  • [5] December 2, 2014 at 10:14am

    Actually you are wrong. Drudge was an LA Times reporter that got tired of being told which stories he could not report so he started the web site as a place to post those stories. Not surprisingly, the stories being censored by the LA Times all seemed to be the ones favoring conservatives.

  • December 1, 2014 at 12:27pm

    If someone can’t fly without their “emotional support” pig, then they shouldn’t fly.
    The airline should worry about EVERYONES rights, not just one persons. What if the person in the next seat was Muslim? Do their rights matter?

  • [24] December 1, 2014 at 12:01pm

    Just wondering. How many reporters were forced to resign over what they said about Palin’s daughters, or Bush’s daughters?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] November 30, 2014 at 3:42pm

    Why is it that when a democrat is in the lime light we are told “the Presidents children” are out of bounds. When a republican is in the lime light, the same hypocrits say “they are fair game”?
    Compare how the media reacted to any negative news about Chelsia Clinton when she was young, and to the Obama girls,.. to how they treated Bush’s daughters and Sarah Palins kids.

123 To page: Go