Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: BMMiller1975

Member Since: February 09, 2011

CommentsDisplaying BMMiller1975's 10 most recent comments.

  • I think we’re all in trouble now:
    showing unusual interest through questions related to
    * Use of anonymizers, portals, or other means to shield IP address
    * Swapping SIM cards in cell phones or how phone location can be tracked
    * Unusual comments regarding radical theology, vague/cryptic warnings, or
    anti-U.S. sentiments that appear to be out-of-place and provocative

    Lord, that could apply to just about every Blaze member I’ve ever seen post anything. I guess anyone who posts on this site better consider themselves an enemy of the state and likely to be on the FBI’s most-watched list.

  • Jesus said that we were to feed the hungry. Any city that thinks they are a higher authority than God himself should check their ego at the door. No one is required to follow a law that requires them to violate the laws of God.

  • I say we call for impeachment. This has gone on far too long. He is violating our constitutional rights at a record rate and we need to send a message.

  • This Chinese Baby Was Born With Two Heads

    May 11, 2011 at 3:04am

    In reply to ANewActivist.

    @ANEWACTIVIST: Let me get this straight. You think their life is less valuable, that they are less human, because they are different? How appalling.

  • @GAYDEM4BECK: Your attraction to others of the same sex may be genetic, but your choice to have sex with others of the same sex is behavioral and immoral. A married man is biologically attracted to other women, but if he acts on that attraction with anyone other than his wife it is immoral. Both adulterers and homosexuals were given the same punishment in the Old Testament. God forbids sex outside of marriage and limits marriage to men and women. To say that you should have the “right” to “love” someone of the same sex because you struggle with this problem is like saying someone who claims to have a genetic tendency toward pedophilia should have the right to “love” little children. Everyone struggles with something. Nobody gets a free pass to indulge in it. We’re called upon to rise above it. It‘s actually very condescending to you or to anyone who struggles with same sex attraction when they treat you like animals and say you shouldn’t have to control yourself. I prefer to recognize you as human and say that you can control yourself and should. Furthermore, when God has forbidden it anyone that you engage in that sin with has become an idol for you and you, by insisting they engage in that kind of relationship with you, have made yourself an idol for them.

  • @TWO PARTY SCAM: Gosh, TPS, you’ve outted us! Now we won’t be able to carry out our nefarious plans to take over the world by converting every man, woman, and child to a belief in Jesus Christ. Incidentally, I don’t know where you learned your history but I would highly recommend revisiting it. The Pope did not establish the Jesuits – St. Ignatius of Lloyola did. You might try reading his work – The Spiritual Exercises. I think you would find it not only enlightening but also inspiring. :) God bless you and thank you for your earnest, if misplaced, attempts to educate others to dangers present in the world.

  • @WTSPIKE: I am sure pedophiles would agree with you. I am sure they would want you to accept them as they are because they don’t choose to be like that, they can’t help it, they are just born that way. I am sure they would tell you it’s a tough life and ask you to have some empathy for what they go through. That’s the problem with your statement. I have empathy for the struggle, but the real truth is that every human being struggles with something. We may be born with problems controlling our anger. We may be born with problems controlling our weight. We may be born with problems learning. We may be born with any number of weaknesses, but that doesn‘t mean we should get a free pass to indulge those weaknesses or that we should be permitted to force other people to indulge us in those weaknesses because we aren’t willing to do what it takes to overcome our weaknesses. You expect no less from someone who is born poor – why are you giving yourself a free pass?

  • And I am guessing that she is equally offended by pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey since it obviously encourages animal cruelty? Can anyone spare a life for this poor woman? Obviously, her local stores were out of it when she went to get one.

  • @SLYSWINE: The Pope does not deny the possibility of evolution being used by God to create man, but what he is saying is that if that is the case there is nothing random about it. In fact, random chance is directly opposed to the existence of science. Science was created by men of faith, based on the belief that 1) There is one God; 2) That God created the universe and all things within it; 3) The universe and all things within it are governed by a set of unchanging laws He established; 4) God desires man to know the Truth, and therefore has given man reason that man might, through observation of the world around him, be able to discern the truth; and 5) the means of distinguishing between the truth and a lie is to test the assumption – what is true will still be true after testing, what is not will fall apart during testing.

    For science to exist, there cannot be anything random otherwise there would be no point to conducting experiments as you could never be certain – no matter how tightly you controlled the variables – of getting the same result. For instance, in our universe today if you toss a six sided die and you control all of the variables (height and angle at which the die is released, amount of force applied upon release, air pressure, angle at which the die strikes the surface, etc. etc.) you can always be sure you’ll get the exact same result. Even when not controlling all of the variables you know that you will never get any result other than a 1,2,3,4,5, or 6. Anything that appears random in our universe is actually operating according to several complex variables acting together or else is behaving according to a set of rules we have not yet understood correctly.

    However, in a random chance universe were you to roll that same die you could get a 1,2,3,4,5, or 6 – or you might get a 20, or a -5, or the die might disappear altogether. The results would be random and entirely unpredictable no matter how tightly you attempted to control the variables there would always be this element of randomness to the result, thereby making the experimentation pointless.

    Thus, any supposedly scientific theory which rests as squarely upon random elements as evolution does is a contradiction of everything science requires to function and therefore entirely illogical. Furthermore, the fact that 95% of our DNA might match another species does not prove that we are descended from that species or even closely related to it, anymore than the fact that 95% of the brush strokes and paints used to create The Mona Lisa also match those used in La Belle Ferroniere prove that the Mona Lisa descended from La Belle Ferroniere. What it does suggest is that they have the same origin – the same creator.

  • On top of that it won’t be cool when the flood waters rise and mosquitoes rule.