Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)

DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)

Member Since: November 14, 2010

CommentsDisplaying DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)'s 10 most recent comments.

  • Apparently you haven’t figured out that would make “jesus” a false prophet. By His own Word, Messiah cannot change the Law and said He would not until Heaven and earth pass away. Is earth still here? This would also make “jesus” a liar. Using today’s terminology we would say the Messiah was speaking ironically. He was actually quoting “old” commandments.

    I do agree with you, “jesus” was a liar and a false prophet. He is the image of the beast(Rome). Yeshua is Messiah not “jesus”.

  • Too many antibiotics in our foods and medical systems. Big Agra and big Pharma are slowly killing us all with the help of our sadistic legislators. Monoculture farms and hospitals are churning out super bugs resistant to all known antibiotics.

  • @Grace
    Thing is, the Law was given to the “mixed multitude” that came out of Egypt. Your statements are profoundly erroneous. As far as no christians, there really never were any. There were Jews that believed in Yeshua as Messiah. Christians in the original language was a pejorative, not a sect. Christians are some of the worst people I have ever met. Just ahead of Jews like “Rabbi” Lapin, Beck’s buddy, who malign the character of Jews who accept Yeshua as Messiah.

  • I prefer the .308 also. And I was not taken a counter point necessarily. I was only bringing up things people may not think about in a seemingly simple match up of a .30-06 versus a knife or a shotty. On a side note, I do love the shotty and find it very powerful, accurate and versatile.

  • You apparently have never seen what a deer slug can do? Unless you have a night scope on your 30-06 you are most likely going to be in CQB and you will be the one with the wrong weapon. Of course, then you are assuming there will be a fight? That instead, someone won’t be running surveillance on you and sneak up behind you with a knife(shhh shhh shhh)? Maybe steal a car and drive it right through you front door? In my opinion you need a gun or guns. But I don‘t think that a gun means someone without one can’t win against you. Plans and training are paramount.

  • That‘s because you don’t know anything about them. Christie decided he was going to stop all coal plant new construction(sounds like obama) and bend to the PROVEN FALSE green movement on carbon. And Booker wants you to spy on your neighbor(sounds like janet), and turn them in for exercise their right: “Even if we don’t get a conviction.”
    Get your head out of your ***es.

    Watch Christie cite false number and “alter behavior”.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-qMoqAfViM

    Watch Booker act like a creepy used car salesman:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_rY8ZUbrnU

    P.S. Wind power actually produces higher temps.

  • Never been arrested for anything… yet. Though that’s an ad hominem attack and an admission of defeat. I asked for the provision, not your opinion. I did not ask for an amendment that you think should have been added. Wow, what sound reasoning that you would think to talk of an amendment that SHOULD be added and not realize that you are saying cops are unconstitutional by that very fact that it has not been added. Rest easy little sheep. Theblaze has removed the comment and free speech. Truth has no agenda? Only if it doesn’t prove Beck wrong.

  • @dove and recon
    Get your head out of your ***es. Yes, all cops are like this. Illegal that is. All cops are unconstitutional. Fact, not opinion. Permanent standing armies are not allowed. You want one? Amend the constitution. Until then every single cop is committing treason.

  • I don’t give a s**t what all you beck and pig sycophants will say. ALL pigs are unconstitutional. If these were deputies appointed by ELECTED sheriffs, THE PEOPLE would clear them all out. No “internal affairs”, no union lawyers, etc.

    ALL pigs are part of an unconstitutional standing army. Before you pig sycophants chime in, you better start with how they are not a permanent standing army or everything you say is subverting the constitution. Thus, YOU are the leftist pigs. It is not a state issue as the states cannot override the constitution. There is no such thing as a good pig. I don’t care if he is your dad, son or husband. A good pig would uphold his oath and quit the force to go work for an ELECTED sheriff.

    I support real law enforcement officers. The elected sheriffs and their deputies. I will never, ever support a union-thug, jack-booted, pig.

    I know it’s hard for you Beckerheads understand but it is not a leftist position to oppose pigs. It is a constitutional position. Wake the **** up you goose-stepping lemmings.

    Why don’t you go do what Beck always recommends and read on the Wiemar Republic. Then tell us all how you love the brown shirt pigs.

  • @ranger
    The Law IS Grace. Grace is “old testament” as well. You really need to read the first half of Scripture. The Law is not done away with and is not opposed to Grace. It’s not one or the other. It’s both!

    ““Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. 18“For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19“Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. ”

    Fulfill in the original language literally means to fill full. That is, to give meaning. Even if you think that isn’t correct, you have issues: “jesus” would be a liar. Earth is still here and all has not been accomplished(His return).

    Yeshua(“jesus”) is the Messiah and did not(and cannot by His own Word) remove any Laws until Heaven and earth pass. Not to mention you have the issues in Scripture of Ya’akov(James) instructing Sha’ul(Paul) to take a vow that required SACRIFICES. You also have “Paul” saying quite clearly that he needed to stop to make OFFERINGS before returning for Passover(not pagan easter). The point: the sin you mentioned is a sin because of The Law.