CommentsDisplaying FreedomIQ's 10 most recent comments.

• Gingrich Defends ‘Humane’ Immigration Stance, Vows ‘I Am Not for Amnesty for Anyone’

  November 27, 2011 at 3:57pm

  In reply to stage9.

  Stage9, you‘re argument doesn’t hold water. Internment camps is not what anyone is talking about here. We’re talking about a one-way ticket off U.S. soil.

  The only time I would support “internment” as it were, would be for those illegals that commit crimes in addition to their trespassing and squatting. They should be imprisoned OFF U.S. soil, preferably in the middle east. The middle east is a more appropriate place to allow the illegal alien prison population to water down a culture. Who knows?! Maybe in a few generations, the Hispanics might be able to make the middle east more peaceful…then again, probably not. They can’t even reform their own native origins, let alone, assimilate anywhere they are guilty of breaking and entering.

• Gingrich Defends ‘Humane’ Immigration Stance, Vows ‘I Am Not for Amnesty for Anyone’

  November 27, 2011 at 3:49pm

  In reply to ballsofFe.

  And Glenn would be wrong. People, families, undesirables, etc. that squat on private property are always treated as trespassers and removed. It doesn‘t matter that they squatted and pumped out lil’ illegal clones. The fact still remains that they are trespassing and squatting and must be removed…and the longer they’ve squatted here, the more guilty they are. Preferably illegal alien criminals guilty of violent and other crimes should be sent to prisons, uh, maybe built in the middle east perhaps? Get em off U.S. soil. Period.

• Gingrich Defends ‘Humane’ Immigration Stance, Vows ‘I Am Not for Amnesty for Anyone’

  November 27, 2011 at 3:41pm

  In reply to TheRugger.

  They are incapable of it. History has proven it time and time again. It’s a waste of time to try and teach them the American Dream…especially since the Progressives in both the left and GOP are intent on destroying it.

• Gingrich Defends ‘Humane’ Immigration Stance, Vows ‘I Am Not for Amnesty for Anyone’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:55pm

  I find it odd that so many within the GOP will spend hundreds of billions of dollars and effort and lives to fight a war on drugs that can’t be won. However, they’re weak on getting rid of and preventing illegals squatting on U.S. soil. Talk about intellectual dishonesty. Oh, and Huntsman just came out weak on illegal trespassing this morning on Fox. I won’t even consider him now. So far, only Cain has shown any resolve on this issue. And he’s not an establishment insider. Ron Paul has been good too. I‘m tired of being the world’s babysitter (with the exception of the nuclear argument) so I’m not going to discount Paul. I know he’s a bit weak on this issue, but it’s time to put exotic foreign policy headlines on the back burner and concentrate on our own backyard.

  Bachmann is a whiny congressional-type and Santorum is an well-established animal rights nut who cohorts with organizations that hire ALF terrorists within their ranks.

  My decision is getting easier: So far it is Paul or Cain. The rest are yesterday’s news.

• Rush on Gingrich’s Immigration Remarks: ‘Romney Went Further Four Years Ago’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:44pm

  In reply to garyM.

  The GOP chose McCain because they were too concerned with “experience” and “looking Presidential”. Too many Republicans sold out their convictions (or paraded their lack-thereof) and a weak candidate played his cards and timing right. What they got was a panderer to every leftist cause Ted Kennedy could muster. And the GOP is once-again in danger of choosing yet another weak-on-illegals candidate who is establishment-loyal and not strong enough to tackle Washington.

• Rush on Gingrich’s Immigration Remarks: ‘Romney Went Further Four Years Ago’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:38pm

  In reply to mward.dinstudio.com.

  And the spineless amongst the GOP to give the accusations any credibility whatsoever is an ethical disgrace! Cain is not within the establishment and that scares Republican cronies within the party. Unbelievable.

  They’ll dump Cain over a destructive leftist strategy and fly blind towards the Gingrich camp, who is loyal to the establishment. What’s more, Gingrich has the audacity to be critical of the Occupy Wall Street bowel movement but is soft on those illegal occupiers who are guilty of years of multiple counts of trespassing!

  REASON people! It’s a concept that people need to learn. Reason. Learn it, live it, and then vote accordingly.

• Rush on Gingrich’s Immigration Remarks: ‘Romney Went Further Four Years Ago’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:31pm

  In reply to Giri.

  Wow! Is your home available for illegals, who are squatters, looters, and cultural destroyers?

  If so, please list your name, number, address, and argument that you are “compassionate” enough to let people trespass, occupy, and squat in your home.

  That is the “fair and compassionate path” you are arguing in favor of these illegal occupiers.

  I dare you to live up to it.

• Rush on Gingrich’s Immigration Remarks: ‘Romney Went Further Four Years Ago’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:26pm

  In reply to NolanB.

  Huh?! Keep those rose-colored Establishment Republican Party glasses on and see if they’re rosy enough to reinstate even an ounce of the freedom you probably claim to want returned to you.

  Neither Gincrich nor Romney are strong enough, or have the freedom-loving principles necessary to take America back from the socialist progressive movement.

• Rush on Gingrich’s Immigration Remarks: ‘Romney Went Further Four Years Ago’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:22pm

  These immigration panderers are ridiculous. Look what it did to George W. Bush’s credibility. The slimy Rove seems to have skirted the blame but he was just as much at fault. These establishment GOPers are destroying America almost as much as their socialist counterparts. Gingrich and Romney get a NO VOTE in my book.

• Gingrich Defends ‘Humane’ Immigration Stance, Vows ‘I Am Not for Amnesty for Anyone’

  November 27, 2011 at 2:15pm

  In reply to chicago76.

  You got that right! The other day on Fox he essentially said he was watching his words in order to make himself look Presidential. If the GOP thinks they’re going to get a quality candidate simply because the person watches his language and has a 500 dollar haircut, they’re dreaming. It’s just same old, same old…yawn. And America will continue to slide towards socialist tyranny unless there is a truly different President that kicks in the teeth of the looting establishment once and for all.