There is no need to get snarky just because they don’t play your beloved AC/DC on AM anymore.
 February 5, 2016 at 9:26am
If everything is is relative, what is right? What is moral for you may be immoral to me. And who are you to dictate what is moral in my world?
You are in a circular argument that you cannot escape without concluding that morals are meaningless, without a supreme lawgiver.
February 4, 2016 at 5:37pm
Along with the psychiatrist , I would recommend a speech therapist and remedial rhetoric.
[-1] February 4, 2016 at 5:24pm
Trump is a liar and an opportunist….now there are two.
February 4, 2016 at 5:18pm
I am surprised to see him…I thought he had graduated to the fast food service industry.
February 2, 2016 at 5:28pm
Hmmm…still trust polls?
 February 2, 2016 at 5:18pm
New Hampshire, or as it is now known (New Massachusetts) has changed dramatically since the invasion of the Boston and 495 ring crowd. The Flatlanders are attracted the absence of sales and income taxes, but are less inclined to assimilate to the original Yankee culture. What was once a deep red state is now vacillates between purple and blue.
Just as significantly, NH has turned into the second most un-religious state in the US, with Sander’s Vermont taking the top billing. In fact all five New England states are in the top ten most pagan states in the Union. Little surprise that they are offended by Cruz’s display of faith.
 February 2, 2016 at 5:09pm
Oh dear, having acid flashbacks again?
 February 1, 2016 at 4:49pm
“Professing to be wise , they became fools and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for the image of corruptible man.”
 February 1, 2016 at 4:46pm
Oh you mean don’t stand by your convictions., hide them til after the election when its too late….like every faux Conservative.
Sound strategy if Carson only cared about winning.
 January 28, 2016 at 2:02pm
Martin Van Buren=Lawyer
John Quincy Adams=Lawyer
William Howard Taft= Lawyer
Just for the record.
January 28, 2016 at 1:46pm
You don’t get it. These debates should be for us, not the candidates. This is OUR time, not their’s, not the media’s, not the pundit’s, not the WWF watchers, for us , the conservative voter who has been marginalized and betrayed.
The debates are not debates, they are media advertising events. I want substantive debate and comparative revelation of each candidate’s policy addressing all of the pressing issues that will make or break this country in the next decade. I want details not fluff and rhetoric.
Frankly, Carson is the man with the most trustworthy character and a man of conscience who emulates Roosevelt’s adage, “Speak softly but carry a big stick”. He has been seriously underestimated, and part of that is his own fault for not cultivating the rage of this instant gratification generation.
So if enough knuckle-draggers can’t recognize Carson’s value, then I have to look for alternatives. I need to discover who comes closest to Carson. For that I do investigate candidate webpages, but I also need to see them think on their feet and reveal their true selfs under the pressure of cameras and jousting.
So yeah, I want more debates, but I want Lincoln-Douglas debates, which we have not been permitted to see. I don’t play well with the crowd or conventional wisdom. I don’t want a candidate to win, I want my country to win, I want my kids and grandkids to have a country again not a soundbite.
January 28, 2016 at 1:25pm
WS Brown- these blog sites are your factual references???????
This is how you make decisions????????
January 28, 2016 at 1:20pm
Ahhh, they are early starting with the Allen’s Coffee Brandy at the trailer park.
 January 28, 2016 at 1:14pm
You have to have a vote to lose or win a state in a primary. Last I checked the Texas primary was on March 1st. Or are you prescient?
Out of interest, which Canadian multinationals? I would be very interested in those citations.
Because facts are stubborn things.
January 28, 2016 at 12:25pm
Oh…. ad hominem attacks? How quaint. Must be a Trumpie.
A walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
When you learn the definition of ad hominem come back and comment appropriately.
January 28, 2016 at 12:18pm
Somebody should remind the Duck that Cruz is too.
January 28, 2016 at 12:16pm
Please cite which article of the Constitution disqualifies a candidate from the Presidency if they participate in an unsanctioned RNC debate? Can’t find one? How about a CFR citation, I’ll accept that. NO? How about a local zoning ordinance? Out of luck?
When did Trump or any Trumpie genuflect to any rule or ordinance of the RNC? Isn’t there some provision in the RNC rules requiring candidates participating in an RNC sanctioned debate to run as a Republican and not as an Independant if not nominated?
Circular logic isn’t.