User Profile: zapparules

zapparules

Member Since: September 24, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] August 28, 2015 at 6:14pm

    And so is The Donald when he USES god to try and garner votes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-8] August 28, 2015 at 6:11pm

    AvengerK
    ‘Chickens have come home to roost’ does not equate to ‘what they deserve’.
    But don’t let that little fact get in the way of your narrative.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-4] August 28, 2015 at 5:30pm

    Oh that’s what he writes RJJ.
    Now he makes perfect sense.

  • [-3] August 28, 2015 at 5:25pm

    ‘Cos compared to the flowers and the birds and the trees
    I am THE Monk man
    I think I’m so educated and I’m so civilized
    ‘Cos I’m a strict conservateriann

    I’m THE Monk man, I’m THE Monk Monk man
    I’m THE Monk man
    I’m a righteous man I’m THE Monk man

    I am THE Monk man

  • [-10] August 28, 2015 at 5:19pm

    SLAPTHELEFT

    Here. I got this one…

    FRAUD!

    Responses (3) +
  • [-2] August 28, 2015 at 4:12pm

    BLACKDIAMONDSKIER
    So you seek to equate support for the good Planned Parenthood does today as supposed support for the comments of the organizations founder in 1939?
    OK. You go with that.

    Yea. And ONLY blacks use Planned Parenthood (for abortions and other services) – right?

    “I can see how your hatred …”
    Can you now?

    “decency and honor”
    Like that shown by the organization who executed this sting operation – heavily editing video and perhaps acting illegally?
    So one wrong justifies the doing of another – eh?

  • [-5] August 28, 2015 at 4:00pm

    southerninfidel
    Fly that Rebel flag brother!

    Tell me more about me and what I believe with your baseless commentary.

  • [-2] August 28, 2015 at 3:36pm

    rayvet: “It’s my property, I’ll do what I want.”
    No. You won’t. Unless of course you seek to expose yourself to legal action.

    “That’s why people buy property with water”
    People buy property with water for all kinds of reasons.

    “you urban city slicker.”
    We happen to own 5 acres. Not much less than what this fella owns which is eight.

    Freedom does NOT mean one can do what they want regardless of the impact on others.

    Boy your ignorance is on full display.

  • [-3] August 28, 2015 at 3:28pm

    hermena
    Happy to hear about your self censorship and keeping yourself ignorant.
    Good work.

  • [-3] August 28, 2015 at 3:27pm

    Just channeling her inner-Trump

    Responses (6) +
  • [-8] August 28, 2015 at 3:25pm

    I know. I hear ya packerbacker12
    Those people who would seek to shut the government down – based on “heavily” edited gotcha videos. Video that have initiated numerous state investigations that have failed to find any instances of illegal wrong-doing. Videos shot by an organization that is now facing its own criminal investigations and lawsuits for their potentially illgal actions in this matter.

    Yea. I’m pretty sick too of those people who would try and shut our government down based on such.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-5] August 28, 2015 at 3:19pm

    So let’s see how long this story remains near the top of The Blaze main page site – while this story…http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/08/28/questions-and-answers-in-planned-parenthood-controversy/#comment-9740710 – continues to get ‘buried’.

    Let’s see how many responses to this story gets – versus responses to the other story I just linked to. A story much more important than this one as it relates to the factual accuracy of these abortion videos – the cause for calls for this government shutdown.

    Are some (Trump? Cruz? others?) going to actually seek a government shutdown based on videos that have been “heavily” edited and on accusations of an agency that so far has been investigated by numerous states and where NO illegal activity has been uncovered?

    Responses (8) +
  • [-5] August 28, 2015 at 3:11pm

    So are you a real Monk – or a ‘Sears Monk’?

    Responses (5) +
  • [-10] August 28, 2015 at 3:08pm

    foo
    Way to try and offend the Benedictine Brother.
    Nice.

    And so… Are you actually concerned about the death of birds / bats by these turbines?
    Or just pretending / using such as I suspect.
    Are you perhaps also concerned about the serious health problems caused to humans by our use of fossil fuels?

    Responses (9) +
  • [-2] August 28, 2015 at 3:01pm

    Additionally disabledcovetern
    When have I EVER indicated I believe abortion is “okay”?
    When have I ever said anything to indicate I believe “it is okay to kill them and divvy up the parts” – ?!?!

    I ‘accept’ abortion in cases of rape, incest and for the health of the woman – but that in NO WAY equates to me thinking abortion is “okay”.

    Yes. “all in the name of choice”
    And the ONLY way ‘we’ are truly going to stop such is to address WHY some CHOOSE that.
    Stopping funding to the ‘tools’ of such – like Planned Parenthood – which also, I believe, REDUCES unwanted pregnancies so… Stopping funding to PP and attempts to destroy that agency – I believe – does more harm against the cause of stopping abortions than good.

