User Profile: Dethklok91


Member Since: October 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [4] April 16, 2015 at 4:34pm

    Kinda like those “Nationalsozialisten”, English for “National Socialists”.

    You know, the Nazis.

    Who were Socialists, by the way.

  • [5] April 16, 2015 at 3:21pm


    Do you understand what the idea of a “national socialist” is? This is not a “socialist”…it is a far right wing idea….”

    Yeah, Stamp. A “National Socialist” isn’t a “Socialist”. I mean, yeah, sure it has “Socialist” after the word “National”, but that still doesn’t make them a “Socialist”.

    Such is the thinking of our resident oxymoron. HEAVY emphasis on the “moron” part.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] April 16, 2015 at 3:00pm

    Depends on the situation, VoiceoftheLiberalSocialistMinority. If someone breaks into your house with a gun… Yyyyyyeah, you’re probably gonna need a gun to defend yourself. But, hey, you don’t wanna a gun, that’s your prerogative. Just don’t try to disarm others who want one.

    You know, like the Nazis did to the Jews.

    The very same Nazis who were Socialists.

    The ideology of which you’re affiliated with.

  • [6] April 16, 2015 at 2:51pm

    Uh, yes, Voice, they were. “Nazi” is short for “Nationalsozialistische”, which mean “National Socialist.” I know you don’t like knowing that you’re apart of the same ideology that the Nazis were, but facts are facts.

    Also, it doesn’t matter how they started out. The fact of the matter is, the “German thugs” had government authority to round all those Jews up and send them to Concentration Camps; you know, the ones where millions of them would die in. And like a typical Socialist (which the Nazis were), you want Republicans/Conservatives/Libertarians here in the U.S. to be stripped of their rights, so the government can have them.

    Much like the Nazis did.

  • [11] April 16, 2015 at 2:22pm

    Indeed they were, Voice. Thing is, however, those “Germans thugs” using those guns were government employees; they weren’t regular citizens. And yet, despite that, you’d want nothing more than for our government to disarm regular citizens, while THEY get to keep THEIR guns. But then again, you’re just a troll whose posts are simply meant to be inflammatory. I doubt even YOU believe the crap you spew.

    Also, fun fact: The Nazi’s who killed all those Jews were Socialists.

    Kinda like you.

    Responses (17) +
  • [57] April 7, 2015 at 1:53pm

    That’s what kinda confused me too. Was she forced to boycott Indiana, or something? She was the one who organized the event, so it seems to me she had the power to choose whether to go or not, which would mean this is an Anti-RFRA article. But she uses the term “opposition” in 3rd-person, like she wasn’t part of the aforementioned group. And if this is a Anti-RFRA article, why is it on TheBlaze instead of Huffington or other Left-leaning websites? I was under the impression that the writers on this website were Pro-Constitution (1st Amendment in this case). And that’s what the bill was supposed to advocate for, right? The right to practice one’s religion without Government interference?

  • [18] April 7, 2015 at 1:36pm

    Okay, I’m kinda confused. Did she choose to boycott Indiana, or was she forced to because of higher management (or something) who disagreed with the RFRA bill and decided to boycott Indiana? Because the article makes it sound like she had no say in it, yet she was the one who organized the event. However, if she did decide to boycott the state because of the bill, and is now reaping the consequences, then I can’t say I have any pity for her.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] April 4, 2015 at 3:30am

    Next time, she should see how many Barbara Walters’s interview tapes it’ll take to stop a .22.

  • [3] April 3, 2015 at 5:47pm

    Actually, I take that back.

    A more appropriate response would be: Better than Organization for Action Remedial School, WangDangDoodleSensei.

    You know, because you trolls are stupid. Especially CannedMeat. And Chuckles. And RedstarSocialist. And idiotsforidiocracy. And Bernie. I don’t think you guys ever finished middle school, did you. Or the 5th grade.

  • April 3, 2015 at 5:27pm

    “As for you Dethkok, I’ve looked at your other comments and well, I’m afraid you don’t quite reach the thresh hold of “worth my time.” Just a tad too devolved. Carry on, though.”

    And yet, you still responded to me, WangDangDoodleSensei. Didn’t you say Avengerk wasn’t “worth [your] time” as well, WangDangDoodleSensei? And didn’t you STILL keep responding to him, despite him not being “worth [your] time”, WangDangDoodleSensei?


  • [1] April 3, 2015 at 5:02pm

    Has anyone ever told you your English sucks?

    Is it even your first language?

    And I’m being somewhat serious. It’s awful. Like “peeling onions in front of my eyes” awful.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] April 3, 2015 at 4:44pm

    Kinda reminds you of yourself doesn’t it, Blackface? A White man trolling TheBlaze as a Black man.

  • [7] April 3, 2015 at 4:43pm

    Pretty racist comment there, Chuckles. Do you think he also works at an 7/11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts like your fellow idiot, Joe Biden, does?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 3, 2015 at 4:39pm

    Said the troll who voted for one. Twice.

    Makes you look pretty stupid, WangDangDoodleSensei.

  • [2] April 3, 2015 at 4:37pm

    Better than Organization for Action High School, WangDangDoodleSensei.

  • [1] April 3, 2015 at 4:31pm

    That you, WangDangDoodleSensei?

  • [3] April 3, 2015 at 11:50am

    Exactly! Even the Judge seems to believe that twisted logic.

    “But St. Joseph Superior Court Judge Elizabeth Hurley chastised the woman for not seeking a legal abortion and decried her ‘treatment of the child literally as a piece of trash,’ the Associated Press reported.”

    Isn’t that how babies are usually thought and treated as when the mother gets an abortion? As a “piece of trash”?

  • April 2, 2015 at 11:44pm

    Actually, zappatrolls, isn’t it discriminate against nudists?

  • [4] April 2, 2015 at 7:34pm

    Seriously? Was my previous post so “spooky”, that you had it removed, Parrot?


  • [1] April 2, 2015 at 7:27pm


    That doesn’t make any sense. To get into office, won’t those “evangelicals” have needed a majority vote? I don’t think they just waltzed into the Senator’s office, and- *POOF*- magically got the position. No, Mike Pence just needed a backbone, which, unfortunately, seems to be in short supply when it comes to the Republicans.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love