User Profile: waldens1


Member Since: September 01, 2010


  • August 17, 2015 at 8:34am

    So, she is an “editor” and she used the word “than” when she should have used “then.” That tells me all I need to know.

    Responses (2) +
  • [17] July 3, 2015 at 11:03am

    AND NC is an Open carry state. So basically the law says that you can open carry but if your open carry scars someone then you are breaking the law. Talk about two laws being at odds with each other. I live in NC and I open carry all the time.

  • [8] June 13, 2015 at 6:22am

    because the Dems held the purse strings (house and senate) for the last two years and ignored his warnings about the housing bubble! Need proof?
    here ya go

  • [13] June 13, 2015 at 6:21am

    because the Dems held the purse strings (house and senate) for the last two years and ignored his warnings about the housing bubble! Need proof?
    here ya go

  • [6] June 11, 2015 at 7:20am

    There is a systematic genocide against blacks and it is being pushed and perpetrated by the Democratic Party and Planned Parenthood. That is why PP is in mostly Black, urban neighborhoods. Ask yourself this question. Despite being in this country for nearly as long as Whites, why do Blacks still only make up less than 15% of the population? Do you think that’s an accident?

  • [23] June 9, 2015 at 3:38pm

    From the video, it appears that, once again, we have an entitled person refusing to follow the instructions of law enforcement and all of a sudden it the officers fault. So, if he tells the girl to put her hands behind her back so he can cuff her and she refuses, is he supposed to just say “Okay, you got me, you win?” So, when suspects refuse to cooperate, the cops just have to give up? NO. The answer is STFU and put your hands behind your damn back OR get ready to be thrown to the ground. Your choice.

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] June 9, 2015 at 8:40am

    Ignore Punx. This person is clearly one of Putins paid plants.

  • [2] April 23, 2015 at 8:42am

    Actually, we fully believe in science when there is actual scientific evidence and not just conjecture. Let’s take evolution for example. There is still NO evidence of one type of animal changing into another type of animal. Does life adapt to it’s environment, absolutely, does one species “evolve” into another, there is still no proof of that. The only thing that seems to evolve is ….well, science itself. a perfect example of this is the “Big Bang” theory. That has been the accepted “science” of how the universe was formed, for decades. It has been taught to countless children in school and yet, very recently, scientist are now saying that there was no “big bang.” Now they say that the universe is “eternal.” They have known for a very long time that the “big bang” theory violated basic principles of physics and they pushed it down our throats and told us to accept it as fact. Also, and this is going to astound you I am sure, the actual “Big Bang” theory was first proposed in 1927 by Monsignor Georges Lemaître, a high ranking Catholic Priest! That’s right! The bible loving Christians whom you seem to believe do not believe in science were the ones who came up with the “Big Bang.” You should read about his work and tell me again how Christians don’t believe in science. Maybe, YOU should stop believing everything that you are spoon fed by the Main Stream Media! Just a though.

  • [17] April 13, 2015 at 1:25pm

    If you want to know why no one in that that entire church had the hart to take that child in, all you have to do is go to the Churches website and look at who they are affiliated with ( Groups like the “South Florida Progressive Baptist Association” and the “State of Florida Progressive M & E Convention.” Go to any of their pages and you will see that when they say “Progressive” they actually do mean what you think they do. So, I get the feeling that if he had thrown himself on the mercy of a less “Progressive” “Church,” he may have left that day with a family who was ready to take him in. Just another example of the compassionate left telling us to do what they SAY and NOT WHAT THEY DO!

  • [3] April 11, 2015 at 8:18am

    That “kid” was a straight up wanna be thug and a punk who got exactly what he deserved. The officer asked him tom comply multiple times and he refused specifically because he knew he had drugs on him and was busted. I guess when officers chat a criminal red handed they just have to leave him alone if he decides that he will not comply with the officers? This is what happens when our youth embrace the thug culture.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 11, 2015 at 8:14am

    I agree 100% (FYI, I was with 5th Group, you?)

