User Profile: WardMD

Member Since: November 06, 2011

CommentsDisplaying WardMD's 10 most recent comments.

  • NO, Mayor Nannyberg, one does NOT CHANGE the Conssttitution, by simply “re-interpreting” it!

    Perhaps you haven’t heard of this (being so busing telling everyone in New York what to eat, and drink, and smoke, and think): It’s called an AMENDMENT.

    If one wishes to CHANGE the Constitution, one must AMEND IT!

    At least that’s how it’s SUPPOSED to work…

    Of course, I don’t blame YOU LIBERALS (Nannyberg included) for believing that all you need is a handful (literally) of judges to “declare” that it (the constitution) now means something DIFFERENT (you’re WRONG, but I understand why you think that way)!

  • Something ELSE she’ll discover while in college (well, MOST colleges), is that IF she’s a Republican, she would be better off NOT coming “out of the closet”.

    In MOST colleges (run by Liberal professors), Conservatives are the ONE group upon which it is STILL (ALWAYS) “Open Season”!

    Being a Political/Social dissent is the ONE form of “diversity” these professors simply won’t tolerate!

    A final few words of advice: LEARN something that will be of use to you in obtaining a decent paying job! Don’t put too much importance on that piece of parchment you seek (employers won’t – as evidenced by the McDonalds opening for a cashier – college degree AND two years experience REQUIRED)!

  • AND, you think the “contract” (aka a Permit to own/carry a gun) from ONE STATE should be recognized by ALL the other States (like the same-sex marriage proponents assert)?

  • While I don’t wish misfortune on ANYONE, IF Mr. Mayer is injured (or worse, killed) WITHOUT the ability to defend himself – THE BLAME will be squarely on the heads of the Politicians who have suspended his license!

    I hope the plethora of ambulance-chasing lawyers in New York are prepared to sue the pants off these politicians and the County of Suffolk!

  • You mean the SAME constraints that you IGNORED when YOU (unilaterally) declared that Congress WAS in recess, so YOU could appoint THREE people WITHOUT “bothering” with the Constitutionally mandated Advice and Consent (something that the appeals court has declared to be an UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT)?!

    SO, we’re to take YOUR word that you’d “respect” the Constitutions “constraints” on 2nd Amendment Rights, when you clearly DIDN’T give a Rat’s Rear End on Advise and Consent?!

    Well forgive me, but I DON’T TRUST YOU!

  • Remember: When SECONDS COUNT, the Police are “only” MINUTES AWAY!

  • Actually, Ms.Hudak’s comment was a non-sequitur!

    The statistic she mentioned (about for every 1 woman who defends herself, 83 are shot) was NOT saying that 83 women TRYING TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WITH A GUN were shot, it was that 83 women get shot for every ONE woman who defends herself).

    THAT statistic, ACTUALLY, supports the notion that EVERY WOMAN should be ARMED (so MORE women defend themselves, and FEWER are shot)!

    To suggest that we should ban guns “because” 83 women are shot (for every 1 who defends herself) is like saying we shouldn’t drive defensively, because over 40,000 people DIE every year in Automobile accidents!

    Carrying a gun is like driving defensively! It’s to PROTECT YOURSELF from the UNWANTED actions of others!

  • Remember! When SECONDS COUNT, the Police are MINUTES AWAY!

    The POLICE took 20 MINUTES to arrive at Sandy Hook! In that amount of time, a “Bolt Action” rifle (where EACH BULLET must be MANUALLY LOADED into the chamber, and the trigger pulled for EACH shot) can be shot in as little as FIVE SECONDS between shots (as did Lee Harvey Oswald with such a rifle when HE shot and killed President Kennedy)! In the 20 MINUTES it took Police to arrive, that “Bolt Action” rifle could have been fired 240 times (reloading notwithstanding)!

    To even SUGGEST that by banning (so-called) “Assault Weapons” would have PREVENTED Sandy Hook (or prevent FUTURE Sandy Hooks) is IGNORANT OF THE FACTS (and Dangerous to WE, THE PEOPLE [and our children])!

    THE BEST (only?) way to STOP a CRIMINAL WITH A GUN, is a well trained, ARMED non-criminal WITH A GUN (and the ability and willingness to USE IT)!

  • Sounds AMAZINGLY like the “Death Panels” of which Sarah Palin spoke (and for which she was criticized)!

    SO…

    It seems Palin WAS RIGHT (or simply ahead of her time)!

  • Hell, I think I’ll go out an buy a gun JUST to the Liberal Papers WILL print my name and address – so Criminals will know NOT to target MY HOUSE!

    Let the NY Papers publish (for the Criminals) ALL of the places NOT to rob – so those households WITHOUT GUNS can be TARGET!

    Perfect!