User Profile: zhaan

Member Since: December 08, 2011

CommentsDisplaying zhaan's 10 most recent comments.

  • You guys don’t understand women’s bodies! Women don’t get “big butts” because they are fat – they get big butts because it is *genetic.* Some of us women are pear-shaped. Some of us are inverted triangles. Only a very small percentage of women are the classic “hourglass.”

    There’s a reason why black women tend to have bigger butts – it’s just genes being passed down. Asian women in general have smaller butts and some white women have no butts at all – though women of all races can be of varying shapes. Nothing to do with being fat whatsoever. I have a smaller upper body and a black woman’s behind – I am at the right weight for my height. I am not fat. It’s just a genetic quirk I got from my mom, that’s all. Some men love it, and others not so much.

    There’s no reason to insult Michelle Obama for her genes just because her husband is a jerk.

  • @STARMAN70 – No, many of us Californians who came to Texas left California to get AWAY from the mindless worship of Obama. And some of us used to be Democrats. My friend and I moved to Texas in the past few years – we used to be Democrats in Southern California – we woke up, and my friend is a staunch Republican and I’m a Libertarian now. And even though I’m in Austin it’s definitely not California by any stretch of the imagination. Seems like there are more Ron Paul types here than anything.

  • Locked, technically, a woman does have a choice if she doesn’t want to get pregnant due to a rape. A woman who is that concerned about it should take the pill (whether she’s in a relationship or not), or if she truly does not want any children ever, she can proactively get her tubes tied. However, I do believe that most anti-abortion laws would exempt rape and incest. And the fact is, most abortions are not because of rape, and many women use abortion as their preferred method of birth control.

  • Amen, VEGASDAD702. Those of you who are trigger happy and hoping to start a violent revolution are FOOLS. All you’ll do is be overrun by the feds, killed in another Waco-style incident, and then they’ll make you out to be crazies in the mainstream media and use that to clamp down even more on everyone’s freedoms. Don’t be stupid. You getting violent is *exactly* what they want!

  • I agree with Captain Crunch’s comment. It’s bad enough that Glenn is being sucked down into the juvenile by Pat and Stu (who I do like, BTW), but now the editors at the Blaze think this is worthy of highlight. It’s not funny. HEY EDITORS AT THE BLAZE – GET A CLUE! Your audience overlaps with Alex Jones’s! Whatever happened to “with malice towards none”? Rise above this pettiness, please!

  • @Brother Winston Smith – I am one of those so-called “naive” women in the 35-55 demographic, and I subscribe to both Glenn Beck *and* Alex Jones. And I wish men like you – and Jones and Beck – would stop creating so many divisions among people who are ultimately on the *same side.* There are many things Glenn Beck and Alex Jones disagree on, but they are more ALIKE than different. I don’t agree with everything either of them say. But I have enough SENSE to not try to bash one side or the other when our common enemy is statist totalitarianism. Beck and Jones come at it from different perspectives, that’s all. Frankly, I’m tired of the InfoWars extremists who bash anyone who is more “mainstream” as being shills, simply because they don’t think 911 was an inside job, and I’m also disappointed with Glenn Beck for bashing Alex Jones for having a different point of view. Y’all need to come together, and not get sidetracked with petty differences.

  • Encinom, are you truly that in denial or just not that bright? You mention “bogus arguments about the debt.” What’s bogus about trillions in debt? That’s a fact. Even the Democrats won’t deny the numbers, they’ll just pretend they don’t matter when they do. You write: “More jobs will reduce the debt and government policies do create both private and public sector jobs.” More jobs *paid for* by the government do not reduce the debt! And you also backed up what I said when you mentioned “government policies.” I totally agree that “government policies” can help businesses create jobs. I disagree that more government SPENDING, which is what *you* want, creates jobs or reduces debt like you claim.

  • Encinom, I know this is difficult for you to grasp, but some of us believe it’s not the job of the government to “create” jobs. It’s the job of the government to get out of the way so businesses can create jobs. Putting through another costly bill that increases our debt just to curry favor of some veterans does NOT help them in the long run. The debt will destroy the dollar and the economy if left unchecked. The Teabaggers are the party of “hate” you say? Well, the Democrats are the party of stupidity and denial over fiscal reality.

  • More Obot operatives from the Obama campaign. Campaign must be getting desperate to send you guys over to The Blaze to comment.

  • I find it fascinating how, the closer we get to the election, the more you go on sites like this one and suddenly all these Obots and “concern trolls” show up out of the woodwork to try to demoralize people. “Why should we vote FOR Romney?” Hey, how about the man is a successful businessman who actually has executive leadership skills, unlike community organizer Obama.

    If the DNC is paying you trolls to post here, they really need to give you better talking points.