User Profile: whatdoibelieve
Member Since: October 08, 2011
CommentsDisplaying whatdoibelieve's 10 most recent comments.
Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
Popular Stories
S.E. Cupp vs. Michael Moore on Guns: ‘I Just Happen to Be Informed’ 428 Comments
Sarah Palin Posts Pic of Alaska Snow: ‘Global Warming My Gluteus Maximus’ 353 Comments
Report: Hofstra Student Was Shot, Killed by Cop Trying To Rescue Her 348 Comments
Charles Krauthammer: IRS Scandal Could Be a ‘Fatal Problem’ for Obama 324 Comments
White House: ‘Irrelevant Fact’ Where Obama Was During Benghazi 255 Comments
Faith
-
Congressman: IRS Demanded to Know Content of Pro-Life Group's Prayers
Read More
-
You Criticized Obama: Famed Christian Radio Host Alleges Outrageous IRS Intimidation
175 Comments
-
Network Releases Statement on Pat Robertson's Controversial Advice to Cheated-On Women
160 Comments
-
'Blasphemy': Prominent Faith Leader Calls Obama Out Over His 'God Bless You' During Planned Parenthood Speech
197 Comments
-
Graphic New Details About Gosnell's Filthy and Flea-Ridden Home and Clinic Emerge: 'The Smells Were Just Unbearable'
Read More
Business
- This Map Shows the 'Riskiest' Places in the World 103 Comments
-
Krauthammer's Impressed With Obama's IRS Answers: He Makes Bill Clinton's Parsing Look Unsophisticated
Read More
-
Congressman: IRS Demanded to Know Content of Pro-Life Group's Prayers
Read More
- America off Limits: Soviet Tourists Were Banned from Visiting These Areas During the Cold War Read More
-
These Are the 4 Most Important Takeaways from Today's IRS Hearing
157 Comments
Technology
-
Woman Who Lost All Limbs to Flesh-Eating Bacteria Gets $200K Bionic Arms
Read More
-
Why Are These Zoo Keepers Baffled by This Anteater’s Babies?
Read More
-
Largest Lunar Explosion in NASA History Caught on Video
130 Comments
-
Ever Wonder How It'd Look to Have Your Face Eaten by a Bear? Here's Your Answer
Read More
-
New Energy Secretary Named With Unanimous Confirmation
153 Comments
The Blog
- Powerful Tornado Flattens Mobile Homes Near Oklahoma City, AP Reports
‘Arrogance…Abuse of Power…Rotten to the Core’: Paul Ryan Steamed Over IRS, Benghazi
She’s Back! Conservative Favorite Mia Love Announces 2014 Bid for Congress- CNN Poll: Obama’s Approval Rating Unchanged Since Scandals Hit
‘Unconstitutional’: AP CEO Blasts ‘Abusive’ Justice Dept. in First TV Interview Since Scandal Broke
Glenn Beck Radio
Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7
Listen Now
The Wire
- Tornadoes level homes in Okla., hit other states
- 10 Things to Know for Monday
- US adviser on board of firm that sold anthrax drug
- Young Americans waste no time qualifying for Indy
- Taylor Swift leads at Billboard Music Awards
- Tornado levels homes in Oklahoma City trailer park
- Tornado causes major damage at trailer park near Oklahoma City; spotter says earth 'scoured'
- Officer who shot NY student faced harrowing choice


























































































Family Probes Death of 8-Year-Old Daughter Believed ‘Murdered’ to Harvest Organs
May 15, 2013 at 9:25pm
Your comment is completely false. As a paramedic, I can assure you the doctors don’t even look at your ID to see if you are donor until one of two things occur.
1) You cannot be revived after significant amount of effort.
2) You are in a vegetative state and the family requests that you be taken off life support.
The doctors could care less in the ER if you are donor.
City Threatens Child’s Remarkable Playhouse Over Zoning Laws
April 30, 2013 at 2:37pm
“They were actually warned by code enforcement authorities when they were constructing the playhouse back in December, but proceeded to build it anyway.”
They clearly knew what they were doing was against the historical district regulations. They made the choice to continue building it, probably with the intention of fighting it later if they had too. What they probably weren’t expecting was a $1000 variance fee and a $25 daily fine while they were fighting it. They didn’t think through their decisions in the past very well and now they have a choice, tear it down or come up with the money and fight.
I also wonder if “I can’t afford $1,000 to just apply for a variance. I don’t have that type of money” really means I don’t want to use it for a variance. Because why on earth do you have a massive playhouse with electrical and a T.V. for your kid if you don’t have $1000 in savings?
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 10:22pm
Why does someone pay thousands of dollars to advertise on Facebook when that company is openly hostile towards their beliefs? It is well known that Facebook is a heavily left leaning company. Why do conservatives give it money?
