User Profile: zapparules

zapparules

Member Since: September 24, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [-23] August 3, 2015 at 6:37pm

    “They are in to killing babies.”

    I suppose you just don’t realize how utterly insane you sound.
    AND how baseless such a crazy claim is.

    Responses (14) +
  • [-1] August 3, 2015 at 5:33pm

    Blest
    People didn’t kill Jeaus.
    Government killed Jesus.

    Is that it?

  • [-1] August 3, 2015 at 5:30pm

    Wow are you full of yourself Blest.

  • [1] August 3, 2015 at 12:00pm

    Ted Cruz: “received more than 175,000 donations, and the average contribution was $81.” (From July 16th Brietbart story)

    Bernie Sanders: “the 400,000 donations came from about 250,000 individual donors. The average donation was $33.51 and 99% of donations were under $250.” (From July 2nd CNN story)

    And then there is the ‘hidden’ money / donations…
    “So far this year, for every dollar raised by a presidential candidate, more than four dollars has gone to a super PAC.”

    “Topping the list of mega-donors on the right is New York hedge-fund manager Robert Mercer, who donated $11 million to a super PAC aligned with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.). Houston private equity investor Toby Neugebauer gave $10 million to another Cruz super PAC.”
    “Farris and Dan Wilks, billionaires who made their fortunes in the West Texas fracking boom, have given $15 million of the $38 million that the pro-Cruz super PAC, Keep the Promise” “Together, their donations give Cruz and his allies more money than any other Republican except Jeb Bush”

    Nothing like literally trying to buy a politician – eh?

    As compared to Sanders…
    “During his campaign stop in Madison, Wisconsin on Wednesday night, Sanders drew an audience of 10,000 supporters, the largest crowd to turn out for any 2016 candidate yet—illustrating yet again how the U.S. senator from Vermont may not have as big a war chest as his rivals, but he has the voters.”

    Of the (super wealthy) few – OR…
    Of the (‘common man’) many – ???

  • [-5] August 3, 2015 at 11:42am

    Boomchucker: “Religious Freedom is based on the literal meaning of both the Bible and the Constitution”
    Literal meaning?
    “depends on who you’re talking to” – Right?

    So who specifically gets to decide on the “literal” meaning of not only the Constitution BUT ALSO (at the same time for any specific ‘topic)… The bible too.
    And when YOU (or others) do not agree with that (supposed) “literal” interpretation… ???

  • [-5] August 3, 2015 at 11:39am

    ultraright
    So is it YOU who is going to decide which organizations are CLAIMING to be religious entities or church “for the sole purpose of promoting immoral and sinful acts.”
    You do realize god/faith/religious beliefs VARY WIDELY – even within supposed ‘same’ beliefs – right?
    So I’ll ask again… Will YOU be the one deciding such “purpose”? If not, please identify how that process is to go.

    “These groups are hypocritically trying to hide behind a Constitution for which they have no personal regard!”
    And YOU can PROVE that… HOW?

  • [-3] August 3, 2015 at 11:34am

    argyle58: “Because you, and your ilk, were right here supporting this little piece of local legislation at the time it was passed, and supported her issuance of subpoenas.”
    WRONG!

    You will find NO evidence of my supporting this mayors action against these churches.
    I do believe some church entities can (and do) ‘skirt’ the boundaries of some of the ‘regulations’ that define that they are allowed to maintain a tax-free status HOWEVER… I also believe one better tread VERY CAREFULLY if they are going to accuse them of such and even much more carefully if they are going to take some sort of action against them on such grounds.

    “your ilk”
    Just what / who is ‘my ilk’?

    ” subjugate … practice your fetish into complete submission.”
    First… MY fetish? And you base that on what?
    And can you perhaps expound on what you mean by “complete submission”?
    Heck. Identifying even what ‘partial submission’ would be would be helpful.
    Thanks

  • [1] August 3, 2015 at 11:27am

    mrca
    So these kind of hunts are for food / to sustain existence – ???

