User Profile: WhatsYerProblem

WhatsYerProblem

Member Since: July 21, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • May 31, 2013 at 6:21pm

    This photo captures Anthony Weiner’s reaction when asked, “Would you vote for a sexual predator for mayor of New York City?” He smiled and said, “Only if she’s cute.”

  • April 16, 2013 at 5:58pm

    Hindus, mainly (and probably in this case). But still they believe that if this man’s wife and baby died, it is because they deserved it. Bad karma.

  • April 16, 2013 at 5:54pm

    I lived in India for about a year and I’m not surprised at this story – as sad as it is. The predominant belief of Hinduism is the idea of Karma. So if this man’s family was killed in an accident, it must be because they (or he, or their family) messed up and they deserved to die. Not to mention the danger of stopping to help what might look like a tragedy, when it may be a setup for a car-jacking or worse.

    Also this man may have been part of the “Untouchable” caste – in which case there is no reason for anybody to stop and help because his life is considered useless and disgusting. If his skin color is dark, then it would probably be considered that he was part of a lower caste.

    This country needs Jesus.

  • December 27, 2012 at 9:35am

    Pandering is not the point. It is that they went out of their way to be offensive towards Christian believers. I imagine you would be offended if someone walked by you with a “Lesbians Go To Hell” shirt on, wouldn’t you? Rightfully so. The hypocricy is that that it’s OK to be offended at Christian stuff like a prayer before a football game but when Christians are offended then they’re being ridiculous.

  • December 27, 2012 at 9:28am

    Vaman, don’t you understand? It doesn’t matter if YOU don’t find it vulgar. All it takes is for one person to be offended and it has to stop right? I mean, if someone puts a cross on the top of their house or if a teacher puts the 10 commandments on their desk, then it has to be removed because there might be one student who would be offended by it.

    But I guess it doesn’t matter if Christians find something offensive.

  • December 27, 2012 at 9:21am

    It looks like atheists like to go bowling…

  • December 27, 2012 at 9:13am

    Oh yeah? Well your brain is inherently flawed.

  • December 19, 2012 at 2:45pm

    Maybe he was “rushin” home…

  • December 19, 2012 at 2:42pm

    Obviously the driver couldn’t ‘steer’ his way out of this one…

    Responses (1) +
  • August 21, 2012 at 2:14pm

    So a scientist who believes in the Big Bang as far as the beginning of time has a problem with this theory because “The heat has to come from somewhere”…
    Any comment on where the mass of the universe came from before the big bang?
    sheesh.

  • July 27, 2012 at 4:02pm

    Yeah. He believes in a loving, healing, forgiving God. He’s dangerous!

  • July 27, 2012 at 4:01pm

    So I guess we should interview the CEOs and boards of director for every major company in the world and if any of them express an opinion that is contrary to the intolerant pagan Left, we should ban their company!

  • July 27, 2012 at 3:57pm

    If this man couldn’t take the stress of handling a couple dozen loonies from making intolerant comments about Chick-Fil-A then he was in the wrong job. You all are disparaging this man’s character to suggest that he wasn’t capable of handling the ups and downs of his job.

    Get a grip people!

    Responses (1) +
  • July 27, 2012 at 3:54pm

    Really?

    Really?

    No seriously… Really? The progressive left caused this man’s death?

  • July 27, 2012 at 3:52pm

    Right. There’s no possible way this man had any kind of a heart condition, history of heart disease in his family, was a smoker or ex-smoker, or any other common malady that would cause a heart attack. It just HAS to be the added stress to his job in the last 7 days. We need to arrest those people for murder!

  • July 27, 2012 at 3:49pm

    Cue Rosanne Barr saying she’s glad someone from Chick-Fil-A died of a heart attack in 3….2….1….

  • June 21, 2012 at 4:30pm

    Please stop pretending that this is what you use to keep your wife from finding out what you’ve been looking at on the internet. If you don’t want cookies saved on your computer, there are ways to do that. But Incognito or Private Browsing and the like… I’m telling you now, stay away from it. If any of you have teenagers, BELIEVE ME!!! Your kids are using this to hide the sites they’re going to

  • April 9, 2012 at 5:44pm

    Oh yeah- that was from the “The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission” government website…

  • April 9, 2012 at 5:43pm

    Just found this:

    “1. When is diabetes a disability under the ADA?

    Diabetes is a disability when it substantially limits one or more of a person’s major life activities. Major life activities are basic activities that an average person can perform with little or no difficulty, such as eating or caring for oneself. Diabetes also is a disability when it causes side effects or complications that substantially limit a major life activity. Even if diabetes is not currently substantially limiting because it is controlled by diet, exercise, oral medication, and/or insulin, and there are no serious side effects, the condition may be a disability because it was substantially limiting in the past (i.e., before it was diagnosed and adequately treated). Finally, diabetes is a disability when it does not significantly affect a person’s everyday activities, but the employer treats the individual as if it does. For example, an employer may assume that a person is totally unable to work because he has diabetes. Under the ADA, the determination of whether an individual has a disability is made on a case-by-case basis.”

    Summary:
    Sotomayor is unable to work because of her diabetes or her employer assumes she is unable to work. As her employer (or at least her salary-provider) I think she is incompetent, but it has nothing to do with her diabetes – just her liberal world-view.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 27, 2012 at 9:19am

    “Did you just use a condom to protect yourself against unintended pregnancy, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections?”

    Anybody else notice that they include “unintended pregnancies” as a sexually transmitted infection? Perhaps not directly – and maybe that wasn’t even their intent the way the sentence is structured. But I think it may be a glimpse at how many people in the “all abortions all the time” crowd view life in the womb: just an infection that can be cured by going to the doctor for a quick procedure.

    Disgusting.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go