Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: cykoaudio

cykoaudio

Member Since: April 15, 2011

CommentsDisplaying cykoaudio's 10 most recent comments.

  • For all you gun lovers out there,that justifiably defend your right to bear arms,& fight against corrupt gov’t takeover of civil rights,I don’t understand how so called conservatives will fight here &there for civil liberties,but when you hear a candidate go ALL the way in sticking to his guns on civil liberties,you want to stop half way-say,”well no,not THOSE liberties”.Thats like a Christian,who believe some sins are ok,but some you vilify/judge ppl to the death.We ALL real conservatives have to vote for Paul simply b/c he is the first one who tells the truth of what sticking to the Constitution really means,even if unpopular-or do you want a republican version of Obama,who tells you what you want to hear?? Then does as his master,the Fed Reserve,tells them.Does anyone not understand the Fed is our biggest problem& until we fix our economy,all this b.s talk of helping or not helping Israel won’t matter? I was under the impression,until recently,that conservatives/Christians were a bit more pragmatic & unbiased,like most repub’s disavowing Bush w//TARP,& admitting Bush’s failures,while libs always defend Obama no matter what.But now I hear alleged conservatives who dismantled Romney’s positions & obvious political grandstanding/flip flopping 4 years ago,ALL OF A SUDDEN decide he’s a conservative & willing to vote for him-thats called being brainwashed.Paul is the only one who stands on a rock,even when that rock is considered taboo,or unpopular

  • Using this logic we have a new definition of conservative-pander & cowtow to ALL things Israel,EVEN IF IT’S NOT IN OUR BEST INTEREST,JUST THEIRS-2,promise to bomb Iran & look tough by promising sanctions,even if it leads to WWIII,& it could have been avoided by some intellectual,pragmatic policy process-3 use the threat of foreign danger,the new boogeyman of this decade,to steal away our civil liberties,which is where btw,all of you alleged conservatives SHOULD break off with the likes of Morris & take Paul’s side,for James Madison said,”the threat of foreign danger,historically has been used to usurp our liberties here at home”.This is where the neo-cons thrive,& where we the ppl,the real Constitutional Conservative Party should flip them the bird,& say,yea even if we have to stay true ALL the way,& make some things legal(how did Prohibition work for ya?),we can’t go half way on civil liberties/rights.As far as the other issue(other than Iran/Israel,that ppl part ways with Paul on),drug legalization,does anyone know how much debauchery was caused by prohibiting alcohol,& the fact that when a society is allowed to do something,the use & abuse GOES DOWN,NOT UP.Paul doesn’t WANT to make heroin legal,he is just perfectly correct in sticking to the Constitution on states rights,& the failed “war on drugs”.I.E,there merely should be no FEDERAL law prohibiting it,let each state decide.So stop,BLAZERS,letting Morris & Fox redefine what a real conservative is

  • This should prove to EVERYONE once & for all Fox has sold out to the establishment/ neo cons who want to police the world,as much as CNN,Time mag,MSDNC,& the like-I like Morris a little,but I will watch him no more,& make sure me &all my friends do our own little boycott of Fox-SO DICK MORRIS IS GOING TO SAY ROMNEY IS A CONSERVATIVE??..lmfao..he’s half right,Paul is a Constitutionalist,Every view Paul holds is strictly glued to the Constitution.So if some neo cons want to usurp & coup the conservatives too,they do so at the detriment of the republican party as a whole,because a vote for Romney/Newt is a vote for Obama.Newt/Romney both,are as “establishment” as they come,the good ol boys party,ultimately led by the Fed Reserve & Paul is the ONLY one who has balls to speak out against the Fed,& promise to audit them.This quote is not only a joke & psychotically disingenuous,but Morris is flat out lying knowingly.Paul is proven Christian,the BEST PRO LIFE VOTING RECORD,& the most knowledgeable & experienced on what ails our economy & how to fix it.Romney keeps bringing up the Olympics,Geez,that was eons ago,get over it.I don’t know what voting record “Dick” was looking at,but RON PAUL HAS BY FAR THE MOST CONSERVATIVE VOTING RECORD OF THE TOP 3..I know Dicks only concern is pandering to EVERY Israeli request,like that was the most important issue of this elex,but its not even top 3 priority.Our economy is #1,& Paul beats all candidates on the economy

