Sorry, All projections show Trump will go to Ohio with 25-40 bound delegates short. Pennsylvania’s unbound delegates, half of which are Trump supporters, signed a pact that they will vote for whoever won their district. Since Trump won every district, he is easily over the hump on the first vote. Sorry to burst your bubble.
April 27, 2016 at 11:32am
PA is more Patriotic than some think. The Delegates have signed a pact that they will vote for whoever wins their district. Half are Trump supporters, so that will put Trump over the top on the first vote.
April 27, 2016 at 11:28am
Then I guess you 40% will be responsible for the destruction of the U.S. as we know it. You whiney self absorbed, narcissistic @ holes have no respect for Liberty. You spout how 65% of the people do not vote for Trump as though that argument has merit. If it did, where does Cruz fall in, 80% don’t vote for HIM. Give me a break. I have been trying the wake people like you about the rigged system for years, way before Trump, but the walking dead think that is a conspiracy theory. Well, people are waking in masses. Get over it, Trump is the nominee, he will get 1237 on the first ballot and True Americans that understand what Hillary will do to this country will act like Patriots and vote for Trump.
 April 27, 2016 at 11:16am
Stopping illegal immigration (Were going to build a wall, I like immigration but it has to be legally), Trade deal’s, (I believe in free trade, but it has to be fair trade), Right to life (I believe in the right to life except for cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother).
There are three, of course Far Right Radical Conservatives, like Cruz, do not care about the life of the mother or the pain and anguish of a rape victim.
Any other stupid questions?
December 9, 2015 at 3:43pm
Half truths, You missed my point. Many here were all screaming about Obama, his mother was a citizen, but Cruz gets a by. That is what is hypocritical.
[-11] December 8, 2015 at 1:03pm
Chloe, I will not vote for someone who has a dual citizenship. Many here on The Blaze slammed Obama for his father not being a citizen and accused him of being born outside the U S.making him ineligible to run Now, a lot of you are looking at Cruz, who has the same scenario, his father a Cuban with a citizen mother, but in Cruz’s case, Hi birth certificate IS from outside the country, why? Because he is Republican? Because he talks a good game? How hypocritical!
[-1] December 2, 2015 at 1:48pm
Utopia, waste of a vote? So you think I should vote for someone I believe is not eligible to be POTUS? That would be a wasted vote. Cruz was born in Canada, not even a U.S. military base. His father was a Cuban national when he was born. You can live in your brainwashed world if you want, I will stick by the true qualification that both parents have to be citizens at the child’s birth to be a natural born citizen. His situation is worse than Obama’s was for crying out loud.
[-1] December 1, 2015 at 7:02pm
Remember all the flack about Obama and his citizenship status? Now a lot of you go for a candidate who had to denounce his dual citizenship and where his father, like Obama’s, was a foreigner at the time of his birth. I would prefer Paul to Cruz. I will probably end up voting Libertarian.
August 19, 2014 at 8:31pm
Blest, I understand, and agree with some of what you are saying, but when you threw in there that Ron Paul was bad and legalizing pot Is bad, I must disagree. I know you must like what Paul’s fiscal positions were right, but you are against his foreign policy, just like Beck. I happen to agree with non-intervention, unless Congress declares war, as it is the best way to be. Think of that like defending yourself from an attacker. If you attack someone because they say they are going to kick your butt, you go to jail. If you wait until he actually attacks and defend yourself, you do not, in most cases. Ron Paul was all for going to war and not holding back, if “The People” through Congress gives that authority.
As far as pot, why should it not be legal for those that want to use instead of alcohol? It is much safer for your health and is much safer as far as auto accidents than alcohol will ever be. The life and death issue? It is 5-life in Idaho for having 3 ounces in possession, so in a lot of respects, it is life or death.
 April 24, 2014 at 4:40pm
Listen to a Great Black Man talking about racism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhVJg1rum_k
We need to get off the BS racist crap that our government and media slam on us, especially when it is not true racism. I do not believe that Bundy is a racist. I posted the entire press conference on the first Blaze story on this, go there and watch it instead of listening to the snipits that the media, Blaze included, give us so we do not get the full story.
 April 24, 2014 at 4:23pm
Here is the entire hour long interview instead of the snipits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbnRnhrNFEY
Watch the entire thing, he talks about Mexicans and the Watts riots. I do not believe him to be a racist, just an old man that does not speak like a politician and the MSM which we all love to hate, the sounding board for our One Party System, will demonize him profusely.
Sosorryforyou, One other thing with your Constitution post, it is talking about territories owned by the Feds. Once the territory became a State, the land was supposed to become the property of the State and the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, should have been followed. Just so you know.
April 22, 2014 at 4:23pm
Sosorryforyou, Just because the Feds say it is so, does not mean it is right or Constitutional.
“…But this is not the most serious violation of the Constitution. The Founders understood that the size of land holding was proportionally related to the perceived size of the federal government and they intentionally wanted that perception small. The Federal government was permitted to have but 10 square miles for a federal capital. The only other land that they could acquire had to be for military purposes as specified in the common defense clause of the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17….” “…Again, in the case of the Bundys, the land in dispute was not purchased by the federal government, did not receive the consent of the Nevada State Legislature for sale to the feds and is not for military purposes. The fact that the federal government acquired it fraudulently in the first place, or that both political parties have ignored this part of the Constitution for over a hundred years, does not make federal confiscation now constitutional. Constitutionally Bundy has more right to be there than does the Bureau of Land Management.” http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/pearland/opinion/pease-why-does-the-federal-government-own-nevada/article_d5737f99-a90f-5189-acfd-90
TAX, You seem to be the one acting like a Democrat.
April 22, 2014 at 1:47pm
What attitude is that? Individual Liberty attitude? Small Federal Government attitude? Belief in the Constitution attitude? Fiscal responsibility attitude? The power of “The People” attitude? Of which do you refer?