User Profile: Dethklok91


Member Since: October 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [9] September 27, 2015 at 10:22pm

    Of course she denies the videos’ authenticity, despite having not watched the videos. Wish TheBlaze would’ve mentioned that.

    “I don’t stipulate that these videos are real. And the fact is — and fact is that the research that is being criticized there is research that has been supported. now. I HAVEN’T SEEN — I’ve seen some news reports of it, but I also know that it’s not real and you can create any reality that you want.”

    Then again, this is the same… woman who infamously stated “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”, so it’s obvious she’s never going to watch the them. Wouldn’t want to run the risk of losing one of the Democrats’ cash cows.

  • [3] September 24, 2015 at 11:34am

    If she had told me that, I would’ve said, “Kinda like men being called ‘chauvinists’, right? It applies to both genders, yet men seem to be the only ones being called it. Sound pretty sexist to me.”.

  • [4] September 14, 2015 at 11:33am


    Yeah, you gotta love people like that, just. They think everything in life is free, but don’t seem to realize that SOMEONE has to pay for it. It’s like the people who complained about the Minnesota restaurant that added a “Minimum Wage Fee” to its customers’ receipts. Sure, they wanted minimum-wage workers to have a higher paying job but, like typical Progs, got mad when THEY had to pay for it.

    ******* parasites. Honestly, I don’t get people who think like that.

  • [4] August 27, 2015 at 4:43pm

    MaggotsWay was also on here several months ago, telling us that MALE pedophiles who molested MALE children weren’t gay. Just another one of the stupid trolls that infest this website. In fact, I believe it’s just one of many of Chuckles’s screen names.

  • [9] August 7, 2015 at 4:22am

    Meh. Kinda disappointed with Rand’s performance. And before anyone jumps on me, I agree 100% with everything he said. I just wish he was a bit more cordial. Yelling and talking over the other speaker is something I would expect from Christie; not the guy who was even able to shush a CNBC anchor. But like I said, I fully agree with Rand. Though, I do also wish Rand would’ve pointed out that even the FBI admitted to not thwarting a single act of terrorism with the Patriot Act.

    To further cement the claim, he should’ve then asked Christie why the Patriot Act is so needed to combat terrorism, if it wasn’t even able to stop the Boston Bomber.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] July 29, 2015 at 9:32pm

    “Gorton later said the post was supposed to be sarcastic.”

    How could his post had possibly been sarcastic? If he was trying to be ironic, he probably should’ve put an emoticon beside it, or made it blatantly ridiculous by using excessive amounts of exclamation marks.

  • July 29, 2015 at 12:30pm

    You guys do realize sylercider is just a retread troll trying to get you to respond to it so as to make money, right? If you’re going to respond to it, post your responses on NeoFan’s comment, not the troll’s.

    Don’t give it what it wants.

  • [2] July 29, 2015 at 1:27am

    Attention, Everyone. It seems one of our retread trolls has gotten another account.

    Member Since: July 29, 2015

    Please do the thinking world a courtesy and ignore it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [12] July 24, 2015 at 8:09pm

    God bless Crackpipe for being wrong all of the time.

  • [5] July 24, 2015 at 8:08pm

    God bless this effort to defund Planned Parenthood.

  • [8] July 24, 2015 at 8:06pm

    God bless Rand Paul and every effort that will be used to defund Planned Parenthood.

  • [6] July 24, 2015 at 8:03pm

    “God bless President Obama and all who defend women’s rights and freedom of choice.”

    How did I know you’d be bleating more of your “God Bless” (you know, that guy you don’t believe in, even though you keep on insisting you do for whatever reason) crap on yet ANOTHER abortion story, Crackpipe. Hasn’t the thought ever occurred to you, Crackpipe, that perhaps it’s getting just a TAD bit repetitive? Surely you have a more active imagination than using the same tactic over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over again.

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] July 24, 2015 at 7:55pm

    I believe Obama prefers the term “Preparation H”.

  • [14] July 24, 2015 at 7:44pm

    “He added, ‘I’ll talk policy and politics in a couple of days.’”

    Am I the only one who’s got a bad feeling about that statement? I mean, why would he need to? Does he actually plan on pushing for gun control?

    Of course, had it have been me, I would’ve simply said, “How would gun control have worked, if the theater’s policy already forbade anybody from carrying a gun into the building? Clearly, this guy didn’t care one iota for the law, and he was going to get a gun no matter what.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 24, 2015 at 3:01pm

    I see you’re still trying to twist semantics, VeryCobaltRat. As expected. Tell me, Cobalt, when you lose at board games, do you simply knock over the board and claim victory? Because that’s what it seems like you’re doing right now.

  • [3] July 24, 2015 at 2:23pm

    Humorous. VeryCobaltRat’s only defense was to try to twist the semantics for “mass shootings”. Well, CobaltRat, according to the ‘NationofChange’ website, a “mass shooting” is simply defined as “an incident involving multiple victims of gun violence”, though they admit that “there is no official set of criteria or definition for a mass shooting”. So, it would seem like Blacks are still ahead of Whites when it comes to mass shootings.

  • [2] July 20, 2015 at 1:44pm

    Don’t blame the woman. When I went to the Columbus Zoo last year, I had to put up a couple of stupid parents like the couple in the story. Kid was crying at the top of his/her voice, and the frickin’ parents were just standing around with their thumbs up their asses, like they couldn’t even hear them! God knows I wanted to say something, but since I try to avoid fights, I didn’t say anything.

  • [3] July 17, 2015 at 2:55pm

    Oh, it does, Barber. That’s why I’m not directly responding to it. zappatroll’s MO is simply to post an inflammatory response, wait an hour or so for people to respond to it, then respond individually to those posters in its typical essay-style posts.

    Its other MO is to deflect any criticism aimed at Obama by demanding the poster to say what THEY would do. Of course, when you throw the tactic back in the troll’s face, it tries to squirm its way out of it.

  • [4] July 17, 2015 at 2:31pm

    Wow, zappatrolls. Couldn’t get anyone (except Eric) to respond to your first posts, so now you post two more? Talk about desperate.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] July 17, 2015 at 2:07pm

    Sorry for the double posting, East. For whatever reason, the first one wouldn’t post right away, so I figured I’d return to the story and post a similar response, seeing as we can’t post the same response a second time. Well, wouldn’t you know it. The first response was posted.

    This website can be so screwy at times.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love