Same here. I narrowed it down to two immediately, but alas….
 September 10, 2015 at 4:38pm
…and we share up to 98% shared genomes with rats, not to mention our internal organs are arranged almost identically with rats. From the Human Genome Research Institute.
We are pretty close to owls. Owls given arsenic burp, we die.
So what does all this mean?!? How really “close” is a percent? If I am only one degree off shooting at the moon, assuming my round will go that far, I miss the whole thing by several thousand miles! Kind of like this whole debate.
September 8, 2015 at 2:57pm
Feral – my bad.
 September 8, 2015 at 1:55pm
“I don’t like spider and snakes …. ” Jim Stafford :)
 September 8, 2015 at 1:53pm
“You are not going to get away with killing whom you choose anymore.”
Thank you Zwolle :)
I and many other officers appreciate people like you….
 September 4, 2015 at 12:21pm
I made a mistake! The correct word in the amendment is not relegated but reserved – meaning those rights were never relinquished to the federalies.
 September 4, 2015 at 11:49am
MOD wrote “As far as judicial review powers of the SCOTUS, that is not explicitly in the Constitution, just like 99.99 percent of laws in our country are not in the Constitution …”
AND THERE IT IS. What does the 10 amendment say? Anything NOT specified in the Constitution is relegated to the STATES and the people thereof. YOU as well as Marshall’s opinions violate the Constitution. Two poor decisions do not make it right.
 September 4, 2015 at 10:20am
MOD – Here is the jurisdiction of the black robes:
“The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.’
Each jurisdiction begins with -to all cases:
Please show me where is say to make law or to rule on laws passed by congress to determine their Constitutionality?! IT does not.
Enjoy the rest of your “drive by Friday.”
 September 4, 2015 at 9:49am
This is why teenagers should stay away from affairs of the heart. Go fishin, huntin, have fun, and heed Obola’s advice. As Richard Pryor used to say, girls will make men walk out in front of a bus.
 September 4, 2015 at 9:40am
Mod – Holy Hell you just can’t help yourself can you?! Hope your foot tastes good. A man (fellow Texan) is dead.
There is an old Yugoslavian saying, “if stupidity was painful, there would be certain people screaming night and day”
September 3, 2015 at 9:07pm
LOL Only 16 seconds? Nah, I reckon it SEEMED like 30 seconds.
 September 3, 2015 at 8:58pm
Katzkiner – STANDING OVATION. One for your mom and Sears & Roebuck as well.
 September 3, 2015 at 8:09pm
An oak tree, a rope and a horse will do just fine.
 September 3, 2015 at 7:42pm
Physeter – The 14 Amendment (clause 1) was crafted solely to address the Freedmen. The 9th Amendment addressed the fear of the anti-federalists. Since only some natural rights were listed in the Bill of RIghts specifically, there was a fear that the federal government would infringe on the rights not listed. Did you know for the first 100 years of the once great nation no law was ever cast out by the black robes based on the idea it was violating some unlisted right?
Did you also know that this amendment only applies to the Federalies?! Read the 10th amendment. It is funny how the Progs are happy to trample all over other peoples’ natural rights to force their own agenda…then turn right around and start citing the Constitution and holding their breath.
Can’t have it both ways!!! DON”T TREAD ON ME!
 September 3, 2015 at 5:35pm
What a let down. That is 30 seconds of my life wasted.
30 seconds? it was a 16 second video,did you watch it twice?
LOL Only 16 seconds? Nah, I reckon it SEEMED like 30 seconds.
 September 3, 2015 at 3:08pm
Harry – I don’t know if she had to authorize the old form personally or if it was signed stamped by someone else. Im gonna find out. That is irrelevant to the point. The form did not have her personally endorse what her religion forbade. And you need to check the US Constitution again. The US Constitution does NOT supersede the state constitutions except in those specific instances spelled out in Article 1 Section 8.
And here is Section 5 of the Kentucky Constitution: “…and the civil rights, privileges or capacities of no person shall be taken away, or in anywise diminished or enlarged, on account of his belief or disbelief of any religious tenet, dogma or teaching. No human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience.”
See NO HUMAN AUTHORITY, in any case WHATEVER. She is a Prog target to make a point. Nothing more.
 September 3, 2015 at 2:07pm
Looking and Harry – her job changed due to the dictates of the governor which changed the “marriage” form from one that declared the bond between and man and woman to one that was sex neutral. But here is the kicker – it also required the clerk to PERSONALLY authorize the union. Also – read the Kentucky constitution and finally the decision to force homosexual marriage on state governments was outside the authority of the US supreme court. They have no jurisdiction. No matter what the black robed tyrants says.
 September 3, 2015 at 2:00pm
At least Stivers knew his own state constitution: Section 5 “Right of Religious Freedom” “”…and the civil rights, privileges or capacities of no person shall be taken away, or in anywise diminished or enlarged, on account of his belief or disbelief of any religious tenet, dogma or teaching. No human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience.”
Too bad the US District judge did not know his…
I bet the preamble of the Kentucky constitution gives FFR nightmares.
“We, the people of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties we enjoy, and invoking the continuance of these blessings, do ordain and establish this Constitution. ” Oh wait – I must be reading my own interpretation into this preamble…being a Christian and all.
September 2, 2015 at 11:00am
Zipit – Love the new Avatar! I’m assuming it depicts the forming of a Prog.