User Profile: zapparules

zapparules

Member Since: September 24, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [-1] March 29, 2015 at 2:34am

    Redline29: “Should you be forced into doing something you do not believe in?”

    Did you think of that one all by yourself?
    You might want / need to read your own statement over and over to yourself a few times but… My guess is you might finally grasp the utter ignorance of that statement.

    Fill in the blanks Redline29
    I do not believe in _____________
    Yet I am required to ______________ – so I can live I society.

  • March 29, 2015 at 2:27am

    Marnin: “I don’t understand why he is suddenly “embattled” or why everyone is calling the law “controversial”.
    WHY?
    Because while Pence tried to hide the activation of this Act, it had to ultimately be reveled to the public and now that it has… The majority realizes the utter failure – codification of intolerance and discrimination – allowed by the act.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-4] March 29, 2015 at 2:21am

    So being gay is like being a Nazi – eh 13th Imam?

  • [1] March 29, 2015 at 2:19am

    quicksdraw
    Can you cite the real world cases where any gay or gays have ‘sued them into poverty’?
    Thanks

    Responses (1) +
  • March 29, 2015 at 2:18am

    BRILLIANT rebuttal TheGrtDcptn!

  • [-1] March 29, 2015 at 2:12am

    Proverbs
    I have never met a person like you in ‘real’ life. Someone who I knew by name or… ‘in-person’ experience.
    Do you really exist in the world outside of the anonymous (Blaze) blog-o-sphere?
    Does anyone in the ‘outside’ world – who knows your real given name – hear you speak with such consistent…
    Disdain for that which you are so obviously ignorant of?
    Seriously.
    I can’t think of a single human I have ever met from who I have heard so much… IGNORANCE – who then was able to actually function in the real world.

    EVERY person I have ever known in my life that was even remotely ‘capable’ of spewing but a Fraction of the ignorance you Proverbs do on a daily basis has either…
    Become aware of their utterly anti-social behavior and reconnected with reality – OR…
    Gone on to take their ‘show on the road’. As in… The road to nowhere. As in…
    Time to see if your act plays in the big tent.

    You Proverbs are but a dying breed.
    A relic of hatred, ignorance and intolerance.

    Your greatest achievement in life may well be the anonymous motivating to victory of the very people and beliefs you are so challenged by.

    And for that I thank you.

  • March 29, 2015 at 1:45am

    brigott

    In 1500 characters or less…
    Please properly represent this law to us if you can.
    Thank you.

    (Actually… Feel free to take as many characters as you wish.)

  • [-5] March 29, 2015 at 1:39am

    Kind of reminds me of a song…

    “Setting me up just to knock-a knock-a knock-a me down
    Down, down, down
    I’m going down, down, down, down
    I’m going down, down, down, down
    I’m going down, down, down, down”

    This ACT is going down.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] March 28, 2015 at 7:29pm

    Sarsfield1650
    You sound a little bitter.
    I guess I might be upset if my intolerance was being attacked / sought to be legally reduced.

    So Sarsfield1650
    When that business is one where there is not another ‘local one near by… When that service becomes potentially life or death…
    Then will you stand by as you or your loved one is discriminated against / service refused?
    This is about FAR MORE than cakes and pictures.
    What’s to stop someone from refusing life-saving services on the grounds that such goes against their religious expression freedoms?
    ‘Oh. You’re a Muslim in a bad car wreak. Too bad. I don’t ‘sell’ my life-saving services to Muslims. You’ll have to wait for the next doctor to see you.’
    ‘Oh. You’re a Christian in a bad car wreak. Too bad. I don’t ‘sell’ my life-saving services to Christians . You’ll have to wait for the next doctor to see you. IF you last that long. Good luck.’

  • [1] March 28, 2015 at 7:09pm

    Tanker135mechanic
    Curious. How does one KNOW when it is a gay (or other sinner) that is seeking to be a customer of theirs?
    In other words… How many other sinners are you / these other businesses / people actually doing business with without ever knowing it / caring about it?
    You all are but HUGE hypocrites when it comes to this matter.

  • [1] March 28, 2015 at 7:06pm

    Tanker135mechanic: “I see you have to twist words in order to make your point.”
    After just having seen your post to me… Now that is funny!

    Twisting my words to TRY and suggest that I “think beheading someone for not accepting Muslim law is the same as declining to take someone’s business”

    Twisting my words to TRY and content that I said limited govt was THE core conservative principle.

    “tell me how a gay couple is damaged by having to go to a nonChristian bakery”
    THE PRINCIPLE of it all is FAR MORE reaching than just the ‘damage’ done to a gay couple or person being denied service at a particular business.
    THAT you and others don’t realize that IS THE core of the differences here on this matter.

    So let’s say one refuses to give medical treatment to a gay on the grounds of ‘religious expression’…
    Then what kind of ‘damage’ might result from that?
    Say there is only a single provider of a certain business in an area and they refuse service to a gay – or to ANYONE (based on religious expression)…
    Then what kind of ‘damage’ might result from that?