  • [5] April 11, 2015 at 7:52am

    I’d to take a moment and point out a glaring error and general misconception that exists in this article and in the public. THIS IS NOT A DRONE! “Drones” are UNMANNED. This clearly is a remote controlled helicopter. RC enthusiast have been flying RC since the late 19th century starting with hydrogen-filled model airships flown by spark-emitted radio signal. This hysteria over “drones” is ALL MEDIA DRIVEN! It’s time we call the media out on the sensationalism of their “drone” stories.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] March 19, 2015 at 3:39pm

    OH and what a shock, the comments on the video have been disabled on youtube. Damn cowards don’t want to face the truth. Let’s do a similar video but each gun will tell a story of how it saved a life, stopped a rap, stopped a robbery or even fed a family. There would not be enough room in the whole store to house that many guns!

  • [3] January 28, 2015 at 12:33pm

    First let me say, Greta should NEVER, EVER, wear a turtle neck again! Okay, having said that, it’s nice to see someone in the President’s party who not only gets it but who is also not afraid to say it. She is going to be getting an ear full from the Administration, of that I am sure.

  • [15] October 8, 2014 at 9:24am

    oldgeek. Are you out of your damn mind? The cops did everything wrong. First off, the passenger is not responsible for having on his seatbelt, the driver is and the driver is the one who would be ticketed. Second, because the passenger is not responsible, the passenger does not have to provide ID. This is Nazi Germany where you have to produce your papers when asked. This is the United States of America and we have protections guaranteed us, by the 4th amendment of the constitution, against illegal searches. those cops are the real criminals in this video. If you can’t see that, then you are part of the problem. The minute you give the cops permission to search you, you have just forfeited your 4th amendment rights. I would have done the same thing as the passenger in this case. You must stand up for your rights or you will lose them.

  • [4] September 24, 2014 at 7:58pm

    Sorry Happy but you are dead wrong. The guy did not suspect the officer of any crime, saw the crime being carried out right in front of his face. The officer has NO RIGHT and NO AUTHORITY to ask for your identification, unless you are being detained on suspicion of committing a crime. The 4th amendment is VERY clear on this. You should not be so willing to give up your right to privacy my friend. It starts with a little nudge and then slowly, all of rights are eroded to the point that this country will be unrecognizable from its founding. I leave you with this thought:

    Being born free is an accident

    Living free is a struggle

    Dying free is an OBLIGATION!

    don’t falter on your obligation my friend

  • [6] September 24, 2014 at 7:48pm

    So, what you are saying is that, in order for that guy to have the rights to the services of the police, which he pays for with his tax dollars, he has to give up his constitutional rights? Wow! Folks like you, and your warped thinking, are a big part of the problem in this country.

  • [-1] May 22, 2014 at 11:17am

    How sad is it that I totally understand you name?

  • February 4, 2014 at 4:55pm

    No sir, we just don’t like when the gestapo tells us to show them our papers. Gun registration is the first move towards gun confiscation. I know, I know, you’re gonna tell me what a conservative conspiracy theorist I am. Well, there are millions of people still alive today who have lived through it. Don’t kid yourself into thinking that it can’t happen here. Besides, I thought that we were supposed to be a “free” society. It seems that government continues to put more and more restrictions and requirements on that “freedom.” In your mind, you think it’s in order to prevent gun violence, please tell me you are not that stupid (although liberal is your middle name…) How exactly does making, presumably, law abiding citizens, jump through hoops, in order to be able to defend themselves, going to stop gun violence? You have apparently learned nothing from history and isn’t that, after all, the real problem with liberals today?

  • November 10, 2013 at 10:18am

    The more you talk, the more ignorant you sound. You clearly do not understand the difference between conservative, Republicans and little r republicans. Until you do, you might want to consider keeping your thoughts to yourself as not to expose your ignorance further. Additionally, what does it say about a community that votes based solely on someone’s color? As far as I can tell, his message was consistence with his stance on issues, he just used black actors to state his message. Seems like a pretty racist community, against white people.
    What is really sad however, is that he will probably do a lot of good for that community but when it comes time to re-elect him, they will not see the good he did, only the color of his skin and they will vote in some liberal democrat who will take them back off the path to prosperity and put them back on the welfare plantation.

Restoring Love