Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: DuckHawk

Member Since: April 20, 2011

CommentsDisplaying DuckHawk's 10 most recent comments.

  • @hollow points

    Please explain how evolution produced the Golden Plover.

  • No, if the government was not regulating marriage then it would be up to the church. Marriage is a religious ceremony showing the commitment of a man and a woman under God. Therefore the only way a gay couple could marry would be to find a church or some kind of religious group to do it for them. Since we are aloud to believe what we want, then no church could be slammed anymore for not performing a ceremony that they do not agree with. I‘m going to say that if there weren’t benefits associated with marriage then they wouldn’t even be this loud about the issue. It’s not about the commitment, it’s about the money. You are the one who is not making sense in your argument. The U.S. does not prohibit anyone from loving each other. I do have a question though. If homosexuality is something you can be born with then it would have to be a weak trait? Correct? Therefore over time, the trait would die off since they can not procreate. Whether you believe in evolution or just survival of the fittest. Sure, you may have one pop up every now and then, but you couldn’t have a flourishing society of homosexuals.

  • And which comment said that free speech shouldn’t apply to her?
    Maybe I am missing something.