Gotta love Scottie. He confuses himself easily. It’s like watching someone who has his shoelaces from both shoes tied together and yet he continues to try to walk. I hope he runs (for nomination)…it’s amusing.
[-1] February 26, 2015 at 5:26pm
Hey Sean, keep drinking the kool aid, silly goose!
You too. Let me know how the other government promises have turned out. In 1912 they swore the income tax would never be a tax on wages just dividends, how'd that work out?
In the 1960's they said the new welfare would eliminate poverty in our time, has it?
In 1976 the new department of education was going to dramatically improve academic achievement among our children, how are they doing?
The new Department of Energy was going to reduce our dependency on foreign oil, they don't even tell that lie anymore.
You believe that government regulation is going to improve the Internet and service providers, what track record do you base that blind hope upon? Whose really drinking the Koolaid?
February 26, 2015 at 5:23pm
Actually, nothing has changed. Do you not read??
[-4] February 26, 2015 at 5:12pm
Yes, we did. And we will vote Hilary in, too. And you will continue to spew irrelevant nonsense to the other crazy beckies. Ain’t life predictable?!
silly? good hell just look at all the BS this administration has done… obumercare is a absolute lame joke regulation after regulation piece of junk! It has nothing to do with providing health care – he wont more forward with Key Stone the list goes on and on, if you think ANYTHING he has done is good then you are clearly brain-dead or a stinkin leftist drink the koolaid idiot who wont acknowledge the plain truth – the truth that obumer is the most lawless and incompetent President EVER! Its so plain a 4 year old can see this douche for who he really is...
February 26, 2015 at 5:07pm
You are the idiot…do explain how this removes freedom rather than protects it. I will wait patiently.
February 26, 2015 at 5:06pm
Royce, give up. They are beckbots. They don’t understand that it is EXACTLY the opposite of what they are saying.
 February 26, 2015 at 5:04pm
Do any of you understand that this is FOR THE PEOPLE and everyone WANTS THIS. It is the opposite of what is being said here…this is about keeping the internet FREE for everyone!!! Get off the blaze and get schooled…PLEASE!!!
P.S. In case you don’t know it and are listening to yet another republican spewing baloney, babies aren’t born from their mama’s belly.
Free? Really? Nothing is free unless you are taking from somebody that earned it.
It’s about keeping the internet free, really? So you’re saying it takes 317 pages to keep the internet as it is, are you blind? Have you read the bill? No, because it’s not available for you to read.
Name one area where the government has made things easier, cheaper, or better through legislation.
Even the name of the bill is a lie, the net is the most neutral thing we have because nothing is suppressed, yet. All it takes for the useful idiots to get behind anything is some variation on the word fairness or the promise that big (oil, retail, evil white guys, the rich, CEO’s or corporations) are going to get punished and you line up to support it.
They could take any freedom from you that they want as long as they promise you that someone else is going to suffer.
Hey Sean, keep drinking the kool aid, silly goose!
You are truly brilliant!!!
The entire purpose of this was to establish
Government Involvement in the ‘DELIVERY’ of the Internet. They don’t care about the content.
They can “TAX” the delivery and when they implement the regulations those corporations that provide the delivery will do what ever they want in the way of ‘NEUTRAL FILTERING’.
Its all about Taxing, and Control.
Now the FCC can begin mandating that certain ‘Internet Connected Devices’ must have this and that delivery services and software features.
I guess my great grand parents were decades ahead of us. They unplugged their TV when they weren’t watch it so keep the ‘Govment’ from seeing what you were doing.
From here on out, the Internet will become a two way conduit.
So you think service providers are your enemy? Hand control to the FCC so bandwidth is shared equally. All you fools who think that's better are the same idiots who watch porn videos all day or play Modern Warfare type first person shooters and believe equal bandwidth justice will work in their favor. You will be forced back to still pics or slow frame rates on your fancy over clocked I7 multi-processor overpriced machines. Suckers!!!!
First of all. You are a flat out lier. Simple as that.
The FACT that you said “everyone WANTS THIS”. And then “Get off the blaze and get schooled…PLEASE!!!” — Proves that ‘NOT’ EVERYONE is for this. — You are the same people that believed administration lies on the unfordable Health Care Act.
