i cannot stand the monk or other ppl that trash GB. He supports the best candidate in the race ever election but that isnt good enough for ppl like the monk. God forbid glenn support romney over obama where there was no other option. you sicken me. Fake conservative livertarian. Just run to a progressive candidate at ur first chance monk. You show the yourself to be the progressive scumb that you are.
Try being helpful and then have that helpfulness ripped out from under you.
And learn to spell. Seriously. It really sucks. Did you actually graduate from 6th or 8th grade?
You asked for it so you got it. : (
Seriously? Glenn pushes Rubio the guy who’s basically for open borders and you’re calling Monk progressive scum? Glenn pushed Romney in the last presidential election and his healthcare policy was Obamacare light. Read between the lines man, Glenn always plays the right till the end of an election cycle, then picks the biggest progressive with an R next to their name when it’s all said and done. You are being played. Not that a good candidate will win anyway. Our elections are a joke especially when politicians in power can just redistrict to make the election results favor their side. There is really no such thing as freedom in this country. It's all a charade at this point.
If you came here just to be Glenn's groupie then you're here for the wrong reasons. Remember "question with boldness and speak without fear?" Are we not supposed to apply that standard to Glenn himself? Didn't he outright say that we are? If I believe in my heart that he is wrong then I am not going to hold back on him. He should applaud that if he still means what he once said.
Conservative Beck? What happened to libertarian Beck? Anyway Beck fails. The word must have gone out. Push Rubio.
I am no Glenn Beck apologist but what may have shifted him away from libertarianism could have been the manner in which the Pauls applied it.
We all stay up nights worrying that you might not like us.
STAY CALM and ULTRA, Glenn was never a Libertarian.
 November 9, 2015 at 11:52am
So the president of the University is responsible for what some racist students do. If called freedom of speech on a public campus. The president would be out of line to punish the students for their speech. No matter how much we disagree with it.
November 9, 2015 at 11:47am
I dont have any problems chrome ftw
 October 12, 2015 at 9:05pm
He loves himself too much to be a muslim. He thinks he is god.
 October 5, 2015 at 2:56pm
Ignoring culture and giving it up to the left is how we lost this country. So I’m glad the blaze does stories like this. We should start caring so our ideology reaches more people.
Culture is what you find in a petri dish. But seriously, even those who seem to have the means to affect culture will opt for a crass commercialism instead. I’m always taken aback by the fundamental difference in something like FOX news and the programming found on the other FOX outlets. Are these two different branches of a multi-media conglomerate, where one hand doesn’t know what the other is doing? It seems like the kind of "culture" that the people at FOX news deplore is the kind that on FOX, FX, FXX, etc., thrives.
 October 3, 2015 at 4:44pm
Blaze, stop using his name please. Just refer to him as the murderer please.
Infamy is what he wanted, and unfortunately it's what he's getting.
Well then someone might confuse him with Cheney.
 October 3, 2015 at 4:41pm
Really? If your family was receiving treatment there and badguys started shooting from the building you would want us to bomb the building? Surely there is a better solution. Something more pinpoint could have been done. It’s still early but this looks like a terrible mistake.
 September 30, 2015 at 11:29am
The comment from the owner of the waffle house was backing up the employee….
 September 29, 2015 at 9:51am
An MLB stadium is considerably louder than a tball field.
[-1] August 31, 2015 at 8:13pm
 August 31, 2015 at 7:59pm
Shouldnt matter. It’s a public space. They have said, “arrest us for using the first amendment in a public space”.
Arrested for stupidity or laziness?
The administrator told them the procedure, so either they don't understand simple instructions or it is too much effort for them to do what everyone else has to do to distribute materials on campus...
LibSocPuppet, Wow, permission must be granted in writing to practice free speech? Sort of means that they can be denied as well.
No one's free speech is being infringed upon unless they were denied the ability to speak...they were merely asked to go through the proper procedure to become a recognized student group to show they belonged on campus...
...do you know what kind of chaos it would be if anyone could go on a campus and just start to hand out any nonsense they wanted?
The first ammendment doesn't apply unless it supports the progressive liberal ideology. Especially in the cesspools that are today's public schools.
In one way, I agree that they should have went through the right channels because they had signs. The first couple weeks of school, all kinds of groups have their little tables out there.
But, I disagree on the idea of free speech being regulated...overly, in this case.
I'm an adult student and see drug dealers all over campus & smell pot on them in the classes. Nobody EVER confronts them. I believe that is a much more detrimental issue than promoting the U.S. Constitution.
LS; Your either missing the point or ignoring it. It isn't that they need to register, though many are concerned over that, it is how she characterized it. "This is a public space, but within our confines we are allowed to choose what can be here.." That implies more than a simple process, but evaluation. The process should be simply informing whomever that; calls for violence, uncivil behavior, or vulgarity is not (always) considered free speech. Hand them the form and off they go. But three days? They're not selling automatic weapons, but espousing the basis for the freedoms we all should be enjoying. By the way, do you have a permit to post here? (yes, in essence we all do) Did it take three days? Was there a value judgment on what you might say because of your affiliations? And wouldn't it have made you angry if the wouldn't let you post because of the screen name or avatar you chose? Get the point now?
They will be allowed to exercise their Constitutional rights...
IF they are approved by the college (which is not the same as being guaranteed them by the Constitution), and...
IF the wait at least three days. "No, you may not exercise your Constitutional rights until after you receive permission following an approved waiting period."
Sorry, but the college is NOT giving them the right to exercise their Constitutional rights: the college is giving them permission -- which means they can also deny them permission -- to exercise their rights.
In plain English, they don't have any rights; they just have permission -- for now.
