Do that many actually watch - or is the TV on to make a noise in the background.
No bull, I've never watched it one time in my life....in fact the two cable channels that''s I 've had over the years DIDN'T have it.....lucky me, I might have cancelled cable
Yeah but the youtube video has 300k hits and you don't win votes by holding anachronistic views in regards to public safety/health
 January 31, 2015 at 8:36am
I’m not a lawyer, but isn’t this inciting violence?
Apparently, It's not considered violence if you're the right kind of target.
Hell yes it is!
Inciting violence....as opposed to the constant threat of violence or the application of violence. Y'all have conceded the monopoly of violence to the state. Others do not. When you allow the state to have a monopoly of violence then there is no liberty. Our law enforcement officials do NOT uphold the constitution. There are countless examples of this...particularly around the 4th, 5th, 2nd, 1st amendments.
So if they won't defend liberty and act on behalf of the state and those that fund them. Then why would you ever give that party a monopoly of violence? It's as though y'all have taken some sort of masochist role in the relationship and are terrified that someone might stop the sadist from working you over.
We are not meant to idolize police. We certainly aren't supposed to be afraid of them either. When the people fear their government we have tyranny. When the government fears the people we have liberty.
How exactly is a government supposed to fear the people if even the concept of resistance is shouted down by the masses of sheep?
It is very legal for liberals to do and say what they want. But not for the Tea Party terrorist.
Where i am coming from, our government has been “inciting violence” all around the world for decades.
Now if we are going to use the ‘inciting violence’ tool, we should apply it consistently…..
Inciting violence? Am i back im Egypt or something
I would hope it's not considered inciting violence. People frequently use such speech to convey frustrations. The same happens here in the comments all the time and it's obviously not their intent to incite anything.
This is another case where any law used against them could very easily be used against just about anyone. Is it distasteful? Sure. But distasteful speech is still protected, as it should be.
January 14, 2015 at 3:37pm
Million Dollar Baby, saddest movie ever.
 January 12, 2015 at 9:16pm
What CNN is rhymes with boosie and wussie and it means the same thing as a synonym of a cat but it’s the more offensive version of same.
CNN should collectively step out in front of a bus and do the world a solid.
 January 3, 2015 at 10:25am
Here is the reality.
In spite of the majority that don’t want ***** as Speaker, the Speaker is extraordinarily powerful and can end almost any Congressmans career by not appointing any challenger, or supporter of a challenger to any committees. To not be on any committee is to be irrelevant.
Then, the Speaker can shut off the campaign finance spigot to those that oppose him. It is nearly impossible to run an effective campaign without massive amounts of cash from Wall Street who the Speaker serves as puppet.
These are the same political games that have been going on for thousands of years.
Ever wonder why Caesar was stabbed by everyone in the Senate? It had to be unanimous or those that would have stood up alone would have been destroyed by the PTB.
Unfortunately, the leaders that we would choose are popular precisely because they are not wedded to Wall Street, therefore they have no power to fund the power base that would re elect them back into power.
It sucks. But that’s the way the world works.
November 12, 2014 at 9:45am
Because Norway has very few “teens”.
 November 12, 2014 at 9:21am
Yup. Definitely Der Fuhrer.
Keep in mind that Hitler eventually ordered the image of Christ to be replaced with his own.
Seems to me to be a reluctant artist including Hitler but subtly putting him down at the same time.
I wouldn't count on it. Christie told Hannity that he thought New Jersey had it right in terms of gun laws.
You might be right. He recently refused to sign even more restrictive gun legislation but that kind of thing will cost him some support among the limp-wristed liberals who are only comfortable with power if the government is using it.
 August 4, 2014 at 8:44am
Best bet in all of sports is to bet against Chokio on Sunday when he starts the day with a lead.
 August 3, 2014 at 1:13pm
If I recall correctly, Beck quoted Obama’s book where Obama stated that “if he could expunge the white blood from his body, he would.”
Now, if any white person exclaimed that they would, if they could, expunge any black blood from their body, the media would rightly call such an individual a racist.
With reasoning like that you are going to do some serious brain damage to the Liberal trolls who frequent this site...keep up the good work!
In my opinion, anyone with Glenn's power of radio and or web listening/viewing population shouldn't be afraid of telling the truth; no matter the possible repercussions.
Got any context there or you just think that's meaningful in a vacuum?
there you go = being all LOGICAL and using FACTS and stuff
beck's head can't take that much reality, lets not forget he gives money to a cult church that thinks the bible was wrong and the occult freemason pagan idiot joseph smith's made up religion is the right one! roflao
oh and he made sure and tell the whole world that freemasons are not the bad guys ===> yet they are making a pledge to satan!!
Actually, that quote comes comes from Malcom X, not Obama. Here is the paragraph from Obama's book:
"As I imagined myself following Malcolm X’s call, one line in his book stayed me. He spoke of his wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged. I knew that, for Malcolm, that wish would never be incidental. I knew as well that respect for my own white blood would never recede into mere abstraction."
He is actually saying that he would never disrespect his white blood.
Don't mistake me for an Obummer supporter, I am a historian and I disagree with any side of the spectrum creating lies to benefit their story. There is enough shit on Obama, that we don't need to make up lies to support our anti-progressive ideology. The left do this all the time, they make up lies and people believe them. If conservatives are to put a good name on themselves, we too need to stop creating lies to support our agenda.
I myself, do not believe Obama is racist. I believe calling Obummer racist, is just as bad as lib-tards calling us racist any chance they get.
If you're going to be against something, it's best to study up on what exactly you're against. Reading Obama's books is a good place to start instead of just believing Genn. I know Glenn is trying real hard but he is not free from creating lies to support his beliefs, which is why I stopped listening to him.
 July 16, 2014 at 11:33pm
By the way, since Obama took over, air travel in the US has plummeted. Airlines are making more by canceling routes and increasing seating capacity on remaining flights.
Shut up you moron.
 July 16, 2014 at 11:28pm
You are obviously smarter than I.
Help me out. At what temperature does a contrail form? What humidity?
I understand that it’s pretty damn cold all the time and pretty damn zero humidity at 40,000 feet.
But I’m just a loon.
Show me your data about high altitude temperature fluctuations and humidity changes from minute to minute.