As I mentioned on another post, 4termlimits, we should all be thankful to Trump that at least his run for the WH made sure Bush wouldn’t get anywhere near the top tier. Trump has my vote if he’s the nominee, too. Again, his Presidency will be far from a Conservative one but it won’t affect me personally.
I actually don’t have anything against Trump. I was a big fan of The Apprentice. His hard core supporters on the other hand…..
 December 11, 2015 at 2:51pm
“…were not supposed to…’
Says who? In the military, I was taught it was disrespectful but no one says you’re not “supposed to.” This is America and in America, we’re free to do so if we wish. I don’t think his use of the flag is disrespectful at all.
December 11, 2015 at 2:49pm
No doubt, the kid is right, the dad is right, and by all means, I agree 100% he should be allowed to use that picture if he so wishes. That said, he looks like a douche.
@[Suspended Douche] -
Not handsome enough for ya? Muscles too big? Too small? Pants the wrong color? Don’t like his haircut? Don’t like running shorts? Wish he had a better tan? Better with a mustache? Longer sideburns? Better if he had a 'MOM' tattoo? You like blonde men best? Wish he was on a beach with more men around him?
Something tells me you might, just might look like a douche…
I thought he was pretty cute. If I were 40 years younger I might ask him out for a date. Since I'm not, let's just say any normal mom or grandmom should be proud to have a son/grandson like him.
[-12] December 11, 2015 at 2:46pm
I realize reading comprehension is a deficiency many of you suffer to I’ll try to make this a little clearer for you. Notice my post has words like “most” and “some.” In English, this means one isn’t generalizing.
I too have seem SOME (there’s the key word again, kids) Trump supporters who will support the GOP nominee. The loud ones, or squeaky wheel if it helps you comprehend, are saying they won’t.
Having said this, if the “Trumpanzee” shoe fits, wear it. You’re not hurting me. I’m a reasonable person. A Trump Presidency, which would be at best center-left, won’t hurt me at_all. Hell, even a far-left Presidency wouldn’t affect me personally. But if you’re living paycheck to paycheck or can’t afford home or private schooling for your children, it’s gonna hurt. So tread lightly….
 December 11, 2015 at 2:33pm
Yeah, I’m not sure what these tough guys wanted him to do about it. Sure, he could have gotten his ass kicked, too. I suppose that would have made everyone feel better.
Most of you would piss your pants at the sight of one of those black guys let alone four so you may just want to tone it down a bit. I’m looking in your direction, truebirther.
December 11, 2015 at 2:20pm
You’re a damn fool if you think Trump is using his own money on this campaign. A_goddamn_fool.
 December 11, 2015 at 2:19pm
Yeah. Brad Schaeffer really nailed it. This is exactly what the problem is and I personally am thankful for Trump if only to make sure Jeb Bush doesn’t win. In my eyes, Conservatives have already won even if Hillary takes the Whitehouse.
December 11, 2015 at 2:15pm
Don’t, dude. Don’t….
December 11, 2015 at 2:15pm
I’m surprised Cruz fell for this. The NYT played him like a fiddle. They wanted him to say the story was crap so they could release the audio and make him look stupid. They succeeded.
[-10] December 11, 2015 at 2:11pm
I’m right there with you. At that point, they’re only screwing themselves.
But either way, Trump supporters, or “Trumpanzees” as they should be called, are highly unreasonable. Even if Trump loses in the primary, most have already claimed they will stay home or vote third party anyway. Some have even said they’d vote for a Democrat. So you can see why the GOP sees no reason to appease them.
Consider your source on that claim. The Trump supporters I know will vote for whatever candidate actually wins the nomination. Any of them would be better than the best of the Dems.
...sorry, Zorro, most Trump supporters would have naturally drifted toward the chosen candidate without month of vilification...I would gladly support Cruz over Trump, but being called a chimpanzee has no CONSTRUCTIVE value...
...there's the rub...highly unreasonable...maybe you should take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth, Zorro...