    But PLEASE disabledcovetern…
    Stop with your assumptions about my views on abortion. If you can quote me on something and want to challenge me on that… PLEASE do so. But otherwise…
    Accountability for your lies – mis-truths / false assumptions about me disabledcovetern!

  • [-1] August 28, 2015 at 2:44pm

    disabledcovetern
    You might want to get your facts straight.
    Tell the TRUTH!

    I can find NO story about there being a lawsuit for those stickers being put on the books.
    Yes, a parent, some others have registered their complaints about such but…
    Unless you can provide a link to show me where legal action has been taken against those stickers…
    I will hold you accountable for lying about such.
    It’s all about accountability in truth and lies – right?
    “The dilemma today is that people have no accountability to anyone or anything when they lie.”
    Sound familiar?

    And curious
    When the sticker offers… “If you have questions concerning sexual intercourse, contraceptives, pregnancy, adoption or abortion, we encourage you to speak with your parents.” … When the parents of those children don’t give ‘good’ information about “sexual intercourse, contraceptives, pregnancy, adoption or abortion” … Then what?
    Such FACTS OF LIFE… They CAN be taught without causing ‘harm’ to the proper aged children. AND such would probably go a long way to making sure young adults are better educated about such – when… Is so often / too often the case, parents don’t uphold their responsibilities and tell their children even the basic FACTS of these matters.

    “You know as well as I do that schools are not allowed to teach abstinence even if it is included in with birth control and PP stuff.”
    No. I don’t know that.
    Show me proof of that please.
    Remember…
    ACCOUNTABILITY!

  • [-4] August 28, 2015 at 2:30pm

    How?
    Because over and over again I have seen story after story about these Planned Parenthood videos – securing ‘top billing’ on this site and maintaining ‘top billing’ — and I have read post after post by MANY here saying how critically important this issue is… that stories like the Cecil the Lion one and any other supposed ‘trivial’ story like that was/is but a distraction from this CRITICAL abortion story…
    And yet here we have CRITICAL details about the FACTUAL ACCURACY of this matter and… This story is very quickly pushed down on the front page.

    STILL being pushed as a key headline story… “This Video Starts Bad and Ends in Chaos” story. A story about a homeless couple beating on each other and the good folks that stopped it.
    Is THAT story more important than the factual details of this abortion sting operation?

    Interesting how many posts most any other story on this matter gets and yet this one..
    Still under 100 posts.

    These facts are not supporting the narrative that so many here want to sell about Planned Parenthood and so…
    This piece IS getting buried.

    But like I said…
    I should be happy it has at least been carried on this site.

  • [-4] August 28, 2015 at 2:18pm

    foo
    Since I know you are challenged by the English language… And it is selfish on my part too because I’d really like to understand you so…
    Perhaps this will help you out…
    http://www.straighterline.com/blog/need-remedial-college-courses-you-are-not-alone/
    NEED REMEDIAL COLLEGE COURSES? YOU ARE NOT ALONE

    Perhaps more specifically…
    http://study.com/academy/course/remedial-9th-grade-english.html
    Remedial 9th Grade English

    Good luck.

  • [-4] August 28, 2015 at 2:09pm

    rayvet
    Are you ignorant or just playing dumb?

    There are MANY other ‘elements’ at play than just the amount of flow of water.

    The “freaking stream” is on his property – and on LOTS of other peoples’ properties also!

    What don’t you understand about the extended impact of one’s actions?

  • [-6] August 28, 2015 at 2:04pm

    2GodBeTheGlory
    So you’re a Constitutional expert?

    So the Constitution – as written over 200 years ago – is a PERFECT document and those who wrote it knew EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING and covered EVERY possible situation that could arise in the future – eh???
    (Take drones for example. Did our forefathers foresee the creation / use of drones? Did what they write in the Constitution cover everything we need to effectively oversee and regulate their use? Seeing as drone use can easily cross state boundaries – in numerous ways…)

    So EVERYTHING we / the govt is able to do or should not do is identified in the Constitution – eh?

    If your only argument is: ‘It’s not in the Constitution’ – then… I consider that a massively failed argument.

    When there are environmental issues that cross state boundaries… Then what?
    Should one state be allowed to pollute the land, water and air of another? Should not there be some Federal oversight and regulation of such?
    Of course you will say no. And you may offer that the Fed can be involved… JUST judicially.
    Well what good is it AFTER THE FACT when massive harm – if not death – is done? Is it not a ‘dereliction of duty’ – or our government’s responsibility to protect ALL its people (and resources) – to stop harm BEFORE it happens (when such can be done)???

    Yea. Tell me that you support ONLY judicial Federal action when it is YOUR property – or YOUR loved one harmed or killed – and all you have is after-the-fact recourse.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love