This photo captures Anthony Weiner’s reaction when asked, “Would you vote for a sexual predator for mayor of New York City?” He smiled and said, “Only if she’s cute.”
April 16, 2013 at 5:58pm
Hindus, mainly (and probably in this case). But still they believe that if this man’s wife and baby died, it is because they deserved it. Bad karma.
April 16, 2013 at 5:54pm
I lived in India for about a year and I’m not surprised at this story – as sad as it is. The predominant belief of Hinduism is the idea of Karma. So if this man’s family was killed in an accident, it must be because they (or he, or their family) messed up and they deserved to die. Not to mention the danger of stopping to help what might look like a tragedy, when it may be a setup for a car-jacking or worse.
Also this man may have been part of the “Untouchable” caste – in which case there is no reason for anybody to stop and help because his life is considered useless and disgusting. If his skin color is dark, then it would probably be considered that he was part of a lower caste.
This country needs Jesus.
December 27, 2012 at 9:35am
Pandering is not the point. It is that they went out of their way to be offensive towards Christian believers. I imagine you would be offended if someone walked by you with a “Lesbians Go To Hell” shirt on, wouldn’t you? Rightfully so. The hypocricy is that that it’s OK to be offended at Christian stuff like a prayer before a football game but when Christians are offended then they’re being ridiculous.
December 27, 2012 at 9:28am
Vaman, don’t you understand? It doesn’t matter if YOU don’t find it vulgar. All it takes is for one person to be offended and it has to stop right? I mean, if someone puts a cross on the top of their house or if a teacher puts the 10 commandments on their desk, then it has to be removed because there might be one student who would be offended by it.
But I guess it doesn’t matter if Christians find something offensive.
December 27, 2012 at 9:21am
It looks like atheists like to go bowling…
December 27, 2012 at 9:13am
Oh yeah? Well your brain is inherently flawed.
December 19, 2012 at 2:45pm
Maybe he was “rushin” home…
December 19, 2012 at 2:42pm
Obviously the driver couldn’t ‘steer’ his way out of this one…
So a scientist who believes in the Big Bang as far as the beginning of time has a problem with this theory because “The heat has to come from somewhere”…
Any comment on where the mass of the universe came from before the big bang?
July 27, 2012 at 4:02pm
Yeah. He believes in a loving, healing, forgiving God. He’s dangerous!
July 27, 2012 at 4:01pm
So I guess we should interview the CEOs and boards of director for every major company in the world and if any of them express an opinion that is contrary to the intolerant pagan Left, we should ban their company!
July 27, 2012 at 3:57pm
If this man couldn’t take the stress of handling a couple dozen loonies from making intolerant comments about Chick-Fil-A then he was in the wrong job. You all are disparaging this man’s character to suggest that he wasn’t capable of handling the ups and downs of his job.
I am hoping that this mans family sue the liberal politicans for causing his death with their stress-inducing comments.
Manslaughter charges are in order.
Bottom-line: Liberalism kills!
July 27, 2012 at 3:54pm
No seriously… Really? The progressive left caused this man’s death?
July 27, 2012 at 3:52pm
Right. There’s no possible way this man had any kind of a heart condition, history of heart disease in his family, was a smoker or ex-smoker, or any other common malady that would cause a heart attack. It just HAS to be the added stress to his job in the last 7 days. We need to arrest those people for murder!
July 27, 2012 at 3:49pm
Cue Rosanne Barr saying she’s glad someone from Chick-Fil-A died of a heart attack in 3….2….1….
June 21, 2012 at 4:30pm
Please stop pretending that this is what you use to keep your wife from finding out what you’ve been looking at on the internet. If you don’t want cookies saved on your computer, there are ways to do that. But Incognito or Private Browsing and the like… I’m telling you now, stay away from it. If any of you have teenagers, BELIEVE ME!!! Your kids are using this to hide the sites they’re going to
April 9, 2012 at 5:44pm
Oh yeah- that was from the “The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” government website…
April 9, 2012 at 5:43pm
Just found this:
“1. When is diabetes a disability under the ADA?
Diabetes is a disability when it substantially limits one or more of a person’s major life activities. Major life activities are basic activities that an average person can perform with little or no difficulty, such as eating or caring for oneself. Diabetes also is a disability when it causes side effects or complications that substantially limit a major life activity. Even if diabetes is not currently substantially limiting because it is controlled by diet, exercise, oral medication, and/or insulin, and there are no serious side effects, the condition may be a disability because it was substantially limiting in the past (i.e., before it was diagnosed and adequately treated). Finally, diabetes is a disability when it does not significantly affect a person’s everyday activities, but the employer treats the individual as if it does. For example, an employer may assume that a person is totally unable to work because he has diabetes. Under the ADA, the determination of whether an individual has a disability is made on a case-by-case basis.”
Sotomayor is unable to work because of her diabetes or her employer assumes she is unable to work. As her employer (or at least her salary-provider) I think she is incompetent, but it has nothing to do with her diabetes – just her liberal world-view.
Oh yeah- that was from the "The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" government website...
February 27, 2012 at 9:19am
“Did you just use a condom to protect yourself against unintended pregnancy, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections?”
Anybody else notice that they include “unintended pregnancies” as a sexually transmitted infection? Perhaps not directly – and maybe that wasn’t even their intent the way the sentence is structured. But I think it may be a glimpse at how many people in the “all abortions all the time” crowd view life in the womb: just an infection that can be cured by going to the doctor for a quick procedure.
Ever since contraception became acceptable to use by some faith communities and the secularists childbearing and pregnancy have been considered a disability and illness that can be avoided for the common good.
I don't think they intended pregnancy to be lumped in as an infection. They DID change Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) to STI though. They want people to lose the stigma surrounding STD's so they become more acceptable in the mainstream. Same way it went from Shell Shock to post traumatic stress disorder. Soften the language and take the cold hard facts out of it and leave only their agenda (it's just a little harmless sex) That is what they want to turn it into. Not something you should plan for, raise your children to respect. But something for sheeple to ignore so their deviancy becomes so common place they hope no-one will bat an eye at anything they do later. Face it, if PP had their way they would be introducing XXX material to pre-school kids as healthy and normal educational material. The filth they put on public display in their parades would have been more than enough to get them arrested a few years ago, but they have been actively eroding away at the nations morals.