...talk about unreasonable...you just described the "Unhinged" Glenn Beck...Glenn Beck will support Bernie Sanders, Jeb Bush's Billionaire will support Hilliary Clinton...I will probably still vote for whatever Republican gets the nomination, as most Trump supporters would have done, if the mainstream hadn't spent months vilifying Trump supporters and calling them racists, Nazi or Trumpanzees?
I refuse to vote for an Establishment R. Simply refuse because they are damn liars and nothing will change. If the GOP is afraid of a split vote then they better not nominate an Establishment hack. If they do, they get what they get and so does the country.
I realize reading comprehension is a deficiency many of you suffer to I'll try to make this a little clearer for you. Notice my post has words like "most" and "some." In English, this means one isn't generalizing.
I too have seem SOME (there's the key word again, kids) Trump supporters who will support the GOP nominee. The loud ones, or squeaky wheel if it helps you comprehend, are saying they won't.
Having said this, if the "Trumpanzee" shoe fits, wear it. You're not hurting me. I'm a reasonable person. A Trump Presidency, which would be at best center-left, won't hurt me at_all. Hell, even a far-left Presidency wouldn't affect me personally. But if you're living paycheck to paycheck or can't afford home or private schooling for your children, it's gonna hurt. So tread lightly....
For the record I'm a Cruz supporter, but if Trump is the true nominee, he gets my vote. But if the nominee is Bush... I will stay home and not vote for the first time in my life. I will NEVER vote for Clinton but I cannot stand for another liberal career politician. Cruz, Trump, Carson or Rubio all would have my support, but not Bush.
As I mentioned on another post, 4termlimits, we should all be thankful to Trump that at least his run for the WH made sure Bush wouldn't get anywhere near the top tier. Trump has my vote if he's the nominee, too. Again, his Presidency will be far from a Conservative one but it won't affect me personally.
I actually don't have anything against Trump. I was a big fan of The Apprentice. His hard core supporters on the other hand.....
Here's your problem....first you say...and I quote:
"But either way, Trump supporters, or "Trumpanzees" as they should be called, are highly unreasonable."
That is a declarative sentence. There are no limiting factors - you made an all-encompassing, declarative sentence about a group of people. Most people learn not to do such things in the 5th grade.
Then, you go on to defend your statement by trying again to belittle those who replied to you. You do so by saying, and I quote again:
"I realize reading comprehension is a deficiency many of you suffer to I’ll try to make this a little clearer for you. Notice my post has words like “most” and “some.” In English, this means one isn’t generalizing."
But as was previously pointed out, your sentence was not a generalization - it was declarative about the entire group of, as you so eloquently labeled them, "Trumpanzees".
Say what you mean and mean what you say - then stand by it. Don't p!ss on our heads and tell us it's raining.
My account was suspended for that "Naggers" South Park reference I made on another post. I swear, the Blaze has no sense of humor. LOL....
Anyway, thanks for showing everyone the importance of context, Conservative_Dave. I did, in fact, make a distinction and if you were too lazy to read the rest of my comment, I can see how people could get confused.
On that note, ladies and gentlemen, I bid you all farewell. I had a great time commenting on this site for many years. But as you can see, I've clearly worn out my welcome.
God bless you all.
"Trumpanzees” as they should be called, are highly unreasonable. Even if Trump loses in the primary, most have already claimed they will stay home or vote third party anyway."
You just described the strategy of Republican insiders and their big money supporters, if Trump were to win the nomination.
No, you didn't add context. The context of "most" and "some" was used in your post to define what they (Trump supporters) would otherwise do.
You said, "But either way, Trump supporters, or “Trumpanzees” as they should be called, are highly unreasonable. Even if Trump loses in the primary, most have already claimed they will stay home or vote third party anyway. Some have even said they’d vote for a Democrat. So you can see why the GOP sees no reason to appease them."