Put some skin in the game. Not talk. — You will see additional charges on your Internet bills just like energy, phone, cell, etc. — In the future. 100% guaranteed. –
Plus think about this. You are wanting a government identity to make judgement about the Internet, and providers. When it couldn’t even make a Health Care website work. And couldn’t even stay on budget. Plus the FCC do not have the qualifications or expertise to manage such a large scale operation without screwing ot up. They can’t even keep hackers from their own GV sites. — If anything the more the government interfaces with private/free enterprises. THE MORE THE Private/Free Enterprise and the GV gets compromised. Because it allows access to and from the Gv and Free Enterprise for the Hackers and sabotage groups to maneuver.
Even a 1st year student knows this.
 February 8, 2015 at 1:03pm
I am a liberal democrat and I find what Brian Williams did to be indefensible. So please stop saying that liberal democrats are okay with this — they are not.
February 6, 2015 at 3:00pm
Fathers walk away from their children every second of every day and we never hear about it. I disagree with your assessment.
Blow it out one of your lower orifices; You are nothing more than an ignorant left winger women's libber that would have to PAY a man to get them pregnant.
When expecting our first baby, the doctor offered to run the test for Down's syndrome and we BOTH total to shove it up a lower orifice because NO MATTER the outcome there would be NO Murderous Abortion.
Babies FEEL PAIN when they are killed in the womb, they ARE people and ARE alive.
So then it's perfectly fine for this woman to get off the hook of abandoning her child just because men do it all the time? In addition, we see it all the time about men ditching their kids! It's in tv-shows, mini series and even movies.
"men leave their children every second of the day"
Again, prove it.
 February 6, 2015 at 2:45pm
Many states have laws in place where ANYONE can bring a baby to a hospital and leave the baby there. It protects the baby from harm. I think it’s meant for people who are unstable or maybe for young teens who don’t know how to go through proper adoption channels. In any case, you could leave ANY baby with the hospital (downs or not) and in most states, this is legal for the protection of the baby.
[-1] February 6, 2015 at 2:40pm
Not in my opinion. You have your opinion; I gave mine.
 February 6, 2015 at 1:04pm
I am a liberal and I find what scrapadapolis said to be DISGUSTING. Don’t judge ME by what THAT person said. That person is a monster in my opinion!!
 February 6, 2015 at 12:57pm
I am a woman and I will be honest about the following: I would have had testing done (maybe they did and it was inconclusive) to make sure the baby didn’t have downs. I would have terminated at that early stage, BUT I could not walk away from that baby!! I don’t want comments about how that means I shouldn’t take the test, yada ya. I am being honest here. I don’t know think I know anyone (liberal or conservative) who could walk away from that baby. I would rather find out that this is a plan for the couple to deceptively get money from sympathizers — I would find THAT more palatable than anyone walking away from that baby!!
A dear friend of mine only learned that her daughter had downs at birth. The hospital staff urged her to put her up for adoption but she refused. Her husband walked out on her when she brought her home from the hospital. She raised her alone selflessly and courageously. She was burdened with many health conditions and operations. That little girl is now 22 years old and is a ray of sunshine in the lives of everyone she meets. Her mother considers it a blessing that she did not have the testing during pregnancy because she most likely would have aborted and the world would have missed out on something beautiful.
[-1] February 6, 2015 at 12:36pm
Love the way you speak for an entire nationality…ridiculous!
 February 6, 2015 at 12:35pm
I’m sure she will be forced to — as it should be!
February 6, 2015 at 12:33pm
Don’t turn this into some edict on women. It’s what ONE woman did. Just can’t stop with the misogyny, can you?? Find me one woman who thinks this was a good thing to do…good luck with that!
February 3, 2015 at 12:59pm
That could be said of all reporters.
[-2] February 3, 2015 at 11:58am
Yes and yet she caused Rand to become “frustrated”…not a good sign of coping skills or self-control for someone who wants to be president. What would happen if challenged by a real contender??
The interviewer is a supposed unbiased person. Anyone you would support is most likely unacceptable as president, too.
By the way Wow, Obama allows our borders to be over-run without any type of health checks. When my immigrant wife entered the US (legally), she was required to complete a series of health screening checks. Obama has opened the flood gates, and now we are seeing a series of epidemics from diseases that had been eradicated. Typical of the left. Cause a problem, then insist on new or expanded gov't programs to solve the problem they caused. Aren't you troubled by the lack of immigration control? By the way, it is the elite left who has always been at the forefront of arguing against vaccines.
You have a point, but keep in mind that the real contender will probably be Jeb Bush or Mike Huckabee. The Paul’s are constantly weeded out for the more safe ineffective contender. I am not saying that is what I would like to see, and I would like to keep my Senator Ted Cruz. But it would be hilarious if Cruz made the White House, I know some liberals that would denounce America due to that. :)