User Profile: suz


Member Since: September 03, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • August 20, 2014 at 4:31am

    i use the word “stupid” way too much (this i know) to describe a person not taught the facts on something but really, they’re just ignorant. so there’s this overwhelming ignorance that has swept the globe, apparently for quite a while and this sort of confirms itself over and over. a community doesn’t know the truth but they know the propaganda — it spreads to that state — then to that country, etc.

    it can be done w/a lie. a lie told over 100 years becomes the truth.

  • [1] August 19, 2014 at 9:56pm

    lately gr’s been wrong — he’s right here. harris — i love her — is wrong.

  • August 19, 2014 at 5:21pm

    will the nyt cite bho for having “bad political judgement?”

  • [1] August 19, 2014 at 4:34am

    i think you both make the ultimate point, morally, ethically and scientifically. i’m still stuck on the process. how are we going to do it? america’s been doing legal abortions since the 70′s. it is ingrained in young to old that this is acceptable.

    first, people’s hearts must change.

  • August 19, 2014 at 4:17am

    unclear w/the map that was shown — the bottom half being red (republican/whigs) the upper east states being blue (democrats). i thought it was the other way around. i thought the abolitionists in the north were republican and the dems, who fought against freeing slaves were in the south.

    two disagreements w/mr. barton’s analysis that we have a smaller ‘swing’ vote. more and more democrats and republicans are becoming libertarian. i think what’s happening is that the democrat party is shrinking into the die-hard progressives casting out all the blue-dogs and the republican party has the ruling rank (blue dog democrats) and a hearty bunch of libertarian/tea party. but it seems that independents are leaning more to the right as i have;


    during charlie sumner’s arguing abolition in the debating chamber he was beaten to a pulp by another politician because he literally violently disagreed. it was a this or that.

    when pelosi crossed the isle it was out of utter arrogance. the facts were there she just didn’t want to hear it. there was no choice, no debate–she and her party were guilty. this is a different thing altogether. does she think she’s a queen? yes. but we know she’s not a queen.

  • August 18, 2014 at 7:45pm

    how ’bout not gmoing everything?

  • August 18, 2014 at 7:43pm

    religion means to ‘bind back to G-d.’

    incorrect that atheism or humanism would be considered a religion. the definition would have to be changed for that ruling, so it’s silly.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 18, 2014 at 7:06pm

    …because who brings more calm to americans than that guy.

  • August 18, 2014 at 6:59pm

    just saw GOD’S NOT DEAD.

    the student makes kreeft’s point somewhat that G-d cannot be disproven. this is mine:

    for instance, i believe (and bare w/me) that roe v. wade should stand because a woman has the ultimate say what she will do or not do to her body. those w/religious or what is considered to be high moral ground would say that i would be advocating for murder.

    i (in an awkward way) belief these two extremes (actually an extreme would be something called ‘after-birth abortion or the sangeresque ‘until self-awareness’) must exist. i may crossover some day into the ‘high moral ground’ but here i am. everything is as it should be for i wholly appreciate the view that no abortion should ever exist because that is the killing of a human being.

    do i sound contrarian?

    what stops me from going there today is the question of: ‘what is it going to look like when the impregnated does\ not want this child?’ will we hold her down and strap her to a bed for 9 months? pump birthing drugs into her?

    our society is not there yet. but maybe someday IF we teach our children well, then our placement in the extremes will move to the high moral ground.

    Responses (4) +
  • August 18, 2014 at 5:13pm

    what happened to the firetruck? why didn’t it remain and put out the fire? it just drove through.


    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 17, 2014 at 8:37pm

    other than where the ball landed that was rather good form.

  • [5] August 16, 2014 at 5:39am

    impressive that buckley understood while in the moment what was happening at yale. kind of a glenn beck in the midst, feeling something ominous coming on.

    depressing and disappointing that while he spoke about his analysis, nothing changed. nothing happened to turn the 1950′s (dare i say government) student/prof./parent/readers’ ear to some act that would impede or interfere with that continuum of collectivism being taught at yale. and nothing’s changed. it’s only expanded exponentially.

    Responses (2) +
  • August 13, 2014 at 9:49pm

    ever been to a korean market?

  • [2] August 13, 2014 at 1:57am


  • [1] August 12, 2014 at 7:38pm

    mothers don’t change their baby’s diaper at the restaurant table. period.

  • August 12, 2014 at 7:27pm

    this is about balance. we can all have extremes. dwelling on the dark is the imbalance. a long-slow dwell that goes beyond physical and mental pain until it needs to not exist. that ‘need to not exist’ is the mystery part that happens to people. it’s the saddest part of depression because it’s unreachable, inaccessible.

    i don’t think (but i don’t really know) that it’s as easy as glenn wants to make it: “it doesn’t have to be that way. it’s going be okay.” certainly he’d know better than most.

  • [2] August 12, 2014 at 6:55pm

    this is a straight-forward issue. where does the money come from? where does it go.

  • August 11, 2014 at 7:17pm

    so there it is: concast actually DOES NOT VALUE their customers; the reps., both on the phone and the tech who went out to the customer’s house, lied about the service the customer would be receiving when they claimed it would be free-of-charge and the tech lied on his notes costing customer more money — ‘THERE’S NO WAY THEY CAN REFUND because….yhati blah.’ this woman/rep on the phone actually lies by saying ‘there’s no way we can refund’ when in fact an $82 charge was reimbursed BECAUSE CONCAST WAS AT FAULT. oh, gee thanks for giving us our money back when it’s concast’s fault! thanks for the “THIS IS WHAT I CAN DO FOR YOU” bull.

    for some reason i wasn’t able to hear customer’s responses on this call.

  • [1] August 11, 2014 at 4:38am

    i think s.e. misspoke and meant to say the israel/likud charter is against a palestinian STATE (not the destruction of palestinians) based upon certain border restrictions. all things would need to be aligned before any negotiations of a ‘palestinian state’ were ever to proceed. however, she’s well holding her own on the very essence of the point she makes.

  • [2] August 10, 2014 at 4:06am

    i feel the same. those guys don’t make me laugh. they used to. not any more.

123 To page: Go