Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: EchoHawk

Member Since: October 27, 2011

CommentsDisplaying EchoHawk's 10 most recent comments.

  • Glenn needs to stop watching MSNBC.

  • The difference here, subtle though it is, is that you’ll never find a mainstream journalist chasing a comedian, trying to get them to answer a question on social issues such as race. You see real journalists aren’t trying to insert themselves into the story, nor are they publishing such pap

  • What a refreshing relief, no racists to worry about here at the Blaze, sarcasm off.

  • If that were only true of the bigoted masses, but that doesn’t legitimize your judgement of his performance anyway.

  • This whole argument is the source of the perceived illegitimacy of the President and any policy he’s tried to implement. Certainly there may be “loose” connections to “leaders” of the republican party but those connections from four years ago are as strong as ever to those who still cannot deal with the fact that someone of African decent is a sitting President.

  • The reason dubious corporations such as the one pictured are always maligned…. supply and demand have less to do with the retail price of a gallon of gasoline and more to do with disguising record setting profits. The speculation of unnamed brokers have inserted the algorithms they’ve written to maximize their own personal gains as opposed to any allegiance to main street or national security. I don‘t necessarily begrudge someone making a profit but you can’t tell me these people are working an honest day for an honest days pay and if you think they are that’s worse then naive.

  • The issue is of individual liberty. The Church cried foul, in the defense of the religious institution of Georgetown University, attempting to make the argument that their religious conviction was violated by the government forcing them to not refuse access, through it’s offered health care plans, hormonal contraception. The Church lost the First Amendment argument because the government has no authority to force the Churches religious convictions to apply to individuals seeking access to legally established medical benefits. The religious institution must offer a health care plan that includes hormonal contraception or it denies access by legal definition. If that plan differs in cost then either the insurer or the individual should make up the difference. In many cases the insurer may find that offering hormonal contraception is an overall cost reduction considering the alternative. $1000 in pills or the cost of delivering a child. Frankly I‘m surprised the insurer isn’t passing them out like tic tac’s.

  • What’s sad here is, after over a week of this controversy being debated, the vast majority of conservatives still frame the issue from what got pounded up their keesters from right wing pundits. The same drivel comes slobbering out, proving incontrovertibly how abjectly incapable of forming an independent thought they are.

  • With the handle P C BE DAMNED, that’s an odd juxtaposition to take. Hang up the holster for the label maker?

  • I’ve got nothing against Jewish people, Israelis in particular have a hot mess right now, surrounded by enemies sworn to your extermination, that’s got to be a hell of a way to try to live. But here’s what most conservatives will ignore and it pi$$es them of as well. People of means, the obscenely wealthy in particular, are more engaged in self interest and attempting to purchase influence, than trying to improve the overall situation. This axiom has existed since the inception of affluence itself, it is a mechanism of the human condition, money is power, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. This Republic was founded on individual liberty yes, up until an individual exercising their liberty infringes upon an others unalienable rights. Only because Beck is such a fanatical religious zealot is this story even mentioned. If thing were ever to “go down” like Glenn espouses in his fantasies, I‘ll bet he’d prove to be no particular friend of the Jew.