Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: cgbs6183

Member Since: October 26, 2010

CommentsDisplaying cgbs6183's 10 most recent comments.

  • This is not the first time he has denied it. How do you deny a negative/untruth/falsehood? Its like saying when are you going to admit to beating your wife when you REALLY don’t beat your wife.

  • @JoanK I am pleased you recognize a lot of things Ron Paul says has value. I think he understands the threat of Radical Islam or at least their end goal, but also at the same time the CIA term called Blowback where our Foreign Policy (not the American Citizen) at least exacerbates the situation.

    You have no fear of Paul and Shariah Law. Ron Paul takes the Oath to the Constitution very seriously and therefore would never support a theocracy style government that Shariah Law would impose. His Oath as a Congressman and member of the Air Force affirms that.

    Ron Paul supports States Rights and I firmly believe that he would support Oklahoma in their endevour to establish that Shariah Law is not acceptable there (course with the US and Oklahoma Constitutions it should be a moot point….however, judges these days!)

    Ron Paul most definitely understands that our Constitution has its roots in Judea-Christian values (while not being a theocracy) and he himself is a man of Christian Faith. I don’t doubt the other candidates faith…but Newt leaves me with some questions maybe not in the larger picture, but himself personally….however Paul actually has a page on his site called Statement of Faith

    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/

    More often than not Ron Paul can site the passage of scripture that relates to our Constitutional style of government and compare that to the bad practices we have today.

  • Weak and grasping at straws. Amazing how people of a supposedly conservative bent hate it when people use the race/ethnic card unless it services their own political agenda it’s ok to throw around the term anti-Semite or racist. Of course anyone who knows anything about the Bible and history will be able to tell you Jews/Hebrews (Language) are not the only Semitic people in the middle east.

    The UN Set Israel up and ever since then we in the West have been focused on telling Israel what to do and violate their sovereignty. Ron Paul would stop giving money and guns to Israels enemies. Ron Paul would stop asking Israel to divide up their land or how to defend themselves. Ron Paul was on of the few in Congress that did not condemn Israel for blowing up Iraq’s Nuclear Program .

    Also I have the book and I can‘t find where he explicitly calls Israel an Apartheid state but what he does do is raise the subject as it there seems to be more debate within Israel’s own government and media to that concept than in the US. The more I look at this video the more I think this was either staged or the lady has a track mind. Flipping to the very end about Zionism. Paul Probably did that on purpose so people can understand his message in context instead of flipping out halfway through without calling him an anti-Semite.

    For a good video on if Paul has misguided views about Israel http://www.fox19.com/story/16327085/reality-check-are-ron-pauls-views-on-israel-misguided-and-extrem

  • Here is information about the Austin TX. NAACP President Defending Ron Paul

    http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134-naacp-president-ron-paul-is-not-a-racist.html

    You Tube of an African American Man defending Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1uc7×4a8SM

    What this is, is one incident of poor management by Paul by allowing at the time about a half a dozen people write in his name for several newsletters not just one while he was practicing medicine and raising 5 kids. Do some research and you will find the one that was of particular interest to him was his newsletter on investments/financials/monetary policy. So was Paul negligent in this, yes, he admits that much and that he is morally responsible for that. However his entire life and belief system is predicated on individual liberty and freedom not racism which is a socialist collectivism mindset.

    He has been asked this same question every election and he gives essentially the same answer. If Race baiting is all they have on Paul then they have nothing.

  • Newt Gingrich had high praise for Alvin Toffler and his book “The Third Wave.“ He liked it so much so that he wrote the forward to Toffler next book called ”Creating A New Civilization”

    What does Tofferl have to say that Newt thinks is so great.

    Toffler wrote a letter to our “Founding Parents” stating “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented – a democracy for the 21st century.” According to Toffler, our constitutional system is one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.”

    Newt considers himself a Conservative Futurist. I guess now we know where the Future will lead with him. Getting rid of the Constitution

  • Yes the GOP Challengers was horrible. Most citizens in this state cannot stand David Williams the GOP forced this loser on us because he has amassed enough power and control. We had a good candidate in Phil Moffett. Some went for Gatewood in the General, some opted not to vote for either and some actually decided that between the two Beshear was actually the lesser threat.

    We had to fight the party tooth and nail to get Rand in past the primary. Same here in this race.

    I don’t know about the rest of the country but in KY we seem to be in constant election mode and the grassroots is wearing out and has less money. First 2008, then 2010 Senate with Rand and the House Races, then we had to immediately start on Phil because he was not establishment for the 2011 Governor race, heck that race started before Rand’s was over, now 2012 Presidential and and House races again, then after that back to the Senate hopefully to oust McConnell with a Liberty Republican. Sheesh, I guess it is a good problem to have but because we are poor grassroots and not rich establishment we have to start earlier, spend more of our money % wise and work 3x as hard.

  • I am from Kentucky and I will tell you basically what happened. The GOP interfered with the Primary because their candidate of choice for Governor was the Bully from Burksville David Williams a man that is despised by the normal every day citizens in both parties. We had a legit Liberty Candidate that would have been a Teflon man in Phil Moffett in this election but the media and the party squashed his chances for their favored loser. See Phil had to go against the establishment candidate that was well funded by political elites, a third candidate sent specifically to destroy his home region in Louisville. Phil lost by like only 10% in the Primary in a 3 way race outspent 10-1, where the winner David Williams did not even crack 50% of the total vote.

    David Williams and his personality and policy dragged the entire GOP ticket down save the Agricultural Commissioner Jamie Comer who managed to get more votes than even the governor in this traditionally Democrat state locally, federally it is mostly Republican. Farming is important in KY thus it is still an elected position.

    So we have a stubborn GOP in this state that did not want to help the TEA Party because it was not their chosen candidates, even though they wound up being the Republican candidates, Our Auditor candidate, and our SOS Candidate as well as the Agriculture candidate was also TEA Party endorsed.

  • I am from Kentucky and I am surprised The Blaze and apparently CNN chose this to report on it as practically no one in the state knows about it.

  • Article III of the US Constitution states:

    “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

    The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

    While al-Awaki may have been guilty this sets precedent that the government can assassinate US Citizens it deems terrorists. Remember the DHS Lexicon. I would like to have known what al-Awaki known but now we won’t because in our haste to make us feel good about the world wide War on Terror (a tactic, how do you declare war on a tactic….oh wait we have not even officially declared war.) we have killed a US Citizen and violated our own Constitution.

  • Ginsburg: Still No Plans to Step Down

    July 2, 2011 at 3:02pm

    Wow, if this is not trolling I don’t know what is.