I am not saying get off Facebook. Use it for free. Create pages for free. But give your advertising dollars to like-minded companies. You could even use those advertising dollars to point people to your Facebook page. But why give them your dollars directly?
I say leech off these companies. Use their services and don’t engage in behavior with them that generates them money (paying for advertising, clicking on ads, participating in surveys, or even more importantly buying their stock) But honestly, how many of you actually hold Facebook stock? Check your portfolio, you may not use Facebook, but don’t be surprised if you find it lumped in a mutual fund you own.
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 10:05pm
@Pittac1
Seriously. You hurl an insult with every comment. Your profile was created today and you only post on this story. Looks like you are somehow tied to the company. Really not a good impression to be insulting on every comment.
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 9:55pm
@TheDHndrsn
Your comment is awesome!
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 9:52pm
@Pittac1
I am assuming you are in some way associated with the company in the article. Which is why I am singling you out. If you are not, I am sorry.
The store is getting free advertising on The Blaze. This is the target audience. This is going to generate traffic to the website. Don’t ruin it by being mean. You may be right on some issues, but being mean about it isn’t honorable and doesn’t show integrity.
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 9:49pm
@Pittac1
You don’t pay “to be there”. Be nice. You pay for advertising.
Gun Store Running AR-15 Giveaways on Facebook Sees Page Shut Down — And Facebook Hasn’t Contacted Him to Say Why
April 21, 2013 at 9:46pm
@Pittac1
First, lets all be nice. What happens to you stinks but we have to separate a few issues. You don’t pay for Facebook or your page. Pages are free. Advertising on Facebook is separate and not a requirement for having a page. If you chose to advertise on Facebook, I would recommend firing your marketing guy. Because you gave $8,000 to a liberal organization that actively (and financially) fights against your beliefs… way to go. You just helped fund the “big company” that then gets to step on the little guy (yourself) as well as financed their ability to step on all our rights.
Honestly, didn’t it worry you that you were spending 8k on advertising with a company with whom you have no legal recourse or binding contract if they decide to shut your page down? They could change their TOS on a moments notice and boot every gun page. I honestly struggle to understand that reasoning.
Now let me be honest. I have never done any advertising without considering the ROI. My guess is you do the same. Would you have spent the 8k on Facebook if you didn’t think it would produce a financial return? Did you spend 8k on advertising and not see any return? I would empathize more if you spent 8k at one time and then they shut your page down. But, that obviously isn’t the case because that 8k helped you get to 27k visitors in your own words.
‘She Has the Right to Stay Home’: TheBlaze Readers Respond to S.E. Cupp’s CPAC Boycott
March 4, 2013 at 11:54am
@BOT
Marriage is a human religious institution. I don’t say that as a negative, just as a fact. There is no other species on the planet that practices marriage. You do have some some species that remain monogamous but that is only one aspect of what modern marriage encompasses. The Bible itself has numerous examples of non-monogamous marriage throughout the OT including the OT law for widows without children.
As a society that claims to be 70% Christian (we are lying to ourselves) marriage wouldn’t be devalued if removed from government as it is a covenant relationship with God. I would suggest that Christians have done a pretty good job at devaluing marriage as-is.
Correlation != Causation
“political revolutions that brought about societal collapse were preceded by a sexual revolution in which marriage and family were devalued”
Why do you think a society fell into sexual revolution in the first place? That statement could probably be better written as:
“political revolutions that brought about societal collapse were preceded by [God and following Jesus being] devalued”
Removing the special government benefits of marriage removes government control over an incredibly important religious institution. Getting government generally out of our personal lives (and especially our religious beliefs) is a really good thing.
‘She Has the Right to Stay Home’: TheBlaze Readers Respond to S.E. Cupp’s CPAC Boycott
March 4, 2013 at 9:38am
The heart of the problem is that marriage and so many other services relating to marriage (that are social / religious) have been adopted by the government. Why is gay “marriage” a problem.
1) Because it goes against our religious values. Yes it does, but that is why marriage should be a religious covenant and not a government institution. The moment it became a government institution it immediately watered down the spiritual meaning of it.
2) A good estate plan can cover the same legal concerns as marriage including visitor rights, beneficiaries, living wills, etc.
3) We tie all sorts of stuff to marriage like health insurance and then force employers to provide said coverage. How about insurance covers just yourself or insurance that covers you +1. That +1 could be your married spouse, parent, child, etc. Better yet, lets start to disassemble the insurance mess we have, implement tort reform, and allow multi-state competition.
What annoys me is that both liberals and conservatives what the government out of their lives on some issues but all up in someone else’s business on another issue. When you inflict your values on someone else, don’t be surprised when they do it right back.
My call to fellow Christians. You don’t want homosexual couples adopting. How about living up to James 1:27 and then maybe you will not have to worry about it. The adoption crisis and social security is only necessary because Christ followers have dropped the ball an