    You think this is just about cakes and pictures???
    You couldn’t be more ignorant – AND wrong.

    “I am inconvenienced when the store I want to buy from doesn’t take American Express – but do I cry discrimination?”
    Why is that not discrimination? (I can’t believe I even need to explain this._
    BECAUSE such applies to ALL customers! That’s why.
    Get it?
    Obviously not.

  • [1] March 28, 2015 at 6:56pm

    Tanker135mechanic: “You are saying you think beheading someone for not accepting Muslim law is the same as declining to take someone’s business”
    NO. YOU are saying that. I said nothing of the sort.

    No wonder YOU think such discrimination is ONLY “hurting their feelings”.

    “Big govt” is whenever ANY level of govt grows large(r) for unnecessary reasons. At least that’s how I view it. You?

    “We say, clarifying what is the primary rights of the citizens of Indiana so that lower court activist judges do not trample on the rights of a very large group of people”
    Of course YOU say that.
    If a judge rules in favor of what you agree with…
    Constitutionalist judge
    If a judge rules against what you agree with…
    Activist judge.
    Interesting how it always works that way for some of you folks.

    Sorry but a FAR larger percentage of people agree with / support that SUPPOSED gay agenda.

    Do some of you just like the visualization of something being ‘forced down your throats’?

    “because a couple of lesbians…”
    No. Because of market forces.
    And doesn’t the right ALWAYS support market forces?
    Oh yea. ONLY when such go in favor of what you believe. Like those judges.

    I did NOT say “the core conservative principle” – ‘THE …’
    I said: “a core conservative principle” – ‘A …’
    Notice the difference there?
    Apparently not.

    So are you gonna argue that limited govt is NOT A core conservative principle???

  • [1] March 28, 2015 at 6:43pm

    monkE
    You mean “conservative principle”?
    I see.
    Indeed.

  • [-2] March 28, 2015 at 6:24pm

    This Act WILL BE retracted.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-3] March 28, 2015 at 6:21pm

    These scumbags should be held FULLY accountable.

    Have to ask though…
    Why ZERO reporting here at TheBlaze on the story of Floyd Dent? The black fella stopped (and beaten) by (all white) police in Inkster MI.

    This story is of three black males – scumbags who beat a man.
    The Dent story is of self-proclaimed “Robocop” beating a black man where… The charges of his fleeing and resisting arrest have been dismissed and he is also claiming the police planted drugs in his car.
    So here is a story of (white) police authorities (again) abusing a black…
    Why is THAT not worthy of at least a mention here at TheBlaze?
    Could it be that the Dent story doesn’t carry the narrative that looks to be sold here at TheBlaze?)

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] March 27, 2015 at 3:09pm

    lock_n_load
    I will say ‘amen’ to that!!!

  • [-7] March 27, 2015 at 1:09pm

    Interesting you phrase it that way.

    So I read the Act and frankly, since it is written in ‘legalize’ its pretty hard to understand. Regardless, I’d like to ask…
    So if a Christian can discriminate based on “religious freedom” THEN… Why wouldn’t someone of Islamic faith be able to apply the same law so that they can ‘express’ their religious-based beliefs in say…
    Sharia law?

    Pence said. “… it essentially says, if a government is going to compel you to act in a way that violates your religious beliefs, there has to be a compelling state interest.”

    Interesting how Gov Pence also talked about this law this way. When asked “whether there were any real-world developments in Indiana that justified this new state law” – Pence replied: “I’m not aware of cases and controversies. … But this isn’t about any present controversy as much as some in the media want to make it about.”
    And SO… As identified by Steve Benen: “As far as the governor knows, Indiana hasn’t had any problems necessitating a change in state law, so policymakers created opportunities for discrimination – which may well lead to, in Pence’s words, “cases and controversies.”
    Fixing what is not broken eh? Creating potential problems – eh?
    BIG Govt stepping in to supposedly stop something when… “not aware of cases and controversies“.
    Nice job Pence – sticking it to / going against a core conservative principle.

    Responses (14) +
  • [-2] March 27, 2015 at 11:57am

    Gonzo
    You (and some others posting here) obviously have no clue as to what communism ACTUALLY looks like.

    Responses (3) +
  • March 27, 2015 at 11:50am

    Hello?

  • [-5] March 27, 2015 at 11:47am

    WOW! You CAN be observant RJJGGjeejeebooboo
    So curious. For ALL those many, MANY times foo posted after I – NEVER presenting anything related to the content I offered… Was that “stalking”?

    So since you are so observant RJJinGayaaa…
    When you just make stuff up that goes against what all others observe… That’s intentional then – huh?
    Nice
    -

    foo foo pa roo
    You are once again SPOT ON!!!
    I saw this and immediately had to take my mother’s doily and wipe away the tears from my eyes. Nothing sadder to a lefty than the sight of an all aluminium gun that can’t be used to kill anyone.

    And so now you the foo are dreaming about my wife too.
    Thank you.
    I guess when actual contact with a female is so rare… Someone like you foo tends to let the mind… drift and fantasize.
    Good for you buddy.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love