Freedom delayed is freedom denied.
WOW,Honesty before truth.
That is about the best reasoned statement I have read on here for a while.
Thank you, I was confused before I read what you wrote...no longer.TYVM
Even at a PUBLIC university, the institution has a right to regulate who is on their property. So, if you’re not approved to be there (student group or prior permission from the administration), you are trespassing.
Free speech does not permit intrusion where you are not invited. This is why many protesters are careful to remain on land that is in the “public domain” or at the very least not on the property of the place they are protesting. Cops can’t do squat to a peaceful assembly so long as it is not on private property without permission and not physically impeding the flow of traffic in and out of the business.
This only becomes a story if and when the university DENIES them permission to do this on their property or tries to have them arrested for doing it in the public domain. Right now, the university is well within its legal rights.
A libertarian student group that doesn't respect private property rights? Sure the school is being ridiculous but it's their property, same applies for CC.
I wonder if they keep the preacher who screams at passing students out. My alma matter never did.
There is no such thing as a "libertarian socialist" so I guess the person who goes by that alias is simply a socialist. He/she/it certainly sounds like one. No, you silly person, "right" means "you do NOT have to get permission from the government first". If you have to ask permission, that is called a "privilege" -- and it is NOT the Bill of Privileges.
Yes, there are plenty of government agencies that pretend they are allowed to force you to get permission first. But just because many government agents spit on the Constitution does not make that legal.
/This is what I'm hearing;
On public property, owned by the people, shall have a government employee or board dictate who and who cannot perform any speech on a public sidewalk or area.
Hm.....I've heard of towns having the same language; "you must have approval in order to march or walk upon the sidewalks in a protest. There will be a fee associated with the processing of your request." - all of which where revealed to be ILLEGAL laws. Free speech is just that; if you have a body of government employees that "approve" speech, then it's not free.
To LibertarianSocialist, wouldn't that apply also to all the illegal aliens entering our country? Or how about voter ID laws? Or IRS handling of conservative groups seeking non-profit status? Or sanctuary cities? etc etc etc.
[-1] August 25, 2015 at 9:49pm
“They don’t realize how the grassroots have abandoned them”. It’s the other way around Frank.
This still isnt an excuse for us to vote for a progressive because he speaks his mind though. Come on people.
 August 25, 2015 at 6:03pm
Nah Beck didnt like progressives then and he doesnt now either. Trump is just exposing those of you that are progressives cloaked in the freedom movement.
 August 25, 2015 at 6:01pm
Hard questions were asked to them all but Trump is obviously the one with thin skin.
So we should take in anyone on this planet who might get killed or threatened by the government they were born into? We don't have the room or the money to pay for it. I would give them money to buy weapons though.
 August 21, 2015 at 3:07pm
Nah i see hate. People are dont give a **** about Christians being slaughtered as long as its over the ocean somewhere else. Lots of people also misunderstanding as well thinking Glenn wants to walk illegals over the border…
 August 21, 2015 at 3:01pm
These are people are being refused entry by this administration because they are Christians. He wants to walk them into the country to get them away from ISIS. Also a jab at Obama for how open our borders are. If that’s crazy then i guess you can count me crazy.
yogy, don't we have enough problems with "people" walking across the border without Beck adding to it? DLV is correct, give them temporary asylum, find out who they truly are, THEN left the apply for full asylum.
Wrong border try this one almost no one watching it hell i even know a building that could temporarily hold some of them hey we are bringing thousands of muslims over here why not Christians
Can anyone cite the exact policy or instances of when these people have been denied entry?
Are they being denied entry because they are Christian? Beck and Moore make the claim, but offer nothing to support it.
When it comes to the lives of people asking to come in because they are going to be beheaded.. Glenn is acting saintly and I will be with him in the matter. It can be temporary or permanently, I don't care..
At this point if they can show they are Christians from a region under threat from ISIS, I'd say that's sufficient proof.
Hint, if the men aren't circumcised, we can infer they're likely not Muslim.
I too would like to see the rationale for refusing them entry.
 August 12, 2015 at 10:32pm
never had a problem on theblaze, but then again im in my 20′s and know how computers work…
I dont understand how supposedly conservative/libertarian commenters here are fully behind the leftist Trump. The guy likes single payer !!!!!! Constantly flip flops on the issues, doesn’t have a humble bone in his body, and this is the guy that will bring sanity back to the country in your mind….
Last time we were told to vote for Romney, even though he was for the same sort of thing as this.
 June 14, 2015 at 10:54pm
I’m tired of these morons questioning whether an officer could have used mace or a stun gun after an obviously good shoot. This is the kind of crap that happens when a country forgets how to think for itself.
Here's a thought - don't bum-rush an officer and attack him with a deadly weapon, and maybe, just maybe you won't get yourself a new set of airways!
I don't care if you're drunk or not - you're still responsible to NOT attempt to kill other humans.. assuming there's nothing more to the story, that officer was fully justified.
You ever think that the officer that now has to live with killing this man for the rest of his life, might have a different viewpoint than a bunch of billy bada$$ armchair quarterbacks BS'ing on a website?
That is why I advocated for him using his tazer in my post below...not out of any love for lowlife perps that attack officers.
I thought the job of police was to resolve any situation with the least amount of force possible.
Deadly force should never be the go to.
Let’s see… man comes after you to hit, beat, and possibly kill you with a blunt object. You tell him repeatedly to put the blunt object down. He doesn’t listen to you. Then he gets shot. Sad the man was killed, but I see no issue here for the LEO.
Lessons here... listen to what LEO's tell you to do, don't attack them, and act in a civilized and respectable manner.
Hey, he was unarmed they will say. Yeah, a huge club.