Meet Jeff Barth — He May Have Just Made the ‘Greatest Political Ad Ever’

User Profile: explody

Member Since: January 18, 2012

CommentsDisplaying explody's 10 most recent comments.

  • Woops, didn’t mean to be redundant. Missed this post before I posted the same.

  • If anyone was actually paying attention, they may have noticed that the expletives in the song are specifically directed at those that have and do still protect child rapists. It‘s intended to offend on purpose to drive home the point that if you’re more concerned about the F-bomb than you are about pederasts, then you have a seriously maladjusted moral sense. Here are some bits of the song that were conveniently left out of the lyric snippets above (Catholics may want to skip this)

    [...]
    If you cover for another motherfXXXer who’s a kiddie fXXXer
    fXXX you you’re no better then the mother fXXXing rapist
    And if you don’t like this swearing that this motherfXXXer forced from me
    And reckon it shows moral or intellectual paucity
    Then fXXX you motherfXXXer, this is language one employs
    When one is fXXXing cross about fXXXers fXXXing boys
    [...]
    If you covered for a single motherfXXXer who’s a kiddie fXXXer,
    fXXX the motherfXXXer he’s as evil as the rapist
    And if you look into your motherfXXXing heart and tell me true
    If this motherfXXXing stupid fXXXing song offended you
    With its filthy fXXXing language and its fXXXing disrespect
    If it made you feel angry go ahead and write a letter
    [...]
    But if you find me more offensive than the fXXXing possibility
    The pope protected priests when they were getting fXXXing fiddly
    Then listen to me motherfXXXer, this here is a fact
    You are just as morally misguided as that motherfXXXing
    Power-hungry, self-aggrandised bi

  • “the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion” – John Adams

  • Perhaps you should refresh yourself on the American legal system. Federal judges are not elected,primarily so they can interpret the law from a neutral position rather than worry about answering to voters. Congress and the president, who approve and nominate the judges respectively, ARE elected so they can answer to the voters when they pass or overturn laws, approve judges, start wars, etc.