You used "most" to define what you believe "most" will do if Trump loses the primary. You used "some" to define what others would do if he loses the primary. Such context was not given to the aforementioned declarative sentence in which you lump all Trump supporters under the derogatory term "Trumpanzees" and claim them all to be "highly unreasonable".
This is about as black and white as it gets.
On a separate note - sorry to hear your account was banned. That's BS and I know exactly which episode you're talking about from South Park - I actually laughed just reading the word.
SOME people named Zorro are arrogant jerks. A FEW of them might post idiotic comments on news websites. MOST people will see what I'm doing, even though I'm generalizing, of course.
That’s not true about Trump supporters (maybe some but not all).
In fact , it might just be the opposite.
I want Cruz as president , but I don’t think he can win enough middle to left voters in the general election .
Then lets look at the REAL PROBLEM
I just heard today , Neil Cavuto ask Tom Ridge on his show
-Would he vote for "Trump for president" If he was the GOP pick.
First he said Trump will NOT be the pick .
THEN Tom said IFby chance Trump did win the GOP nomination.
He said adamantly ,that he would NEVER vote for TRUMP as president ..!
And there wasn’t enough time to explain why.
Meanwhile I haven't heard a peep out of these establishment hacks ,since The Muslim brotherhood took over the WH.
Makes me sick.
That's complete nonsense!! I've been for Trump sense his announcement speech. SO guess I'm a Trumpet or whatever colorful derogatory name you like to place with being a Trump supporter. Having said that, I will vote for the other candidates when push comes to shove. Except Bush, I will not push that button. Cruz is my second, then Ben, The others will require holding my nose and remembering how much I dislike Clinton.
If Carson moves to a third party, so will I. And that is EXACTLY the reason to appease not only the Trump supporters, but also the Carson supporters.
 December 10, 2015 at 3:40pm
Shouldn’t these Muslim converts be going into mosques and preaching there? Odd they’re not doing it. I’m sure it’s on their list.
 December 10, 2015 at 3:36pm
No one looked “terrified” to me. Did they look “terrified” to you?
 December 10, 2015 at 3:34pm
For those of you constantly blaming millennials for all kinds of things, guys like this moron are on YOU. If you hadn’t constantly beat his ass, hadn’t constantly given him all those sworlies, purple nurples, and what-have-you, he wouldn’t be such an insufferable ***** today. Guys like these only understand ass-whoopin’s now. And he’s about due for one.
 November 9, 2015 at 4:56pm
At least you’re consistent, foobared.
 November 9, 2015 at 4:44pm
I love football. I hate football fans. I can’t stand them. What I really hate is that I’m just like them. That is why I only like to watch football in the comfort of my own home where I can be an idiot and I won’t get my ass kicked.
"fans" ---> short for "fanatics" !
i scotch-taped my ears to a point prior to episode 1 of "Star Trek: Enterprise".
Duck! Zorro, mrs. Zo is a SEAHAWKS fan-lol
Same here. I like watching sports, but I have no desire to expose myself to a bunch of drunken lunatics. I don't want trouble and I don't want to be caught up in anyone else's either. I might as well just inject myself with poison than to surround myself with poisonous people.
Had to laugh at your comment. I've done one better than this guy. Tried to pick a fight with the entire defensive line of UGA back in Athens Bar in '86. Not a smart move. I'm all of 5'5" tall and weighed about 130 at the time. The only thing that kept me from getting my butt handed to me is a friend of mine's brother was on the cheer leading team (yes, I said brother on the cheer leading team) and he talked those guys out of probably killing me. So I learned several valuable life lessons then. 1) Stop mocking guy cheerleaders and 2) I'm a terribly over confident drinker that my small size seems to forget.
Most fun I had was many years ago arguing with a Ravens fan when I was in San Diego about whose team was worse his or mine. I said mine and he said his. We both drank a beer and watched to see who would snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Is this a hate crime?? or just plain STUPID??
Great comment zorro, I think a lot of us feel that way.