  • anyone disregarding that Paul gets the MOST campaign contributions from MILITARY families-who know more than you and I,& are not brainwashed by the media,give to Paul more than the fake conservatives like Mitt who just tells military families whatever cool at the moment-& anyone disregarding his support from college kids/independents alike,but say “I don’t know anyone who will vote for Paul”,is not fooling anyone.You’re only lying to yourself.Why does the liberal media love Newt & Mitt so much but attack Paul??? cuz they know Paul is the only one who takes away O’s edge,PLUS gets the base out & social conservative vote.I don’t know anyone who is independent or libertarian or even any college kids that would vote for Mitt or Newt as they say those two come off as status quo politicians,yup,same thing e’ryone else sees.So don’t anyone say me & my dozen friends won’t vote for Paul as “proof” that Paul won’t do better against O than other two..Why does Fox,liberal media & even the Blaze fear so much of Paul,& act like he’s not even in the race,when he wins Cali straw poll,surging in Iowa,Carolina’s,Florida,and Ohio,& is the only true conservative in the top 3?? You’ll get much more credence if you say you are staunch conservative & like Bachmann,but don’t lie to us & say you are conservative & like Mitt or Newt above Paul.I believe “troll” is the term.Should be clear by now,that Paul is the ONLY one that could take away O’s demorgraphic-blue dogs,college kids,i

  • If you’re such a big supporter of Israel,than you should realize your best bet at protecting them IS Ron Paul-do you not read the newspaper,the Blaze?? Iran is threatening to shut down Hormuz BECAUSE of our policies,just like Paul said(& when ppl say,”see Paul is saying we’re to blame for terrorists”,no he’s not,he’s just stating the logical obvious,that when our corrupt gov’t makes bad foreign policy,it emboldens countries like Iran).1st,if we don’t get our economy back in order,WE WON’T BE ABLE TO HELP ISRAEL,geez,anyone get that?? & fixing our economy is the BEST foreign policy move we can make,for us AND Israel.& don‘t ppl get that a prez is better off saying publicly that he won’t intercede e’rywhere in the world,to placate the mullahs,then do so anyway “covertly” as done recently in Yemen & Syria.Everyone should know by now our biggest threat is the Fed REserve,& Paul is the ONLY one who has balls to audit them,or begin process of dismantling.Mitt & Newt,it should be abundantly clear by now,just say whatever they think repub’s want to hear.So if you believe in supporting Israel,you should be voting for none other than Ron Paul.Isn’t it obvious we need a leader who will tell ppl the “truth”-Beck loves to talk about- even if unpopular,Paul always sticks to his guns,& any1 really think he’s so dumb as to not realize we need Israel as strategic base in mid east?Paul is a proven Christian,unlike Bush,& will defend Israel if need be,but will bring wasted $$

  • -Ron Paul is the MOST LIKELY,the ONLY ONE who can beat Obama in a general elex,hence the attacks/fear from media(controlled by the Fed).Mitt doesn’t even excite the base that got Bush elected.Romney is no real conservative,we can all agree on that,& I think we can all agree that Paul is our best shot at fixing the economy & only one who has balls to speak out against the Fed Res.So Romney wouldn’t even get the base out to vote,& certainly not the young college kids & minorities,as he is the establishment politician.But Paul has the MOST support from the young kids,eats into Obama’s young demographic,& his “libertarian” approach would garner FAR MORE votes from the indepnts & dems than Mitt&Newt COMBINED in general elex.Plus,Paul gets the TEa Party votes & a solid social conservative,proven not by his words,like Mitt-the fakest conservative ever to run for repub ticket,& proven by his record to launch liberal policies,than flip flop & say what repub’s want to hear-.Paul is the ONLY one who eats into O’s demographics,& will get ppl to the voting booth to vote repub who may have never done so before.And if all one can say against Paul is you don‘t like that he doesn’t cowtow/pander to EVERY request by Israel,& is soft on Iran b/c he won’t promise to bomb at will,u’v got your head up your arse.If we don’t get our economy back in order NONE OF THOSE OTHER FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES WILL MATTER,WHY DON”T PPL GET THAT.-A Vote for Mitt/Newt,is a 2cd term for Obama,guaranteed

  • Ron Paul on Michele Bachmann: ‘She Hates Muslims’

    December 17, 2011 at 3:28pm

    In reply to patbarker.

