CommentsDisplaying Fool's 10 most recent comments.

• Beck Explains His Criticism of ‘Progressive’ Gingrich (Plus the Truth About His Views on the Tea Party)

  December 12, 2011 at 7:12pm

  Beck‘s going to vote for Ron Paul after Beck’s tearful plea that we must defend Israel?

• Beck Explains His Criticism of ‘Progressive’ Gingrich (Plus the Truth About His Views on the Tea Party)

  December 12, 2011 at 7:02pm

  Beck is illogical. Newt was brought to center stage by Time Magazine Dec. 1994 as THE GINGRICH WHO STOLE CHRISTMAS!

  You know? The guy that was going to steal all the freebies from the poor? That’s your Progressive, Beck?

  So, we have two Gingriches. One who‘s just like Obama and the Other who’s the antithesis of Obama.

  Since you weren’t paying attention back then, Beck, and you probably bought all the lies about Newt that you current enemies in the media today were claiming about him, maybe you should stop and THINK!

  Do you want the heirs of today‘s mainstream media that’s so quick to trash you today, telling us in 15 years the same lies? Don‘t you want the record cleared for the sake of truth and for the sake of what good you’re trying to do for the country? MAYBE YOU SHOULD AFFORD THAT SAME FAIRNESS FOR NEWT!

• Beck Explains His Criticism of ‘Progressive’ Gingrich (Plus the Truth About His Views on the Tea Party)

  December 12, 2011 at 6:54pm

  Beck is illogical. What was Newt’s first introduction to mainstrain America? He was little known lead of the House minority, that only political junkies who voted for Reagan knew.

  Newt was brought into the spot light as by Time Magazine after he lead the Republicans into the majority for the first time in 40 years. And, gee, what was it Time called Newt? Hmmm…

  THE GINGRICH THAT STOLE CHRISTMAS!

• Beck Doesn’t Hold Back in Gingrich Interview: Tough Questions on Mandates, Big Gov’t, & Global Warming

  December 7, 2011 at 3:01am

  Congratulations, Glenn, on setting up the circular firing squad!

  Reading these comments turns my conviction that Obama loses in a landslide to a big screw the pooch moment for us who love the Constitution and can easily see the yawning chasm between Obama and any of the Republican potential nominees except for Huntsman.

  I’ve followed Gingrich since the early 80s when he was part of a clever Conservative Republican minority in the House. He was a clear antagonist of Tip O’Neil. Think about it, Glenn. In 1984, did you know a fraction of what the Founding Fathers wrote compared to Gingrich? He quoted them all the time. But, I guess you had your “progressive” period back then and weren’t paying attention.

  Should Shakespeare write a play from his heavenly vantage point about you, Glenn, it would be a tragedy. You tragic flaw would be the irresistible spiritual vanity that you’re the one last true believer. You would protest “Would that others would get this self governance thing like I do!” as the one vehicle of self governance comes crashing down as Obama and the real progressives–I mean, what the heck! Gingrich is a Progressive? He’s cut from the same cloth as John Holdren, Obama, and Cass Sunstein?–dust off their lapels as the entire Republican field bleeds out on the ground.

  Yeah, great work, Glenn. This vetting thing is going great! It just warms my heart seeing so many of your followers trash Newt.

• Was a 5th Grader Kicked Out of His Elementary School for Saying a Local Newscaster Resembles Barack Obama?

  November 18, 2011 at 2:26pm

  In reply to Diablo4965.

  Chris Schauble kicks Obama’s rear. He’s got a much better voice, he’s better looking, and from what I’ve heard, he’s a genuinely nice person. So, since these are the only talents Obama has, Schauble would do a better job–well, anything’s better than the Obama disaster–than Dear Reader.

• After Week of Scandal and Shame, Penn State Community Bands Together on Gameday

  November 14, 2011 at 1:37am

  Can we have some moral clarity on pedophilia? We have freedom of speech and association. So, NAMBLA gets a pass based on the ACLU’s interpretation of the Constitution. But then Paterno is going to be charged for not reporting what he knew to the police?

  Sure, I get that. But why is an organization that promotes and slobbers at the thought of molesting a human being who’s unable to consent not by its nature be criminalized?

  Is that too scary for the Libertarian types? Okay, then keep the Fed. Gov. out of it. Have all 50 states make a law criminalizing what is per se heinous activity? Owning guns and speaking your mind is NOT heinous. Promoting the sodomization of little boys is.

  This has got to stop. The NAMBLA is the essence of a criminal organization and we can’t see that?

• Rep. Joe Walsh Loses Cool at Town Hall: ‘That’s Not the Problem!’

  November 11, 2011 at 10:25am

  I hope more common sensical, Constitution loving congressional representatives “lose their cool” like Joe Walsh did.

• Chicago Radio Host Describes Cain-Accuser Encounter to Beck: She ‘Bum Rushed’ Me to Hug Him

  November 8, 2011 at 12:40pm

  In reply to Steelhead.

  The payoffs are Sharon Bialek being sued by an entity represented by David Axelrod. D-rod looks up a list of people he’s recently sued, preferably blondes, since the meme is that blackmen can’t but help themselves around them, and proposes a deal.

  Axelrod: “Look, honey. Would you like compensation for that judgment we won against you? Here’s what you do…”

  People have made lexis-nexis searches and found the Axelrod/Bialek connection. It’s out there. Sorry you can’t make it disappear…Chicago style.

• Cain Quips About Gloria Allred on Jimmy Kimmel Live

  November 8, 2011 at 12:07pm

  In reply to Welfare-Warfare State.

  We are acting like Clinton supporters? Where’s the dress? Where’s the recordings? This is all one woman’s assertions that, maybe, just maybe, describe actions that never happened!

  We’re supposed to take her word over his at-this-point silence with all sorts of red flags hanging over her credibility? Gloria Allred? David Axelrod?

  How about some facts? If you are against Cain because he’s not proposing cuts, then that’s political discourse and is to be debated by reasonable self-governing people. You don’t win an argument by rooting for a person to be slimed with what are probable false accusations.

• Cain Quips About Gloria Allred on Jimmy Kimmel Live

  November 8, 2011 at 11:45am

  Today Gloria Allred told Martha MacCallum that she’s apolitical, that she merely is out to protect women, since she called for Anthony Weiner to resign and Weiner’s a Democrat.

  Well, Gloria, do you expect conservatives and Republicans to believe you? You called on Weiner to resign because he was taking the Democrat party down with his huge sinking ego. You weren’t protecting women, you were doing damage control.

  Allred is a cancer to the political discourse of this country. She is in no way helpful and a predictable menace!!