All S.E. Cupp “stories” are non-stories. Maybe if they keep talking about her she’ll be the political forces she thinks she is.
March 3, 2013 at 10:59pm
Real News isn’t very good, with or without S.E.
Really, the whole network has gone downhill very quickly since Obama’s re-election, including the radio show. I was a subscriber since the Insider Extreme days and I just recently dumped my subscription. Glenn seems to be going after a different audience, so… good luck to him.
February 12, 2013 at 12:52am
“The only history that repeats itself is the one that involves cults that tells their members that the world is going to end and they end up committing suicide.”
Like the cult in 1970′s San Francisco that became a roving voting-bloc for leftist-democrats like George Moscone, Dianne Feinstein, Harvey Milk and Willie Brown? Read up on your cults, sweetheart. If Jonestown repeats, you and your troll playmates may find yourselves in another People’s Temple with spiked cups of Flavor Aid in your hands.
February 12, 2013 at 12:31am
The Blaze is using John Guandolo’s past to discredit him. Beck and GBTV had no issue with John Guandolo’s past when they used him as a contributor on “Rumors of War”.
That’s the point.
Yes, Brennan is a mohammedan. That much is obvious. It’s actually more obvious with Brennan than it is with Obama, who seems to believe in his own divinity above all else.
February 11, 2013 at 11:30pm
And make no mistake: the typical Obama voter in the United States of Kardashistan doesn’t have the first clue or the slightest care who John Brennan is. They don’t consume news unless it accidentally crosses their eyes on their way to their celebrity gossip or sports scores. And they certainly don’t read, or even know of, The Blaze.
The trolls here represent the low end of the DC food chain… the twenty-something interns and aides working in the Beltway for bureaucrats and leftist think-tanks.
So, was GBTV aware of John Guandolo’s past indiscretions when it used him extensively in “Rumors of War III”? If so, why didn’t you or Mr. Beck feel the need to inform the audience of it before airing his comments?
And if his past indiscretions weren’t relevant to the opinions he was expressing in “Rumors of War III”, why are they relevant now?
John Guandolo is accusing Brennan of being a Muslim. And he is. That is the article. Stay on point would you?
Why is John Guandolo not relevant but Slick Willie is after being impeached. He then speaks at campaign rallies and gives advice to our standing president. I've seen both sides drool over his advice and believe every word he was saying like they were the words of George Washington. I've heard many, even on the right say Clinton knows his politics in and out, well we all know he is a liar in and out of office so why give him a platform to spew those lies.
The Blaze is using John Guandolo's past to discredit him. Beck and GBTV had no issue with John Guandolo's past when they used him as a contributor on "Rumors of War".
That's the point.
Yes, Brennan is a mohammedan. That much is obvious. It's actually more obvious with Brennan than it is with Obama, who seems to believe in his own divinity above all else.
February 11, 2013 at 9:14pm
At this point, the question isn’t whether Glenn Beck/The Blaze has gone to the dark side. It’s whether Beck was ever real in the first place.
Don’t trust the man, don’t trust his network, don’t trust his website.
February 5, 2013 at 12:49am
Oh, come on! It’s just the Rock-A-Fella symbol. Not to be confused with “Rockefeller”, like the one who wrote this:
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” — David Rockefeller, “Memoirs”, Page 405
February 5, 2013 at 12:07am
“It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am.
The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.” — George “Conspiracy Theorist” Washington, October 24, 1798
January 23, 2013 at 10:02pm
Five days ago, I didn’t give the official version of events a second thought.
Then I saw Robbie Parker. That big, dimpled smile as he approached the microphone was one of the most chilling things I’ve ever seen.
And Gene Rosen is an atrocious actor. It’s almost as though he’s being horrible on purpose.
This whole thing is creepy beyond belief. I can understand Beck wanting to avoid this, but this article is utterly pathetic.
January 23, 2013 at 9:38pm
Using Snopes is beyond weak. It’s desperate.
November 15, 2012 at 9:07pm
Tom Fontana is involved. That means that at some point, George Washington will be revealed as a closeted homosexual. Bank on it.
October 14, 2012 at 2:43am
“His theory is that moving elections from Tuesdays to weekends would increase voter turnout.”
Why would any sane American give a damn about increased voter turnout? How about we get ourselves an informed electorate that actually knows a little bit of how their government is supposed to function before we start herding bodies to the polls?
Oh, wait, I know… because an informed electorate would mean the effective death of the democrat party.
October 9, 2012 at 1:26am
Wow, this guy’s even more inane in print than he is on television. Then again, he spews five hundred words per minute when he speaks, so you usually only remember the very last idiotic thing he says.
October 6, 2012 at 11:19pm
October 2, 2012 at 11:06pm
Bummer. I was really hoping to have a Radiohead cover band on the front lines in the war for civilization, too
June 24, 2012 at 2:07pm
From Anders Breivik’s manifesto:
“It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian fundamentalist theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want). ”
“Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic.”
Yeah, that sure sounds like killing for Jesus.
June 4, 2012 at 6:03am
Hey look, the NWO’s very own Henny Penny is doing his madman-with-a-bullhorn schtick again!
I’m sure he’ll have a complete DVD box-set of his Bilderberg escapades for sale on his website in no time.And he’ll be promoting it relentlessly on Vlad Putin’s Russia Today, his favorite media outlet,freedom-loving patriot that he is.
He gives all of his films away for free and encourages his listeners to make copies and give the to everyone. SO money is obviously not the issue. Everyone of his films are free on Youtube. He sells them as well for people that want to help support the show. So how is that about profit. I have seen every film he has made and have never payed a cent. So peddle your bullcrap somewhere else.
May 21, 2012 at 7:30am
“CNBC’s Jim Cramer tells Carl Quintanilla that Facebook’s stock could go as high as $70 on the first day of trading, and if you already own it you should “sell, sell, sell.”
The story’s been removed. But he did get the “sell, sell, sell” part right.
May 21, 2012 at 2:40am
Is this the same Jim Cramer who was screaming that the Failbook IPO was going to $70 on the first day, then had the article scrubbed from CNBC’s site before the closing bell on Friday? That Jim Cramer?
Europe is certainly screwed, but really, this guy needs to stay out of the prediction game. He’s worse than Bill Kristol.
I watched Cramer all last week and he was down on FB the entire week. He has been telling people not to buy because there are too many unknowns and too many red flags surrounding the company. I don't know where you heard him say $70, but it wasn't his TV show.
CNBC could have printed something, but pulled it because they used his name without his actually saying it. CNBC telling a lie to boost interest in one of their liberal allied companies (FB) would be more reasonable.
"CNBC's Jim Cramer tells Carl Quintanilla that Facebook's stock could go as high as $70 on the first day of trading, and if you already own it you should "sell, sell, sell."
The story's been removed. But he did get the "sell, sell, sell" part right.