    @ahlearis..you’re trying to prove that Paul is not a conservative by your link is horribly disingenuous as well as deceiving and naive..that article claims that Paul is not a conservative because they claim he naive on Iran wanting nukes??THAT is the whole argument why he is not a conservative? ludicrous at best..LET ME CLEAR UP FOR ALL YOU PAUL HATERS(that use ONLY the example of Iran to discredit Paul)…James Madison said,& is truer to day than ever,& wish every Blazer/repub candidate would listen to,b/c than they would finally get it..“THE THREAT OF DANGER FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY USED TO UNDERMINE OUR LIBERTIES HERE AT HOME”did you Paul haters hear that? do we need to bring up the “intelligence” on WMD’s in Iraq to go in there & set up shop for a decade,putting us further into debt(you alleged conservatives DO care about our nat’l debt,right?) so the boogey man was WMD in Iraq,we just HAD to go cuz they were gonna nuke Israel,& y‘all very same ppl said ppl like Paul were NAIVE for questioning the intelligence that made all of us repub’s/conservatives look like fools cuz we believed & defended Bush,but instead of going in,finding out there were none,taking Saddam out & leaving we stayed for NINE MORE YEARS,so the corp’s that are under the thumb of the Fed.Res could set up shop…lets get this straight,Paul is NOT an anti-war lib hippie.HE WILL defend Israel if necessary,but WE CAN’T AFFORD policing the world,there is no counter argument for

  • this “award” holds as much weight as the Enquirers “sexiest person alive” or the Nobels peace prize going to Obama right after he expanded war in Afghanistan,sending 30k more troops….and off topic thought on the one thing ppl don’t like about Ron Paul,his stance on Iran/wars abroad….he has the backing of one of our founding fathers who said “the threat of danger in foreign countries has historically been used to thwart civil liberties at home”..James Madison….sound familiar?? “they have WMD’s,we have to strike first”…”we have to attack them over there so they don’t attack us over here”..”Iran is building a Nuke and will use on Israel,we just know it,just like we knew Iraq had WMD’s”.etc..all the fear mongering from repub candidates that we just HAVE to intervene overseas,when we’re just in an endless war in Afghanistan,and spending billions we don’t have policing the MId east,backing rebels in Libya and Egypt that even some conservatives agreed with…now how stupid do those look backing them,going along w/Obama on that one,now that the Muslim Brotherhood has taken over and there is a MORE extreme gov’t there.–so in turn,we lose billions we could use here in this country.& if we brought all our troops home and weapons, sat them at each ocean pointing away creating a blockade,anyone really think it’s even possible for someone to attack us-but with our military spread thin around world,we could be attacked & have no one here to protect,Paul is right

  • and to the other most important point everyone is missing….IF atheists get offended by some religious expression,or the words “endowed by our Creator”(I’m sure the atheists of today would have cried about the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the faith of the founding fathers too)…or get offended by a nativity scene…lets say 5 ppl out of the whole town,which in the case of the NJ recent display,it was only TWO ppl complaining so I’m being generous..so 5 ppl complain and want taken down…then 20k ppl in the town are “offended” by it not being there…WHY OH WHY would the verdict go in favor of the 5 instead of the 20k ppl….why is it ok for atheists to be offended and immediately their demands are met..but if tens of thousands of Christians are offended by no Christmas display,they get ignored….Christians to you alll IT’S TIME TO STAND UP AND FIGHT BACK,call the ACLJ to come to your area,as they usually do free pro bono work…FIGHT IN THE COURTS<FIGHT INTHE STREETS<FIGHT AT THE TOWN HALL MEETINGS,AND PTA MEETINGS…WE ARE THE SILENT MAJORITY>IT WILL BE A QUICK<SWIFT WAR,LIKE SHOCK AND AWE,BUT PEACEFUL IF WE PUT ASIdE TINY DIFFERENCES & AGREE THE BIBLE &CHRIST COMES FIRST<AND LETS START DEMOLISHING THEIR MOVES ONE BY ONE

  • it appears no one read my post on how the gov’t and Homeland Sec. is using Christians to advance their agenda,knowing we would fight to keep the words in….please read my below post,so I don’t have to repeat,BUT on the “EStablishment Clause”…it only says CONGRESS shall make no law respecting establishment of (one)religion,or PROHIBIT THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF…which means ONLY CONGRESS can’t make a law establishing a state religion,e.g.,the Church of England…but it also means the state/local or federal gov’t CANNOT PROHIBIT THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION,…public or private..as the ACLJ has fought for before and established precedent,there is big difference between lawmaking on religion and public even gov’t schools and buildings expression or displays of religion,so the courthouses and public buildings are actually PROHIBITED by the Constitution from taking down Nativity scenes and Menorahs,they just have to include ALL of them…as long as ALL religions are displayed PUBLIC BUILDINGS CAN DISPLAY ALL RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS…and are actually PROHIBITED from stopping them..so this isn’t a war AMONGST religions,its’ a war w/atheists and all religions,and atheists are in the TINY MINORITY,so they do feel left out,cuz there aren’t many of them..and apparently ATHEISTS ARE NOT TOLERANT OF OTHERS VIEWS AND EXPRESSIONS OF THEIR FEELINGS AND IDEAS,they always have to HATE on a celebration of a guy who preached love,peace,joy,sacrifice,and tolerance..proving they are bitte