CommentsDisplaying DOXOLOGY's 10 most recent comments.

• Media Claim Fact Check: Santorum‘s Tax Plan Will ’Blow a Hole in the Budget’ & Give Most Tax Cuts to the Wealthy

  January 21, 2012 at 5:51pm

  In reply to escape_from_socialism.

  @ Johnny. Can I call you Johnny?

  This is fun. Now we are starting to get somewhere.

  Do you work for a defense contractor?

  -Dox

• Media Claim Fact Check: Santorum‘s Tax Plan Will ’Blow a Hole in the Budget’ & Give Most Tax Cuts to the Wealthy

  January 21, 2012 at 5:06pm

  In reply to escape_from_socialism.

  @Johnnymidnight

  Why do you think you have to call yourself a liberal? You make some points that are neocon. Labeling oneself limits ones options for debate and growth, forcing you to find reasoning within defined borders. That does little to answer anything.
  How can I answer any of your questions when you make it quite clear that you wouldn’t listen to any answer other than the one you want to hear. So why ask any in the first place if your not open to new thinking?

  Of course you could be trolling me also, I don’t know…

• Cavuto Defends ‘Excellent’ John King for ‘Open Marriage’ Question, Tells Gingrich to ‘Save the Piety’

  January 20, 2012 at 7:31pm

  Not sure if a guy who tried to skip asking the “Doctor” about “Medical” issues is excellent? Did Cavuto say anything about that? I didn’t see the whole episode.

• ‘The Best Man Left on the Battlefield’: Chuck Norris Endorses Gingrich

  January 20, 2012 at 7:26pm

  In reply to WAKEUPUSA2012.

  Baffled myself.

  Doesn’t matter, Lady Liberty’s light is shining brighter by the day and the rats are running for cover.

  Liberty will oVercome! Good times.

  Peace.

• Media Claim Fact Check: Santorum‘s Tax Plan Will ’Blow a Hole in the Budget’ & Give Most Tax Cuts to the Wealthy

  January 20, 2012 at 6:36pm

  In reply to escape_from_socialism.

  @Johhnymidknight
  *Agreed. The attacking of people voicing opinions on one candidate or another does not net us any gains. So why do you call people ‘Paulbots’ if you don’t like the attacking? Seems derogatory and counter productive to me.
  *Agreed. I don’t think Romney or Gingrich are trustworthy, but why give Santorum a pass and not Paul?
  *Disagree. I must question some of your words. You have the econ thing pretty figured but I wonder about your understanding of the Constitution? You say Paul needs congress to get things done. That is true in many instances yes, I doubt he would argue with you on the dangers of the abuses of power in the Executive branch. But the Constitution granted the Executive branch the ability to create cabinet agencies(enforcing Congress’s laws). These same agencies can be abolished by a later President. (Paul promises to CUT five year one! When was the last time you heard that?)The trouble is presidents rarely do. They like the power! They will whine and talk all day long about this or that but in truth they can change things, they just won’t. Example: Carter=DOE Bush2=DHS, etc, etc. The only power left that Congress has over these leviathan agencies is whether or not to fund them. But they like power too so…here we are going round and round. I‘m going with the guy who wants to shrink gov’t, including the executive branch, ESPECIALLY the executive branch!!

  Peace and Love brother,

  Dox

• ‘Why I Hate Religion, But Love Jesus’: Controversial Viral Video Logs 10 Million Hits in Four Days

  January 15, 2012 at 2:32pm

  In reply to Miami.

  @MIAMI

  You used more reserved words in your debate with Archon who claims atheism, and yet openly condemn this young man as a punk wanting to get attention for questioning mans motives in religion.

  Why is that?

• Evangelical Christian Leaders Back Santorum

  January 14, 2012 at 5:59pm

  In reply to recoveringneocon.

  @GODLOVINMOM

  I understand how you feel dear. I used to have similar opinions. Then something in my life rocked my foundations.

  I am rebuilding in the Word. Speaking of the Word, did not Christ offer his blood covenant with wine?

  All I seek is a greater understanding of us. Love to you.

  -Doxology

• Evangelical Christian Leaders Back Santorum

  January 14, 2012 at 5:09pm

  In reply to recoveringneocon.

  @GODLOVINMOM

  Baddoggy…please see page three for my response to you…freedom is great…but legalizing this stuff DOES hurt others…what part of that don’t you get?

  ——————————————————————————————–

  And what of alcohol say you?

• Evangelical Christian Leaders Back Santorum

  January 14, 2012 at 4:58pm

  In reply to recoveringneocon.

  @BABEUF

  It can’t be “it depends on how you interpret the constitution”.

  ——————————————————————————————-

  Its all about interpretation, thats why everyone has a voice of color. The Bible means something different to all people, so does the Constitition. Failing to recognize this brings blind hate and judgement where there should be love. You are different than me, yet I defend your right for your voice to be heard, even if contrary to mine. That is why we must have the debate, lest we fall into darkness.

  In that regard, I feel liberty is winning! Its a facinating time to be alive dont you think?

• Evangelical Christian Leaders Back Santorum

  January 14, 2012 at 4:27pm

  In reply to recoveringneocon.

  @Ballot_Box_Revolution

  Well said sir.

  States Rights in a nutshell.