Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: bluegoldnationdotcom

bluegoldnationdotcom

Member Since: March 03, 2011

CommentsDisplaying bluegoldnationdotcom's 10 most recent comments.

  • I have a better question….why is this story on the Blaze? Why choose the story? What narrative does this advance? Why not pick one of the THOUSANDS of churches doing good deeds to advance the cause of Christianity instead of continuing the liberal nonsense that churches are hateful places?

  • He nailed the answer. So he stumbles at the beginning, IT IS FOR A NEWSPAPER. Why does a person have to have an answer in 15 seconds? Allow the man time to gather his thoughts. Once he did he nailed it.

    I question the Blaze’s headline and the reasoning behind the wording….again.

  • New Ron Paul Ad Takes Aim at Romney, Perry & Bachmann

    August 17, 2011 at 6:48am

    In reply to Ranubis.

    Ron Paul running as a libertarian would be republicans worst nightmare in 2012 and would give the election to 0bama. The best thing for republicans would be for Paul to run as a democrat and primary 0bama but that ship has sailed and Paul is FAR from being a democrat anyway. So be glad Paul is running as a republican and not as a third party candidate. I would be like Ross Perot part 3.

  • I missed the part where she said that Canada and Sweden lead the way in student achievement….oh yeah she didn‘t because they don’t…Japan and Korea lead the way. Maybe she doesn’t like the teacher set up in those nations?

  • Do you think this will make the CBS News as a affirmation of the Bible’s accuracy?

  • This ruling is a joke. Using the 14th Amendment is an AMAZING stretch. The 14th amendment kept us from having segregated public schools, these are schools with admission standards. So if I was a lawyer, I would look for ANY kid who was turned down by one of these public universities for admission and take the college to court seeking admission via the new bastardized 14th amendment.

  • I get tired of the Blaze staff trying to lead people to conclusions. I don’t see Lebron standing over this kid taunting him. He dunked the ball because of the contest he was in with all the kids. Why stir up dissension just to stir it up?

  • It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

    On a side note, I hate the automatically playing video on the sidebar. Maybe the Blaze can add flashing gifs and automatic popups to be even more annoying…..wait what is that? Okay, I guess all that is left is animated gifs.

  • Is the Blaze suppose to be a right wing blog? If so then why doesn’t your headline writer write to fuel the fire for the left? Is it about getting lefties to read this blog to increase your traffic so you can sell your solar panels ads for more $$???

    I am more and more getting disillusioned about the commentators on the right squeezing their viewers for every single penny that they can while THEY believe still maintaining their credibility. I have no problem with them making a bunch but at some point enough is enough and you being to give the other side a REAL target to undermine your credibility.

  • What is wrong with how he handled this interview? So he holds the position that he says that he would resign if he was in their position instead of calling for them to directly resign. I don’t think it is a big deal and it is all semantics. Do you really think that he is supporting Weiner in any way but NOT directly calling for his resignation? Do you think that it would make a real difference if he did?

    I do agree that it seems very black and white in this case but it seems to me that Santorium holds on to this technique to keep himself out of stepping in something when situations contain a lot more gray.

    Some of you are making statements like this will be the reason that you won’t vote for him – I hope you are looking forward to being disappointed by everyone if this is your criteria for it.