 November 9, 2015 at 4:23pm
Whoa, whoa, whoa….what happend to all the cries for “compliance” we’ve seen on other stories? The circumstances didn’t matter to many of you. You just wanted the perps to comply. Why are you changing your story?
I agree these cops went way over-board but you can’t deny the officer was very specific when he said that one guy was under arrest for assault. At that point, you can’t argue he has to comply.
It's not assult if he illegally entered. Try that in Indiana and he could be stopped with deadly force.
I agree. The policeman did not illegally enter. When some one is going to be arrested they can't simply flee into their door and say you can't follow me in. It doesn't work that way. The individual should have complied with a lawful order. The minute the other sheep started to prohibit the policeman's investigation they broke the law. He could arrest every one of them.
..."they can’t simply flee into their door and say you can’t follow me in"
Yes they can, it's called a search warrant. Look it up.
 November 9, 2015 at 4:15pm
Nothing shows how open minded you are than when you shut down those that speak things you don’t like to hear.
 November 9, 2015 at 3:36pm
Wrong, Tesseract1. It angers me every time there is true police brutality. The difference is the race baiters only care about certain races and don’t give a damn about anyone else.
 November 9, 2015 at 3:04pm
Wow. Imagine for a second if the race were reversed?
This story angers me. It really, really angers me.
This scene has unfolded the other way a thousand times, and now you're mad? Selective memory and selective outrage is a real hurdle to intellectual honesty. Don't fall into that trap
Yes, now we're mad, just as we are EVERY TIME there is evidence of police misconduct.
that one in the picture on the right has a really light complexion.. Will they try and claim hes a white, black?
Remember Oloser and the media love to hate the cops. Zero and those ladies on the view, CNN, NBC, etc., would talk about this daily for the next 2 years or until these guys were hung - if the races were reversed.
But when it’s a few black cops killing someone white…………crickets.
my thought is you cops better clean your own house while you can.
this site is always full of the just comply with the cops type people who do not understand we live in America. If responding cops do not give you your rights you do not get them.
If the races were revered sed and the kid was black like Aiyana jones in Detroit then the cops would have never been charged with murder at all! That's the politically incorrect truth.
I agree Zorro...there is more to this story then we will ever find out...whole thing stinks!
If the dad sues the taxpayers suffer...needs to come off of the police departments budget not some general fund that doesn't affect their bottom line!
I cannot imagine what this dad is going to go thru for the rest of his life...these two need to suffer!
It's been an extremely bad day for cops. The Marshall Service is going down the tubes nearly as fast as the Secret Service. Weren't we treated to a story a few weeks ago about some Marshall in grunge attire pointing his AR at some kid filming him?
My view is the victim was a drug dealer who had these guys hooked, and they got mad and sought some kind of way to take him out...or they were the dealers, and he owed them money. Maybe some kind of crooked cop scenario. Their mugs don't look like cops. No good.
Faking a warrant?
No gun on the victim?
Victim not trying to run them over?
Not looking good.
Got to love that Dieversity! It's awesome!
Making us stronger everyday.
Remember the unarmed Black lady in the car with her kids near the Whitehouse that was killed by Whitehouse security in a spray of bullets into the car? It happened right after little Treyvon was killed in self defense. Never heard a peep out of O'Clown or the Treyvon crowd. The Liberal Media brushed it under the rug. Wrong Narrative.....
Black cops killing a white child damn near kill the father!
You think the whites will burn down Marysville?
Not a chance.
They better be glad it wasn't reversed if it was there wouldn't be a safe place in the city.
...This, is outrageous. And I can't even put my thoughts into words right now, oh my god.
If everything they say is true and it sound like it's an airtight case, give them the death penalty!
Why should they simply get life in prison?? They took the life of a 6 yr old child that had nothing to do with anything they were involved with. Give them the chair, or a water slide into a boiling hot 300 gallon pool of water. Let them feel what it's going to be like, when they go straight to hell!
[-3] November 9, 2015 at 2:50pm
Yeah, I’m sure that’s how liberals see it. The see it as hope. *rolleyes*