    For many, this is … innate historical drive in man.”
    Maybe.
    And for many this is but the unnecessary killing of… How did she put it? Oh yea.
    “Such a amazing animal!!”

    So a “real man” (or woman) in your book is one that kills amazing animals for sport / trophies – ???

  • [-4] August 3, 2015 at 11:22am

    YES BigDog2372
    Kind of like that.

  • [-8] August 3, 2015 at 10:29am

    Ah.
    So it is Freedom of Religion / Religious Expression if – IF you believe what I believe.
    Otherwise what you others (god/faith/religiously) believe… is wrong.

    Great argument there folks.
    Just great.

  • [-8] August 3, 2015 at 10:24am

    oompa
    Wow. What an amazing concept – provide ‘proof’ of what one contests – eh?

    What side of the argument have I provided?
    Please feel free to cite SPECIFIC examples of when I have given my side of the argument and not at least tried to explain WHY.

    Interesting how you mention nothing about the original NCnative post or my challenges to such.

  • [-8] August 3, 2015 at 10:21am

    Git-R-Done
    WHAT truth?

  • [-7] August 3, 2015 at 10:21am

    argyle58
    Similar to what I asked NCnative…

    So how do you equate the actions of one mayor with the beliefs / actions of all homosexuals / their supporters / AND ME?

  • [16] August 3, 2015 at 10:16am

    “Such a amazing animal!!”
    So I killed it.
    “I couldn’t be any happier!!”

    “There is a connection with the animal”
    And then I kill it.

    Responses (17) +
  • [-10] August 3, 2015 at 10:13am

    oldguy49: ‘when you LET yankees move into YOUR state’
    Darn straight!
    So let’s make certain we control who and where people can live in this country. It’s the only way we’re gonna stop this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-20] August 3, 2015 at 9:23am

    NCnative
    So just how do you justify trying to equate what most homosexuals want with the actions of the Houston Mayor?

    Just WHAT EXACTLY is it that homosexuals “can never be charged for doing the very thing they complain about the most”?

    So since the Supreme Court ruling… Can you expound a little on your contention that “nothing has been the same”?

    “I suppose that it all still falls into line with the rest of the Left’s New Webster’s Dictonary, where left is right, up is down, bad is good, good is evil, freedom is slavery, and truth is whatever we want it to be.”
    Do you enjoy just making stuff up?

    You wrote a fair amount in your post but… Really said nothing at all. Certainly nothing of… Substance. Nothing that you provide supporting material with.
    Other than that…
    Great post.

    Responses (11) +
  • [-21] August 3, 2015 at 9:13am

    Curious. When a church or god/religion believers hold a god/religious belief that they should provide ‘sanctuary’ to illegal immigrants…
    What do you supposed supporters of religious freedom say then?

    Here’s a story on such (from a favorite news source of some of you folks I’m sure…)
    MORE CHURCHES JOINING ‘SANCTUARY’ MOVEMENT TO SHIELD ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM DEPORTATION
    ************************/big-government/2014/12/05/more-churches-joining-sanctuary-movement-to-shield-illegals-from-deportation/

    Responses (9) +
  • [4] July 31, 2015 at 8:32am

    Lion killing sells – Unborn killing does not.
    Oh wait. Yes. Unborn killing also sells – just not in the media.

    Why would the media present negative stories about something it loves and supports? Come on now. We all know the MSM is fully vested in making sure as many unborn are aborted as possible. And certainly all the MSM decision-makers (who have decided to show lion killing and not unborn killing stories) are also directly financially invested in the profit-making schemes of fetal tissue sellers.

    Squirrel

  • [-6] July 30, 2015 at 5:23pm

    So how about that trophy lion killer still ‘missing’?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] July 30, 2015 at 5:21pm

    Interesting that some of you focus on but the monetary value of these items. From the gold medal being mostly silver to why (conjecture of money problems) being the reason Craig selling these items.

    Far, FAR greater ‘value’ (than anything financially fleeting) was generated and gotten by the efforts and outcomes of these few (Olympic) sporting games.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love